Thank you Slip. I've had high hopes of you from the beginning. I've recently told that I've been working on this for over eight years. I have also told that I have been impeccably honest. The times I said "I can't" were true in the fact that I was following a plan trying another way of breaking through. "I do have a pretty sure idea of what will Not work.", comes from the eight years of experience. The pattern of animosity developing and my relating it to 'the fear of the unknown" is also well grounded with repeated similar experiences.
The plan has run its course. The results were absolutely typical, until yesterday. Lee asked the question, and I felt (hoped and prayed) that you were on the verge of asking, and you did today. I sent him this link and asked that he not reveal it for a few days. www.BLTR.org It's a very simple, but that simplicity 'must' be preserved by simply "*teaching the world a word*". If an explanation of how it will work becomes involved in the 'mass presentation' it will become like a religion and fail. Thanks again man. I Love you. peace & Love On Jul 11, 3:00 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > The thread I misquoted was actually "Collective Mentality" back in > April. It covers 112 posts in all, much of which I have just scanned > through. > > A portion within the post on April 27 @ 10:47 pm you Tinker state>>>" > I think we need to > do something to get everybody off into it for a meeting to bring about > the change." > > You continue in other posts to state>> "I can't say exactly how it > will be done. " > > You also state>>"I'm thinking there is a way to make a connection to > bring that 'super > mind' forward in our conscious mind. " > > You reiterate with>>"Again, I can't actually say how it will be done. > I do have a pretty > sure idea of what will Not work. " > > You said you were working on a thread titled The Wrong Way which I > don't imagine would contain any solutions but recognition of noted > failures, all of which I would likely agree with, but we still remain > without a way and means of accomplishing the collective. > > You suggested>>"We have to create a focus point in the separation." > and "The 'thing' in our mind?" > > This is where it all starts to unravel, the creation of the "Thing". > > You continue with>>"The focus point would be the beginning of unity." > > Now we have the focus point, the thing and unity. > > You then reply to heretic with>>"Allan, we are not talking about > starting another religion. > We are looking at the root of all religion, which is intentionally > good, and seeking a way to make it a common link amongst mankind > without all the BS. " > > Still there is not a shred of direction but more recognition. > > You address Rosey with>>"I believe the purpose of this discussion is > to find the key to " how " > > Ah but yet another clue to the ongoing dilemma of the "how" which has > gone full circle to where we are now, probably several times over. > > You finalize a paragraph to e space with "I think we need a way to > make it common knowledge." > > So you are still stuck in the mud of perplexity with needing a way. > > And so that ends your contribution to the Collective Mentality > thread. > > So a quick rehash here>> > > You think we need to do something but you don't know what. > Your thinking there is a way, you don't know what it is but you are > sure of all the ways it isn't. > You know that a focus point is needed in order for a "thing" to begin > a unity. > You are seeking a way and want to find the key that unlocks the answer > to "how?" > > Okay, so now the question about what I don't understand! > > How should we go about facilitating your "idea"? > > Slip, R.I.P. > > On Jul 10, 11:04 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Slip, you started the 'Collective Consciousness' thread after our > > private conversation where I said; > > "I got this thing in my head saying there's a way to 'hook up' > > everybody to the collective intelligence. I need help to bring it out > > and make sense out of it. > > That is what brought me to Mind's Eye." > > > You went off on the tangent from the idea I presented to you. You went > > straight into the 'pattern' that has to be broken for us to change the > > ways of Society. > > > I am not evasive. You will not ask questions. > > I have presented the idea of establishing a common point of > > understanding as the beginning point of Unity. > > I have said that we need to recognize the common connection in our > > mind with a universal symbol for that common point of understanding. > > I have presented "the Feeling" as the way to recognize that > > connection. > > > Please, please, please, ask a question about what you don't > > understand. What more do you want to know? > > > peace & Love > > > On Jul 9, 10:57 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think it would be better if you were where I am, but OK, let's start > > > from "square one". YOU lay out the road map, or the instructional > > > plan, or the owners manual to your "Unique Idea" and then "WE" can > > > possibly see exactly what this idea is other than an "IDEA". We were > > > together on the collective consciousness thread which I started but > > > somehow you have gone off on some obscure tangent which is void of > > > description and you continually remain evasive in face of membership > > > requests for specifics. I haven't forgotten your post long gone in > > > which you tell tale of your subtleties which are intentionally > > > antagonistic and in which you claim to have been really good at. The > > > cat and mouse games are boring so spell it out clearly, succinctly, > > > concisely and perhaps "WE" can "SEE" your "Unique" idea. So far I > > > don't see anything that even remotely resembles an earnest attempt > > > other than that of the dangling bait technique, which is by now > > > getting