I appreciate your bluntness, Allan. You can believe anything you want, the story is absolutely true in every part. If you need any additional information from me to do "some inquiring", please let me know.
peace & Love On Jul 13, 1:38 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > Tink, I am going to be very very blunt. I personally don't buy your story I > think it is a work of fiction and I am going to leave it at that. So don't > push the issue with me or I might look into it in the future and do some > inquiring of which I will receive no reply but if what you wrote is true you > don't want to challenge me as I am only 12 km away from where I will ask my > inquiries. > Remember Tink, I am American by birth not a Dutchie. > Allan > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for your concern my friend, I wouldn't trade my Life's history > > with ANYBODY. I have an extraordinary wealth of Life experience. That > > little story just touched on a particular line of events that had led > > to a point of reconstruction of Life knowledge. There's a ton of more > > hard times and trials that you all could cry about, that I laugh at > > and appreciate the knowledge gained. > > > "Tinker > > To say that any portion of energy is confined to a positive > > attribution is qualifying it in such a way as to negate thousands of > > other aspects of the cosmos, theoretical as well as empirical." - SD > > > No sir, it is simply identifying a specific for consideration. > > > "Description of collectivism and cosmic energy may be ineffable to say > > the least, especially when considering that some of the most brilliant > > minds in the world have yet to come to terms with it." - SD > > > Does that mean, no one can progress further? Can we not take the > > knowledge of brilliant minds from different places, bring them > > together and add them up? The sum will be greater than the parts, yes? > > > "I certainly don't have much of an understanding of it other than from > > the personal > > experiences with it." - SD > > > If you work with me you will have :-) > > > "Still we can move forward to explore humanity's relationship with it, > > the corresponding effects of it and overall the deeper understanding > > of it." > > > Forward Ho!!! > > > peace & Love > > > On Jul 12, 11:15 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > First off, in a way I'm sorry your history has been laid out in > > > clothes line form, though I must say that I have had in the past > > > certain feelings about the history. I remember several of my posts > > > suggested that you drop the yesterdays and I felt you had much time > > > spent in contemplation. I pointed to riddles as your forte and now > > > see reasons behind leaving out specifics. I don't view in any way > > > your life history as any detriment to society, the world or yourself > > > and in fact feel that it is pertinent the wisdom thread in that your > > > time and experience may be part of what we/some call wisdom and it > > > should be explored in the light. > > > > As far as the bltr link I have reiterate my reply to you back in April > > > before you presented the link and as a response to your > > > statement....................... > > > > > > The sum total of energy involved in mankind's interactions on and > > with > > > > > the planet Earth, is the subset. > > > > > The energy is cosmic energy. > > > > > > I believe that within the subset free will allows us to act > > > > > 'negatively'. Our collective intelligence is a 'positive' > > metaphysical > > > > > balance that maintains the cosmic balance within the subset. > > <<<Tinker > > > > On Apr 21, 10:49 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't know, it seems like a conglomeration of many aspects with much > > > > broader meanings. Perhaps as a synopsis it could pass as a viable > > > > statement. Free will allows us to act either way and so the > > > > collective intelligence is not confined to either polarity. One can > > > > effect negative change equally as in voodoo or witchcraft. To posit > > > > that collective intelligence is a 'positive' metaphysical balance that > > > > "maintains" anything seems farfetched. Fact is, simple observation > > > > reveals that if anything there is more unbalance within the subset due > > > > to the incongruity of individual understanding of cosmic energy > > > > existing around us. If anything needs maintenance it IS the > > > > collective intelligence not cosmic balance. > > > > Tinker > > > To say that any portion of energy is confined to a positive > > > attribution is qualifying it in such a way as to negate thousands of > > > other aspects of the cosmos, theoretical as well as empirical. > > > Description of collectivism and cosmic energy may be ineffable to say > > > the least, especially when considering that some of the most brilliant > > > minds in the world have yet to come to terms with it. I certainly > > > don't have much of an understanding of it other than from the personal > > > experiences