Quadruple question marks? Bias
and Bigotry? / Slip Disc
Hello Slip Disk....
Hope you accepted my apology...
anything quadruple is one of my trademarks.... (like the usually
quadrupe ellipses). Yes, Bias and bigotry, I think fits.... If the
bigotry definition throws you.... look it up in a good dictionary....
bigotry has other senses or meanings besides the usually thought of
one of race or ethnicity chauvinism or otherwise... Bigotry is
usually, in this broader sense, interchangeable with bias or
prejudice, in the sense of having already made up one's own mind,
prior to the arguement or debate.... Take care of yourself if I don't
catch you on this board again...
nominal9
On Feb 19, 6:11 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are bending and contorting nom. Quadruple question marks? Bias
> and Bigotry?
>
> On Feb 19, 4:58 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug
> > and satisfied is ad hominem. / Chris Jenkins
>
> > Smug and satisfied is ad hominem???? Just goes to show how.... biased
> > and bigoted some moderators can get, especially when someone disagrees
> > with them.... Now, stating that this topic doesn't have "merit"...
> > that's ad hominem.... as well as being self-assuming and feigning
> > intellectual superiority....
> > Ad hominen and ad nauseaum.... wow... two Latin phrases in one
> > posting.....do you know any others, Chris?
> > You know Chris.... there are whole web pages dedicated to so-called
> > Logical or (in most cases, actually) Rhetorical
> > fallacies....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
> > With a few minutes reading.... almost anyone... can learn some
> > definitions and spout off some words as if they know what they are
> > talking about....
> > The difference is that "some" people... like Chazwin... have actually
> > read the original sources where those latin-named "devices" came from,
> > and much more.
> > You tell me, Chris..... would you say that you, yourself, have read
> > (or know) as much as Chazwin?... the guy has a Phd and one or more
> > Masters degrees in diverse areas... get real, Chris. (not that I
> > credit Phd's all that much, myself... I have a joke about that, you
> > may have heard it)
> > How about Kierkecraig?... Or, although I have only gathered the least
> > about him, how about Ian?
> > Talk about being smug and satisfied.... let's add self assuming and
> > feiging intellectual superiority, to that..... and (in my opinion)
> > that isn't an ad hominem attack.... it is a factual, accurate
> > observation.
> > I guess I'm just fishing for a "banning".... but I won't make it too
> > easy for you Chris..... I think I will make it my goal to show you up
> > in your ... faults or lack of learning or preparation..... wherever
> > and whenever I can....shouldn't be too hard....
> > nominal9
>
> > On Feb 19, 12:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I've been participating on threads that have merit. This one doesn't,
> > > except for your mangling of the lyrics to Pink Floyd. The rules of the
> > > group are posted, as are the disciplinary guidelines. We already
> > > talked about this last year. That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug
> > > and satisfied is ad hominem.
>
> > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Well.... Look what the cat dragged in..
> > > > If it isn't Chris Jenkins?
> > > > So, do you and Kierkecraig care to "speak to the issue"? Or are you
> > > > just going to sit there, smug and satisfied, and stand pat...?
> > > > I will let you take the discussion, if any, in whatever direction you
> > > > and the others like.
> > > > nominal9
> > > > On Feb 19, 11:26 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> And the first part, known separately as "The Happiest Days of Our
> > > >> Lives", is as follows:
>
> > > >> Well, when we grew up and went to school,
> > > >> There were certain teachers,
> > > >> Who would hurt the children in any way they could,
> > > >> By pouring their derision,
> > > >> Upon anything we did,
> > > >> Exposing every weakness,
> > > >> However carefully hidden by the kids.
>
> > > >> But in (but in) the town it was well known,
> > > >> When they got home at night,
> > > >> Their fat and psychopathic wives would thrash them,
> > > >> Within inches of their lives.
>
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > Actually, Slip Disc....
> > > >> > the "official" lyrics to the song were as follows....
> > > >> >http://www.pink-floyd-lyrics.com/html/another-brick-2-wall.html
> > > >> > Another Brick in the Wall Part 2 (Waters) 3:56
>
> > > >> > We don't need no education
> > > >> > We dont need no thought control
> > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom
> > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone
> > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
> > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall.
> > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall.
>
> > > >> > We don't need no education
> > > >> > We dont need no thought control
> > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom
> > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone
> > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
> > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall.
> > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall.
>
> > > >> > "Wrong, Do it again!"
> > > >> > "If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you
> > > >> > have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?"
> > > >> > "You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds, stand still laddy!"....
>
> > > >> > nominal9
>
> > > >> > On Feb 19, 11:08 am, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> >> Hello Slip Disc:
>
> > > >> >> Chaz
> > > >> >> frequently committed crimes against other people's rights and
> > > >> >> priviledges. / Vamadevananda
>
> > > >> >> You are correct, it was Vamadevananda who made the "crime"
> > > >> >> assertion.
