Thank you for your kind words, Kierkecraig; As to how I have behaved on other forums and why I was (with my own facilitation, I would say) evicted.... that is a matter of opinion. I say that I have always and only... "replied in kind" (and usually with greater style and pannash) to what I received from others.... those others being mostly sysops and moderators. But let that be as it may. The road goes both ways... It is a matter (or a question) of the company that you keep... nominal9
On Feb 19, 7:05 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > Nom, > I've seen how you've behaved on other forums, and if you would have > behaved like that on here I would have probable banned you. However > you have been very decent on this forum, and have contributed a great > deal of very worthy material. Please just chill out. Don't bring > your hobby agenda of bringing down all censorship here. I have no > problem with you talking about the merits of it one way or the other, > but don't add us to your long list of groups you've been banned from. > We like you and wish you would stick around. > > On Feb 19, 3:58 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug > > and satisfied is ad hominem. / Chris Jenkins > > > Smug and satisfied is ad hominem???? Just goes to show how.... biased > > and bigoted some moderators can get, especially when someone disagrees > > with them.... Now, stating that this topic doesn't have "merit"... > > that's ad hominem.... as well as being self-assuming and feigning > > intellectual superiority.... > > Ad hominen and ad nauseaum.... wow... two Latin phrases in one > > posting.....do you know any others, Chris? > > You know Chris.... there are whole web pages dedicated to so-called > > Logical or (in most cases, actually) Rhetorical > > fallacies....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies > > With a few minutes reading.... almost anyone... can learn some > > definitions and spout off some words as if they know what they are > > talking about.... > > The difference is that "some" people... like Chazwin... have actually > > read the original sources where those latin-named "devices" came from, > > and much more. > > You tell me, Chris..... would you say that you, yourself, have read > > (or know) as much as Chazwin?... the guy has a Phd and one or more > > Masters degrees in diverse areas... get real, Chris. (not that I > > credit Phd's all that much, myself... I have a joke about that, you > > may have heard it) > > How about Kierkecraig?... Or, although I have only gathered the least > > about him, how about Ian? > > Talk about being smug and satisfied.... let's add self assuming and > > feiging intellectual superiority, to that..... and (in my opinion) > > that isn't an ad hominem attack.... it is a factual, accurate > > observation. > > I guess I'm just fishing for a "banning".... but I won't make it too > > easy for you Chris..... I think I will make it my goal to show you up > > in your ... faults or lack of learning or preparation..... wherever > > and whenever I can....shouldn't be too hard.... > > nominal9 > > > On Feb 19, 12:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've been participating on threads that have merit. This one doesn't, > > > except for your mangling of the lyrics to Pink Floyd. The rules of the > > > group are posted, as are the disciplinary guidelines. We already > > > talked about this last year. That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug > > > and satisfied is ad hominem. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well.... Look what the cat dragged in.. > > > > If it isn't Chris Jenkins? > > > > So, do you and Kierkecraig care to "speak to the issue"? Or are you > > > > just going to sit there, smug and satisfied, and stand pat...? > > > > I will let you take the discussion, if any, in whatever direction you > > > > and the others like. > > > > nominal9 > > > > On Feb 19, 11:26 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> And the first part, known separately as "The Happiest Days of Our > > > >> Lives", is as follows: > > > > >> Well, when we grew up and went to school, > > > >> There were certain teachers, > > > >> Who would hurt the children in any way they could, > > > >> By pouring their derision, > > > >> Upon anything we did, > > > >> Exposing every weakness, > > > >> However carefully hidden by the kids. > > > > >> But in (but in) the town it was well known, > > > >> When they got home at night, > > > >> Their fat and psychopathic wives would thrash them, > > > >> Within inches of their lives. > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > Actually, Slip Disc.... > > > >> > the "official" lyrics to the song were as follows.... > > > >> >http://www.pink-floyd-lyrics.com/html/another-brick-2-wall.html > > > >> > Another Brick in the Wall Part 2 (Waters) 3:56 > > > > >> > We don't need no education > > > >> > We dont need no thought control > > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom > > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone > > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone! > > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall. > > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall. > > > > >> > We don't need no education > > > >> > We dont need no thought control > > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom > > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone > > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone! > > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall. > > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall. > > > > >> > "Wrong, Do it again!" > > > >> > "If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you > > > >> > have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?" > > > >> > "You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds, stand still laddy!".... > > > > >> > nominal9 > > > > >> > On Feb 19, 11:08 am, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> Hello Slip Disc: > > > > >> >> Chaz > > > >> >> frequently committed crimes against other people's rights and > > > >> >> priviledges. / Vamadevananda > > > > >> >> You are correct, it was Vamadevananda who made the "crime" > > > >> >> assertion. > > > >> >> My apologies to you Slip Disc for forgetting in the moment of > > > >> >> writing > > > >> >> my post. As you may recall, I replied to both of you together, at > > > >> >> first, and when I later replied to Ornamental mind, wherein I > > > >> >> mistakenly attributed the "crime" assertion to you, I had forgotten > > > >> >> which one of you had made it. Again, my apologies. You have your > > > >> >> right > > > >> >> to your own opinion, in any case. > > > > >> >> Fact is, if I were to address > > > >> >> you in Chazwin style you most likely would be "offended" by all the > > > >> >> expletives directed towards your misinterpretation of my post, which > > > >> >> could also be considered effrontery. / Slip Disc > > > > >> >> Oh yeah, I know... I've been on the receiving end of some of > > > >> >> Chazwin's... "disdainful ridicule" (?), myself. I think it has > > > >> >> something to do with the "English" or "British" schoolmaster (and > > > >> >> other such people) style... It may be a little bit after your own > > > >> >> time, but Chazwin reminds me reminds me of that Pink Floyd song "We > > > >> >> Don't Need No > > > >> >> Education"....http://www.hotlyrics.net/lyrics/P/Pink_Floyd/We_Don_t_Need_No_Educati... > > > > >> >> (helicopter in background) > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > >> >> When we grew up and went to school > > > >> >> There were certain teachers who would hurt the children any way they > > > >> >> could > > > > >> >> A boring ready region upon anything we did exposing every weakness > > > >> >> how > > > >> >> the kid did bye the kid (laughter) > > > > >> >> Out in the middle of nowhere they were home at night with friends, > > > >> >> psychopathic wads would flash down with a inches of their lives > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > >> >> We don't need no education > > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled > > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room > > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone > > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave them kids alone! > > > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether you break it no more. > > > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether u break it no more. > > > > >> >> (british kids) > > > >> >> We don't need no education > > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled > > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room > > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone > > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave those kids alone! > > > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more. > > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more. > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > >> >> (kids screaming) > > > >> >> (beeping) > > > > >> >> That's Chazwin, there.... yelling "If u dont eat ur meat u kant have > > > >> >> ne pudding > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat".... > > > > >> >> Now, you see? That's how I would.... and do.... handle a likeable > > > >> >> rogue like Chazwin.... he can take it..... not with censorship, > > > >> >> though... never with censorship. > > > >> >> Now, of course.... I think that, on this board..... the actual > > > >> >> "teachers" are really Kierkecraig, Chris Jenkins and whoever else > > > >> >> happens to be a "moderator".... > > > >> >> nominal9 > > > > >> >> On Feb 18, 7:43 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> > I was replying to Slip Disc's "crime" assertion, above. << > > > >> >> > Nominal9 > > > > >> >> > Crime assertion? I merely pointed out the obvious which is well > > > >> >> > known > > > >> >> > concerning Chazwin's forum demeanor. Fact is, if I were to > > > >> >> > address > > > >> >> > you in Chazwin style you most likely would be "offended" by all > > > >> >> > the > > > >> >> > expletives directed towards your misinterpretation of my post, > > > >> >> > which > > > >> >> > could also be considered effrontery. > > > > >> >> > Again I reiterate: Chazwin was vulgar and out of line with Minds > > > >> >> > Eye > > > >> >> > decorum. (that is not a dictum of criminal activity) > > > > >> >> > However, if that is not enough for you, I will cite some > > > >> >> > pertinent > > > >> >> > points from the Minds Eye Posting Guidelines. > > > > >> >> > From Posting Guidelines > > > > >> >> > 5. Bannings > > > > >> >> > All > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
