Apology accepted, though I didn't think it was all that necessary as I don't think the level of ire within this thread is either. However, you all know each other longer and better than I so you can thrash out as it be your will to do so. I will say that my personal recognition of chaz was at times befuddled by the incongruency of his intellectualism and blatant injections of foul expletives, which creates a discordance that obscures the intention of the posts, as ad hominem attacks usually do. Basically it veers the thread direction off on a tangent thereby rendering it ineffective. There are other groups to which one can belong where the norm is barroom linguistics, verbal assaults and ultimately a foray of distasteful exchange. This is where I find Minds Eye to be an oasis within the world of internet forums, replete with member courtesy and cordiality not found elsewhere. While discourse may encounter opposing views, I see it as argumentative banter. Intelligence is useless without the ability to convey it in a manner that facilitates its reception by others.
I think I'll just fade to black now and let the powers that be find resolve. Good Luck! On Feb 19, 6:28 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > Quadruple question marks? Bias > and Bigotry? / Slip Disc > > Hello Slip Disk.... > Hope you accepted my apology... > anything quadruple is one of my trademarks.... (like the usually > quadrupe ellipses). Yes, Bias and bigotry, I think fits.... If the > bigotry definition throws you.... look it up in a good dictionary.... > bigotry has other senses or meanings besides the usually thought of > one of race or ethnicity chauvinism or otherwise... Bigotry is > usually, in this broader sense, interchangeable with bias or > prejudice, in the sense of having already made up one's own mind, > prior to the arguement or debate.... Take care of yourself if I don't > catch you on this board again... > nominal9 > On Feb 19, 6:11 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You are bending and contorting nom. Quadruple question marks? Bias > > and Bigotry? > > > On Feb 19, 4:58 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug > > > and satisfied is ad hominem. / Chris Jenkins > > > > Smug and satisfied is ad hominem???? Just goes to show how.... biased > > > and bigoted some moderators can get, especially when someone disagrees > > > with them.... Now, stating that this topic doesn't have "merit"... > > > that's ad hominem.... as well as being self-assuming and feigning > > > intellectual superiority.... > > > Ad hominen and ad nauseaum.... wow... two Latin phrases in one > > > posting.....do you know any others, Chris? > > > You know Chris.... there are whole web pages dedicated to so-called > > > Logical or (in most cases, actually) Rhetorical > > > fallacies....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies > > > With a few minutes reading.... almost anyone... can learn some > > > definitions and spout off some words as if they know what they are > > > talking about.... > > > The difference is that "some" people... like Chazwin... have actually > > > read the original sources where those latin-named "devices" came from, > > > and much more. > > > You tell me, Chris..... would you say that you, yourself, have read > > > (or know) as much as Chazwin?... the guy has a Phd and one or more > > > Masters degrees in diverse areas... get real, Chris. (not that I > > > credit Phd's all that much, myself... I have a joke about that, you > > > may have heard it) > > > How about Kierkecraig?... Or, although I have only gathered the least > > > about him, how about Ian? > > > Talk about being smug and satisfied.... let's add self assuming and > > > feiging intellectual superiority, to that..... and (in my opinion) > > > that isn't an ad hominem attack.... it is a factual, accurate > > > observation. > > > I guess I'm just fishing for a "banning".... but I won't make it too > > > easy for you Chris..... I think I will make it my goal to show you up > > > in your ... faults or lack of learning or preparation..... wherever > > > and whenever I can....shouldn't be too hard.... > > > nominal9 > > > > On Feb 19, 12:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've been participating on threads that have merit. This one doesn't, > > > > except for your mangling of the lyrics to Pink Floyd. The rules of the > > > > group are posted, as are the disciplinary guidelines. We already > > > > talked about this last year. That makes this topic ad nauseum. Smug > > > > and satisfied is ad hominem. > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Well.... Look what the cat dragged in.. > > > > > If it isn't Chris Jenkins? > > > > > So, do you and Kierkecraig care to "speak to the issue"? Or are you > > > > > just going to sit there, smug and satisfied, and stand pat...? > > > > > I will let you take the discussion, if any, in whatever direction you > > > > > and the others like. > > > > > nominal9 > > > > > On Feb 19, 11:26 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> And the first part, known separately as "The Happiest Days of Our > > > > >> Lives", is as follows: > > > > > >> Well, when we grew up and went to school, > > > > >> There were certain teachers, > > > > >> Who would hurt the children in any way they could, > > > > >> By pouring their derision, > > > > >> Upon anything we did, > > > > >> Exposing every weakness, > > > > >> However carefully hidden by the kids. > > > > > >> But in (but in) the town it was well known, > > > > >> When they got home at night, > > > > >> Their fat and psychopathic wives would thrash them, > > > > >> Within inches of their lives. > > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > Actually, Slip