Thanks, Lee, most of my plays are about freedom of expression.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lee
  To: "Minds Eye"
  Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:45 PM
  Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Two questions



  Hey Willy,

  A small point but a valid one I think.  I would say that it is not
  religion it self that does stuff like this, but people using religion
  as both carrot and stick.  So I would amend your statement and say
  instead, that's the problem I have with unscrupulous people too.

  Of course that is what I would do, you, well you make your own mind
  up.



  On 13 Jan, 17:20, "willy minnen" <[email protected]>
  wrote:
  > Right, Chris, that's the problem I have with religions too.
  >
  >
  >
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Chris Jenkins
  > To: [email protected]
  > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:21 PM
  > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Two questions
  >
  > Gentlemen, you are confusing the forest for the trees. It's not the
  > existence of said deity which are the proven lies. It is the actions,
  > "will", "blessings", and "curses" of said deity that the lies are so 
often
  > centered around.
  >
  > Examples:
  >
  > Our Hurricane Katrina was said by one such putz here to be the 
punishment
  > of God for the homosexuals here in New Orleans.
  >
  > Another has called AIDS the same.
  >
  > Many others (Benny Hinn, most famously), promise that God is waiting to
  > bestow magical riches on all who give their last earthly belongings to 
his
  > church.
  >
  > Science and observation has conclusively proven all three to be false.
  >
  > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > And the saliant point here Chaz, is the 'telling lies' how do you know
  > this? How can a non belife include any sort of knowledge based
  > deduction?
  >
  > On 12 Jan, 23:33, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
  > > On Jan 12, 5:53 pm, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > > > Yet how can a non-belife show the truth or not?
  >
  > > > I have a non belife in Russell's teapot, but because I do not belive
  > > > that such a thing does not exists, then there is no passion inherent
  > > > in my non belife.
  >
  > > > If however, I did have a belife that such a thing as Russell's
  > teapot
  > > > does not exist, then I may feel passionate enough to herangue those
  > > > foolish enough to belive such a thing did exist.
  >
  > > > You see what I'm saying here Chaz?
  >
  > > Not really. I am reacting to people who are telling lies. If Russell's
  > > teapot were nothing more than anobject in orbit around Jupiter - that
  > > is fine. But if the government want to raise 20 trillion dollars in
  > > tax to launch a mission to Jupiter to recover the bloody thing then I
  > > am going to get pretty angry about it. In the same way the religious
  > > delusion is destroying lives and harming many areas of human society.
  >
  > > > On 12 Jan, 16:03, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > > > > On Jan 12, 12:23 pm, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > > > > > Heh well of course KC that is becuase many Athiest who proclaim
  > a lack
  > > > > > of belife in diety are basiclay lying. They instead have a
  > belife
  > > > > > that such a thing as God does not exist. This then surly
  > explains
  > > > > > their passion.
  >
  > > > > Nonsense. What make us passionate is feeling that people like you
  > are
  > > > > being duped and duping others. It is passion for truth.
  >
  > > > > > On 11 Jan, 22:54, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > > > > > > Well Chaz, it was a reasonable question. Is it so far fetched
  > to be
  > > > > > > surprised that someone who doesn't ascribe to a certain belief
  > can be
  > > > > > > so passionate about his absence of belief? It seems counter-
  > > > > > > intuitive. You would imagine that people get passionate over
  > a
  > > > > > > possession of what they perceive to be "the truth", rather
  > than just
  > > > > > > an absence of belief in the proposition. Get passionate about
  > not
  > > > > > > believing that there is life on mars, for example, seems quite
  > silly.
  > > > > > > Being passionate about believing in life after death, heavenly
  > beings,
  > > > > > > salvation, little green men on mars, doesn't seem quite so out
  > of the
  > > > > > > ordinary to be passionate about.
  >
  > > > > > > On Jan 11, 10:48 am, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > > > > > > > On Jan 10, 6:30 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]>
  > wrote:
  >
  > > > > > > > > Where do Atheists find such passion?
  >
  > > > > > > > What kind of a question is that? You might as ask where do
  > theists get
  > > > > > > > their gaul from.
  > > > > > > > Atheists get their passion from the same place that lions
  > get their
  > > > > > > > roar from; chimps get their urge to throw bananas. We are
  > evolved
  > > > > > > > animals -get over it.
  >
  > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 10:07 am, "Ian Pollard" <[email protected]>
  > wrote:
  >
  > > > > > > > > > Two questions I've been mulling over...
  >
  > > > > > > > > > 1. The recent atheist bus campaign in London, saw buses
  > with the slogan
  > > > > > > > > > "There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy
  > your life." Members
  > > > > > > > > > of Christian Voice -- in attempt to have the adverts
  > removed -- have
  > > > > > > > > > complained to the Advertising Standards Authority about
  > the accuracy of this
  > > > > > > > > > slogan. Would it be correct for atheists to now complain
  > about the accuracy
  > > > > > > > > > of the commercial activities of Christian churches (such
  > as the Alpha
  > > > > > > > > > Course)? Or, in reality, are said atheists far too busy
  > arguing on Internet
  > > > > > > > > > forums about whether the slogan is in fact *agnostic*
  > and what the most
  > > > > > > > > > accurate meaning of the word "probably" is?
  >
  > > > > > > > > > 2. Should John Travolta be brought to trial for child
  > neglect following the
  > > > > > > > > > death of his son? Reports are claiming that his son, who
  > suffered from
  > > > > > > > > > autism, was denied prescription drugs and psychiatric
  > counselling for his
  > > > > > > > > > illness (that could have helped control his seizures)
  > because of his
  > > > > > > > > > father's Scientology beliefs.
  >
  > > > > > > > > > Happy New Year!
  >
  > > > > > > > > > Ian- Hide quoted text -
  >
  > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
  >
  > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
  >
  > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
  >
  > - Show quoted text -
  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to