It is not ad hom but an expression of his belief mistaken though it
is.

You seem to be a bit uptight.




On May 20, 10:19 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tinker, your third paragraph is clear ad hominem. I'm getting a little tired
> of repeating myself about the posting guidelines. Take it down or you go
> back on moderation.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You start off making a claim to superiority with imaginary back up,
> > ooohh you're so smart.
>
> > I know that they can cause your superior spiritual feeling by
> > suppressing the orientation center in the brain of anyone, including
> > atheist.
>
> > The collective intelligence is the source of insight, inspiration and
> > revelation. If you don't understand that you're a lot stupider than
> > you make out for atheist to be.
>
> > So you are ignorant of Jehovah? You deny the supreme being that is the
> > one true God. You are an atheist and all of the crap you have been
> > spewing is yours to own. Suck it up :-)
> > I know your 'transcendental', it is escapism because you haven't the
> > ability to deal with Life as it is here and now.
>
> > You haven't done anything but flaunt yourself as being spiritually
> > superior.
> > I'm an obnoxious know it all type and you make me look meek and
> > humble :-)
>
> > peace & Love
>
> > On May 20, 7:22 pm, omprem <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On May 20, 5:04 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 20, 8:39 am, omprem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 19, 8:05 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You are so right, attachment to Life is an addiction, if you are
> > not
> > > > > > attached to Life you are DEAD.
>
> > > > > OMPREM:  Nope. All death means is a change of venue: 'you' still
> > exist
> > > > > in another form on another plane of existence.
>
> > > > Prove it. Die, then repeat that statement, I'll be listening :-)
>
> > > OMPREM:  If you had the capacity to hear astral beings you would not
> > > be here whining about them.
>
> > > > > > It is total BS to say Life is an obstacle to accessing God. If you
> > are
> > > > > > dead your brain does Not generate the mind which is the only means
> > by
> > > > > > which any person here and now or at any time in the past has ever
> > > > > > accessed God.
>
> > > > > OMPREM: There are many centers of consciousness besides the mind.
> > > > > Moreover, the mind survives death along with everything else except
> > > > > the physical body.  Your mistake is to  equate the mind and
> > > > > consciousness as originating with brain function.
>
> > > > There is one center of consciousness, the brain. Your fantasy has no
> > > > substance, my brain does.
> > > > I'm very familiar with the realm of your beliefs.  I know what you're
> > > > talking about and it is your imagination boosted by dogma.
>
> > > OMPREM: You are sadly out of touch even with 'discoveries' in the
> > > scientific community. You could start with Dr. Candace Pert's,
> > > Molecules of Emotion and then get back to me.  It's OK, go ahead,
> > > google her because I know you have not heard of her.
>
> > > > > > Your dogma is nothing but one of many different descriptions of
> > > > > > something that is common to all mankind. The connection in our
> > brain
> > > > > > generated mind is to our collective intelligence and it's called by
> > a
> > > > > > hundred different names to support ones own personal glorification
> > and
> > > > > > excuse to put someone else down as inferior.
>
> > > > > OMPREM:  Wrong. But the answer is right in front of you. If it is the
> > > > > brain that is totally responsible for the existence of the mind how
> > > > > then can there be 'collective intelligence'?
>
> > > > The brain produces an energy that reaches beyond the physical being
> > > > and unites as the collective intelligence. It's very simple, no
> > > > mystical BS about it.
>
> > > OMPREM: This is too good to pass up. Now I know you atheists claim to
> > > value reason, logic and empiricism so show me this 'collective
> > > intelligence' and tell me how you know about it (on an empirical basis
> > > of course.) Is it something like the collective intelligence of
> > > lemmings as they hurtle over the cliff?
>
> > > > > According to your brain = consciousness theory there can only be
> > conventionally-held beliefs,
> > > > > that is individual beliefs that people have also agreed upon.
>
> > > > How do you come up with that? My brain = consciousness theory?
>
> > > >  But
>
> > > > > 'collective intelligence' which you also claim to believe in is
> > > > > different from those conventional beliefs. With 'collective
> > > > > intelligence' you are getting into Oneness and the paranormal, two
> > > > > areas that atheists deny.
>
> > > > The collective intelligence doesn't store BS. I'm an atheist by any
> > > > dogmatic definition of God. I understand the One and know there are
> > > > 'paranormal' things.
> > > > Your ignorance of what an atheist believes is showing :-)
>
> > > OMPREM:  You seem to be labouring under the misconception that
> > > religion posits an individualized God and you are wrong. No religion
> > > claims that God is an individual.