very tiring. Yesterday is gone, tomorrow is yet to come and > > > the future is wide open, so set the course, but at least make it > > > legible. > > > > On Jul 9, 7:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If your mind was there, you would be where I am, you are not. > > > > > Yes it is a unique idea, I'm sorry you can't see it. > > > > > If you did see it you would know how "the segment of humanity that > > > > "does not want unity"" would be affected by our higher power. > > > > > I really do appreciate your concerned guidance. I've no interest in > > > > becoming a martyr. > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > On Jul 9, 5:17 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm afraid that you don't seem to understand is that my mind is > > > > > "there", as are others. You don't have a new or exclusive idea. Get > > > > > off the cloud Tinker. > > > > > Aside from that there is a problematic mammoth starring you in the > > > > > face, one that you fail to address, that being the segment of humanity > > > > > that "does not want unity". They don't want your peace and love! > > > > > I think you should spend more time "talking" to them about your idea > > > > > in hopes that they might not consider chopping your head off and > > > > > putting it on the end of a pole. > > > > > > On Jul 8, 11:48 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The riddler has provided the answer, you do not allow your mind to > > > > > > explore the possibility. > > > > > > > We can establish a common point of understanding for Unity to begin, > > > > > > let your mind go there. > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 11:17 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Why bother when the riddler can simply provide the answer, > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > you have yet to do, I have enough taxing my mind as it is without > > > > > > > entertaining your mental goads. > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 9:23 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > My friend, riddles have answers if you'll let your mind explore > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > possibility :-) > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 12:52 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think riddles are your forte tink. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 6:27 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Not the same at all, hatred comes from denial of the > > > > > > > > > > connection that > > > > > > > > > > is our common link. > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 3:40 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > And in a similar vein, feelimg of the opposite. Yep I > > > > > > > > > > > guess we can be > > > > > > > > > > > united in both love and hate. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 July, 00:59, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Lee, there is something we can all agree on. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is, the Feeling of the connection in our min, to > > > > > > > > > > > > that which is > > > > > > > > > > > > other than our physical realm. The Feeling of goodness, > > > > > > > > > > > > of Love and of > > > > > > > > > > > > beauty, and/or the Feeling of, cosmic consciousness > > > > > > > > > > > > and/or the > > > > > > > > > > > > presence of God, is something that can be established > > > > > > > > > > > > as the common > > > > > > > > > > > > link of mankind. > > > > > > > > > > > > It can cross the barriers of language and culture to > > > > > > > > > > > > establish a > > > > > > > > > > > > beginning point of Unity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 6, 8:36 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ohh I don't know. We are all the same species, there > > > > > > > > > > > > > must be > > > > > > > > > > > > > something that we can all agree on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean if I punch a German in the face, I can almost > > > > > > > > > > > > > garentee that the > > > > > > > > > > > > > look on said face will be virtualy the same as the > > > > > > > > > > > > > look an Egyptian > > > > > > > > > > > > > would give me following the same treatment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which put another less wordy way means, we all react > > > > > > > > > > > > > to pain in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > same way, and I would guess happiness also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 July, 23:21, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That you doubt the inherent value of our common > > > > > > > > > > > > > > source doesn't matter, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you know it IS :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The I Ching, the Bible, the Koran and any other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > theology or philosophy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that pretends to teach "the way" for mankind, yes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No dogma or idealism will ever be able to cross the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > barriers of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > language and culture to establish Unity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 1:11 pm, gruff <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We may have started as one but we are many now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and whether we will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another sense we are all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one since we had a common beginning but I doubt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is of any > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