> > > >> >> My apologies to you Slip Disc for forgetting in the moment of
> > > >> >> writing
> > > >> >> my post. As you may recall, I replied to both of you together, at
> > > >> >> first, and when I later replied to Ornamental mind, wherein I
> > > >> >> mistakenly attributed the "crime" assertion to you, I had forgotten
> > > >> >> which one of you had made it. Again, my apologies. You have your
> > > >> >> right
> > > >> >> to your own opinion, in any case.
>
> > > >> >> Fact is, if I were to address
> > > >> >> you in Chazwin style you most likely would be "offended" by all the
> > > >> >> expletives directed towards your misinterpretation of my post, which
> > > >> >> could also be considered effrontery. / Slip Disc
>
> > > >> >> Oh yeah, I know... I've been on the receiving end of some of
> > > >> >> Chazwin's... "disdainful ridicule" (?), myself. I think it has
> > > >> >> something to do with the "English" or "British" schoolmaster (and
> > > >> >> other such people) style... It may be a little bit after your own
> > > >> >> time, but Chazwin reminds me reminds me of that Pink Floyd song "We
> > > >> >> Don't Need No
> > > >> >> Education"....http://www.hotlyrics.net/lyrics/P/Pink_Floyd/We_Don_t_Need_No_Educati...
>
> > > >> >> (helicopter in background)
>
> > > >> >> (beat)
>
> > > >> >> When we grew up and went to school
> > > >> >> There were certain teachers who would hurt the children any way they
> > > >> >> could
>
> > > >> >> A boring ready region upon anything we did exposing every weakness
> > > >> >> how
> > > >> >> the kid did bye the kid (laughter)
>
> > > >> >> Out in the middle of nowhere they were home at night with friends,
> > > >> >> psychopathic wads would flash down with a inches of their lives
>
> > > >> >> (beat)
>
> > > >> >> We don't need no education
> > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled
> > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room
> > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone
> > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave them kids alone!
>
> > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether you break it no more.
>
> > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether u break it no more.
>
> > > >> >> (british kids)
> > > >> >> We don't need no education
> > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled
> > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room
> > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone
> > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave those kids alone!
>
> > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more.
> > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more.
>
> > > >> >> (beat)
>
> > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding
> > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat
>
> > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding
> > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat
>
> > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding
> > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat
>
> > > >> >> (kids screaming)
> > > >> >> (beeping)
>
> > > >> >> That's Chazwin, there.... yelling "If u dont eat ur meat u kant have
> > > >> >> ne pudding
> > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat"....
>
> > > >> >> Now, you see? That's how I would.... and do.... handle a likeable
> > > >> >> rogue like Chazwin.... he can take it..... not with censorship,
> > > >> >> though... never with censorship.
> > > >> >> Now, of course.... I think that, on this board..... the actual
> > > >> >> "teachers" are really Kierkecraig, Chris Jenkins and whoever else
> > > >> >> happens to be a "moderator"....
> > > >> >> nominal9
>
> > > >> >> On Feb 18, 7:43 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> > I was replying to Slip Disc's "crime" assertion, above. <<
> > > >> >> > Nominal9
>
> > > >> >> > Crime assertion? I merely pointed out the obvious which is well
> > > >> >> > known
> > > >> >> > concerning Chazwin's forum demeanor. Fact is, if I were to
> > > >> >> > address
> > > >> >> > you in Chazwin style you most likely would be "offended" by all
> > > >> >> > the
> > > >> >> > expletives directed towards your misinterpretation of my post,
> > > >> >> > which
> > > >> >> > could also be considered effrontery.
>
> > > >> >> > Again I reiterate: Chazwin was vulgar and out of line with Minds
> > > >> >> > Eye
> > > >> >> > decorum. (that is not a dictum of criminal activity)
>
> > > >> >> > However, if that is not enough for you, I will cite some
> > > >> >> > pertinent
> > > >> >> > points from the Minds Eye Posting Guidelines.
>
> > > >> >> > From Posting Guidelines
>
> > > >> >> > 5. Bannings
>
> > > >> >> > All decisions regarding disciplinary actions up to and including
> > > >> >> > banishment from the group are discussed thoroughly among the
> > > >> >> > moderators before any decision is made. None of the moderators
> > > >> >> > take it
> > > >> >> > upon themselves to discipline a member of the group. Disciplinary
> > > >> >> > actions include, but are not limited to: warnings, return to
> > > >> >> > moderated
> > > >> >> > status, banishment from the group, and ETERNAL DAMNATION.
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