>
> > > Here's a hint: Religions say God is everywhere all the time and that
> > > it is all God. This, of course, means that God is not an individual
> > > because for God to be an individual there has to be somewhere where
> > > God is not which not possible according to religions. Do you get it
> > > now?
>
> > > > > > You need to get over your personal claim to superiority and
> > recognize
> > > > > > the fact that our collective intelligence is God, as far as Life on
> > > > > > Earth is concerned. Your personal dogma is the support of
> > selfishness.
> > > > > > And the world is going down the tube because of it.
> > > > > OMPREM: I agree that collective intelligence is God but so too
> > > > > therefore must each part of the collective intelligence be God. It's
> > > > > all God.
>
> > > > Yes. So?
> > > >  It is your refusal to accept your own true nature and leads
>
> > > > > you to mistakenly categorize others who do so as 'selfish'.
>
> > > > I Am, a Live human. There is no selfishness to that claim by any
> > > > other.
>
> > > OMPREM: This is another mistake that atheists make. They focus
> > > exclusively on the physical aspect of being human and are completely
> > > unaware of the transcendental aspect. More sadly, because of their
> > > type of  consciousness that locks them into sense impressions, they
> > > are utterly incapable of knowing the transcendental about themselves.
>
> > > >  Those
> > > > > others, such as me, who are aware of and identify with their Divine
> > > > > nature are most assuredly not selfish because to be selfish is to be
> > > > > unaware of one's ultimate nature and to think of themselves as
> > > > > individual entities.
>
> > > > To flaunt your divine nature for self glorification and to claim
> > > > superiority IS selfish.
>
> > > OMPREM: And yet I didn't do that.
>
> > > >  Selfish is to stand outside of that collective
>
> > > > > consciousness and not know God. That seems to describe you by your
> > own
> > > > > admission. But all works out over time.
>
> > > > So you are saying that somebody can separate them self from the One?
> > > > I can't do that.
>
> > > >  peace & Love
>
> > > > > > On May 19, 1:32 pm, omprem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Patanjali said that attachment to life is an addiction and an
> > obstacle
> > > > > > > to accessing God.
>
> > > > > > > In addition, there is a bit of equivocation on the use of the
> > phrase
> > > > > > > 'has to use' as opposed to 'uses'. The difference is quite
> > > > > > > pronounced.
>
> > > > > > > On May 19, 11:28 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > RE: addiction
> > > > > > > > Many years ago, a very wise friend of mine defined
> > quantitatively what
> > > > > > > > addiction was in a startling, to me, way. He said that anything
> > (not
> > > > > > > > needed for life/sustenance) that one has to use at least once
> > every
> > > > > > > > two weeks represented an addiction….of sorts. Here, I’m using a
> > > > > > > > specific meaning for the term…more like a psychic compensation.
>
> > > > > > > > On May 19, 4:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > So your addicted too, fran?  Gee, where would you place
> > yourself on
> > > > > > > > > the oomp scale of 1 to 10 on coffee addiction?
>
> > > > > > > > > On May 19, 3:30 am, frantheman <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Hey, ID, I visited the Netherlands for a couple of hours
> > last Friday!
> > > > > > > > > > One of the items I stocked up on was original Senseo coffee
> > pads, they
> > > > > > > > > > cost twice as much in Germany :-)
>
> > > > > > > > > > On 19 Mai, 09:18, iam deheretic <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > You haven't told me what you have difficult about my
> > comments.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > That is easy enough i believe  you would sit in copyright
> > infringement,
> > > > > > > > > > > simply because what you have said about spirituality is
> > not original.. most
> > > > > > > > > > > of it is either quoted or paraphrased from what others
> > have said. As I read
> > > > > > > > > > > what you say I find it difficult to believe you are not a
> > fundamentalist
> > > > > > > > > > > christian, despite what you say to the contrary. They can
> > talk a lot of talk
> > > > > > > > > > > but sadly they tend to lack insight as to the meaning of
> > the words they say,
> > > > > > > > > > > as a group. But there are some that do tend to rise above
> > this tendency.
> > > > > > > > > > > Your hatred of others and their belief show me that you
> > are insecure in your
> > > > > > > > > > > own beliefs, and there is a lot of confusion going on
> > within you. Your
> > > > > > > > > > > hatred of atheist tells me you are afraid you are one
> > deep inside, and that
> > > > > > > > > > > frightens you
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to