Disc.... > > > > >> > the "official" lyrics to the song were as follows.... > > > > >> >http://www.pink-floyd-lyrics.com/html/another-brick-2-wall.html > > > > >> > Another Brick in the Wall Part 2 (Waters) 3:56 > > > > > >> > We don't need no education > > > > >> > We dont need no thought control > > > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom > > > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone > > > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone! > > > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall. > > > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall. > > > > > >> > We don't need no education > > > > >> > We dont need no thought control > > > > >> > No dark sarcasm in the classroom > > > > >> > Teachers leave them kids alone > > > > >> > Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone! > > > > >> > All in all it's just another brick in the wall. > > > > >> > All in all you're just another brick in the wall. > > > > > >> > "Wrong, Do it again!" > > > > >> > "If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you > > > > >> > have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?" > > > > >> > "You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds, stand still laddy!".... > > > > > >> > nominal9 > > > > > >> > On Feb 19, 11:08 am, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> Hello Slip Disc: > > > > > >> >> Chaz > > > > >> >> frequently committed crimes against other people's rights and > > > > >> >> priviledges. / Vamadevananda > > > > > >> >> You are correct, it was Vamadevananda who made the "crime" > > > > >> >> assertion. > > > > >> >> My apologies to you Slip Disc for forgetting in the moment of > > > > >> >> writing > > > > >> >> my post. As you may recall, I replied to both of you together, at > > > > >> >> first, and when I later replied to Ornamental mind, wherein I > > > > >> >> mistakenly attributed the "crime" assertion to you, I had > > > > >> >> forgotten > > > > >> >> which one of you had made it. Again, my apologies. You have your > > > > >> >> right > > > > >> >> to your own opinion, in any case. > > > > > >> >> Fact is, if I were to address > > > > >> >> you in Chazwin style you most likely would be "offended" by all > > > > >> >> the > > > > >> >> expletives directed towards your misinterpretation of my post, > > > > >> >> which > > > > >> >> could also be considered effrontery. / Slip Disc > > > > > >> >> Oh yeah, I know... I've been on the receiving end of some of > > > > >> >> Chazwin's... "disdainful ridicule" (?), myself. I think it has > > > > >> >> something to do with the "English" or "British" schoolmaster (and > > > > >> >> other such people) style... It may be a little bit after your own > > > > >> >> time, but Chazwin reminds me reminds me of that Pink Floyd song > > > > >> >> "We > > > > >> >> Don't Need No > > > > >> >> Education"....http://www.hotlyrics.net/lyrics/P/Pink_Floyd/We_Don_t_Need_No_Educati... > > > > > >> >> (helicopter in background) > > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > > >> >> When we grew up and went to school > > > > >> >> There were certain teachers who would hurt the children any way > > > > >> >> they > > > > >> >> could > > > > > >> >> A boring ready region upon anything we did exposing every > > > > >> >> weakness how > > > > >> >> the kid did bye the kid (laughter) > > > > > >> >> Out in the middle of nowhere they were home at night with friends, > > > > >> >> psychopathic wads would flash down with a inches of their lives > > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > > >> >> We don't need no education > > > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled > > > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room > > > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone > > > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave them kids alone! > > > > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether you break it no more. > > > > > >> >> All alone you're just eight whether u break it no more. > > > > > >> >> (british kids) > > > > >> >> We don't need no education > > > > >> >> We don't need no thoughts controlled > > > > >> >> There is no sarcasm in the class room > > > > >> >> Teachers leave them kids alone > > > > >> >> (yells) hey teachers leave those kids alone! > > > > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more. > > > > >> >> All alone ur just a... Whether u break it no more. > > > > > >> >> (beat) > > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > > >> >> If u dont eat ur meat u kant have ne pudding > > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat > > > > > >> >> (kids screaming) > > > > >> >> (beeping) > > > > > >> >> That's Chazwin, there.... yelling "If u dont eat ur meat u kant > > > > >> >> have > > > > >> >> ne pudding > > > > >> >> How kan u have any pudding if u dont eat ur meat".... > > > > > >> >> Now, you see? That's how I would.... and do.... handle a likeable > > > > >> >> rogue like Chazwin.... he can take it..... not with censorship, > > > > >> >> though... never with censorship. > > > > >> >> Now, of course.... I think that, on this board..... the actual > > > > >> >> "teachers" are really Kierkecraig, Chris Jenkins and whoever else > > > > >> >> happens to be a "moderator".... > > > > >> >> nominal9 > > > > > >> >> On Feb 18, 7:43 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> >> > I was replying to Slip Disc's "crime" assertion, above. << > > > > >> >> > Nominal9 > > > > > >> >> > Crime assertion? I merely pointed out the obvious which is > > > > >> >> > well known > > > > >> >> > concerning Chazwin's forum demeanor. > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
