That though is a whole barrel of worms.

Really, and I mean really, can you think of any act in which no harm
to others has been created?

On 8 Apr, 07:47, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don you are right  even though we have low subsidized rates there seems to
> be a greed factor.
>
> Doing things for personal gain is the only honest way to live your
> life.  I do things all the time because I know loved ones appreciate
> it and love me back and do stuff for me.  I'm selfish to the core.  I
> love the attention.
>
> I agree doing things for personal gain is of value,,  when the personal gain
> harms your fellow man, it is not and can not be morally considered honest.
>
> Can you consider excessive bonuses to people who's actions caused a
> corporation to fail honest especially when this comes out of taxpayers
> pockets?.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >  A possible solution may be for the state to subsidise the cost of
> > > study and training, so that doctors are not under such pressure to
> > > make " so much " in the shortest possible time ( yesterday ! ).
>
> > We do that already through very low interest rate loans for collage
> > students and grants and scholarships.
>
> > dj
>
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Vamadevananda <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > You may be missing the point. Is a doctor moral if he chooses to let a
> > > patient die if he is not paid " so much," when he is actually in a
> > > position to save the life ?
>
> > > A possible solution may be for the state to subsidise the cost of
> > > study and training, so that doctors are not under such pressure to
> > > make " so much " in the shortest possible time ( yesterday ! ).
>
> > > I recall Dr Rieux's character in The Plague, written by Albert Camus.
>
> > > On Apr 7, 7:32 pm, Michael Berkovits <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Agree with Molly.  I don't understand any of the financial arguments
> > >> presented.
>
> > >> Some people cut trees down for a living, and make a certain amount of
> > >> money per year doing it.  Some people lend money for a living, and
> > >> make a certain amount of money per year doing it.  In the former case,
> > >> you trade the trees for money.  In the latter case, it's the
> > >> difference between what the borrowing rate and the interest rate that
> > >> lets you make money.  Nothing immoral about it. Only reason some
> > >> people, and various religions, feel that charging interest is immoral
> > >> is because of the fact that we didn't really evolve to understand
> > >> abstract ways of making money.  Sell wood? Sure.  Make a living off a
> > >> spread? Harder to understand. But why immoral?
>
> > >> As for medicine: Why are doctors paid so much? Because they're among
> > >> the more talented people in society (i.e., intelligent - look at
> > >> medical school acceptance rates), and they spend much longer in
> > >> training than other people, so they have to be compensated by a lot to
> > >> make the profession economically worthwhile. If doctors were paid
> > >> less, more people who would otherwise be doctors would become lawyers,
> > >> and medical care wouldn't be as good as it is now. So where would the
> > >> morality be in that? Is every potential doctor who chooses to be a
> > >> lawyer because the pay's better an immoral person?
>
> > >> On Apr 7, 2:55 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > Frayed knot is an interesting way of putting it.
>
> > >> > I think society is more immoral than moral. I think most people agree
> > that
> > >> > killing some one is wrong.  My problem  with morality is when some one
> > >> > charges excessive interest like in credit cards (my wife and I have
> > one --
> > >> > and it is for emergencies only  -- then immediately paid off )
> >  justifying
> > >> > this as sound business when in reality to me it seems like this greed
> > is a
> > >> > way of slowly killing some one, or Like ( i do  have a very good
> > health
> > >> > insurance.) when I ended up in the hospital a few years back in the
> > USA and
> > >> > the bill exceeded $8,000. for 24 hour stay..  basically to get my
> > heart beat
> > >> > stabilized and watched. I saw 2 doctors for a total of 10 minutes..
> > >> > If I did not have insurance i would have an huge medical bill and to
> > pay it
> > >> > I would have had to take food of my table to pay the bill. To me if a
> > person
> > >> > is forced to pay an excessive amount to cover a bill cutting back on
> > normal
> > >> > expenses to pay it,, the hospital is killing that person.
>
> > >> > or by charging excessive rent.. or a myriad of other ways of killing
> > some
> > >> > one legally .. the slower the better..
>
> > >> > On my savings account I am paid a meager 2.6 % but if I want to borrow
> > money
> > >> > I have to pay 9.8% If I depended upon that interest for my living
> > again
> > >> > corporate greed would be killing me..  and this difference is immoral
> > yet it
> > >> > is easily justified as business.
>
> > >> > I think people many people only want to appear to be moral  yet at the
> > same
> > >> > time want to use business or corporations to hide their immorality.
>
> > >> > The only conclusion I can reach is people prefer to be immoral. Just
> > talking
> > >> > the talk not walking the walk of morality.
>
> > >> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> > > Evil reconciled to good?  Frayed knot!
>
> > >> > > On Apr 5, 10:18 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > Why is evil always so hard to nail down or why does it seem that
> > no
> > >> > > > one really wants to identify it but simply dissect the
> > potentiality of
> > >> > > > what it may define. You don't consider anything on the video as
> > evil
> > >> > > > but do recognize it as bad, horrifying and obscene, which
> > basically
> > >> > > > covers the face of evil, but rather bypass evil representation to
> > >> > > > bring attention to religious aspects, which by the way I agree
> > with
> > >> > > > 100%, don't burn your steak here. The dark ages are still upon us
> > >> > > > brother and while technology creates a vision of advancement,
> > >> > > > attitudes and behaviours create a different picture, the picture
> > of
> > >> > > > reality, of good and of evil.  I feel we must somehow find resolve
> > in
> > >> > > > the issue of what is evil.  We have here a collection of brilliant
> > >> > > > minds, myself excluded lol, and so we can somehow be assertive in
> > our
> > >> > > > resolve.  I find too many threads wind up as fray ends.  Which
> > reminds
> > >> > > > me of a thread that walked into a bar, the bartender said "we
> > don't
> > >> > > > serve threads", so the thread walked out, shredded out it's end
> > and
> > >> > > > tied itself into a loop, walked back into the bar, the bartender
> > >> > > > noticed and immediately and irately said, "damn, I told you we
> > don't
> > >> > > > serve threads in here", the thread responded "I'm not a thread" at
> > >> > > > which the bartender scowled, "you are so" and so the thread having
> > the
> > >> > > > last word said "nope, I'm a frayed knot".
>
> > >> > > > On Apr 5, 12:26 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > Thanks Slip.  I don't really consider what is going on in the
> > video
> > >> > > > > and what it represents as evil.  It is bad, it is horrifying, it
> > is
> > >> > > > > obscene, but it is also no more than religion battling it's
> > fiercest
> > >> > > > > foe -- education and enlightenment.  On the other hand, religion
> > >> > > > > considers education and enlightenment evil -- the work of the
> > devil.
>
> > >> > > > > On Apr 4, 2:05 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > Thanks for the video gruff, it was overwhelmingly sad but very
> > >> > > > > > enlightening as to the seriousness and the dilemma of these
> > people.
> > >> > > It
> > >> > > > > > takes me back over to the other thread, Does Evil Exist.  One
> > only
> > >> > > > > > needs to watch this video for the answer.
>
> > >> > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:38 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > Here is a good reason for moral behavior -- call it what you
> > like
> > >> > > (we
> > >> > > > > > > are our brother's keeper, the golden rule, do unto others,
> > etc.) --
>
> >http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/02/22/world/asia/1194838044017/cl...
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > (
> > >> >  )
> > >> > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> (
>  )
> I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to