with it. > > > > Still we can move forward to explore humanity's relationship with it, > > > the corresponding effects of it and overall the deeper understanding > > > of it. > > > > On Jul 11, 7:18 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thank you Slip. > > > > I've had high hopes of you from the beginning. > > > > I've recently told that I've been working on this for over eight > > > > years. I have also told that I have been impeccably honest. > > > > The times I said "I can't" were true in the fact that I was following > > > > a plan trying another way of breaking through. "I do have a pretty > > > > sure idea of what will Not work.", comes from the eight years of > > > > experience. The pattern of animosity developing and my relating it to > > > > 'the fear of the unknown" is also well grounded with repeated similar > > > > experiences. > > > > > The plan has run its course. The results were absolutely typical, > > > > until yesterday. > > > > Lee asked the question, and I felt (hoped and prayed) that you were on > > > > the verge of asking, and you did today. > > > > I sent him this link and asked that he not reveal it for a few > > days.www.BLTR.org > > > > > It's a very simple, but that simplicity 'must' be preserved by simply > > > > "*teaching the world a word*". If an explanation of how it will work > > > > becomes involved in the 'mass presentation' it will become like a > > > > religion and fail. > > > > > Thanks again man. I Love you. > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > On Jul 11, 3:00 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The thread I misquoted was actually "Collective Mentality" back in > > > > > April. It covers 112 posts in all, much of which I have just scanned > > > > > through. > > > > > > A portion within the post on April 27 @ 10:47 pm you Tinker state>>>" > > > > > I think we need to > > > > > do something to get everybody off into it for a meeting to bring > > about > > > > > the change." > > > > > > You continue in other posts to state>> "I can't say exactly how it > > > > > will be done. " > > > > > > You also state>>"I'm thinking there is a way to make a connection to > > > > > bring that 'super > > > > > mind' forward in our conscious mind. " > > > > > > You reiterate with>>"Again, I can't actually say how it will be done. > > > > > I do have a pretty > > > > > sure idea of what will Not work. " > > > > > > You said you were working on a thread titled The Wrong Way which I > > > > > don't imagine would contain any solutions but recognition of noted > > > > > failures, all of which I would likely agree with, but we still remain > > > > > without a way and means of accomplishing the collective. > > > > > > You suggested>>"We have to create a focus point in the separation." > > > > > and "The 'thing' in our mind?" > > > > > > This is where it all starts to unravel, the creation of the "Thing". > > > > > > You continue with>>"The focus point would be the beginning of unity." > > > > > > Now we have the focus point, the thing and unity. > > > > > > You then reply to heretic with>>"Allan, we are not talking about > > > > > starting another religion. > > > > > We are looking at the root of all religion, which is intentionally > > > > > good, and seeking a way to make it a common link amongst mankind > > > > > without all the BS. " > > > > > > Still there is not a shred of direction but more recognition. > > > > > > You address Rosey with>>"I believe the purpose of this discussion is > > > > > to find the key to " how " > > > > > > Ah but yet another clue to the ongoing dilemma of the "how" which has > > > > > gone full circle to where we are now, probably several times over. > > > > > > You finalize a paragraph to e space with "I think we need a way to > > > > > make it common knowledge." > > > > > > So you are still stuck in the mud of perplexity with needing a way. > > > > > > And so that ends your contribution to the Collective Mentality > > > > > thread. > > > > > > So a quick rehash here>> > > > > > > You think we need to do something but you don't know what. > > > > > Your thinking there is a way, you don't know what it is but you are > > > > > sure of all the ways it isn't. > > > > > You know that a focus point is needed in order for a "thing" to begin > > > > > a unity. > > > > > You are seeking a way and want to find the key that unlocks the > > answer > > > > > to "how?" > > > > > > Okay, so now the question about what I don't understand! > > > > > > How should we go about facilitating your "idea"? > > > > > > Slip, R.I.P. > > > > > > On Jul 10, 11:04 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Slip, you started the 'Collective Consciousness' thread after our > > > > > > private conversation where I said; > > > > > > "I got this thing in my head saying there's a way to 'hook up' > > > > > > everybody to the collective intelligence. I need help to bring it > > out > > > > > > and make sense out of it. > > > > > > That is what brought me to Mind's Eye." > > > > > > > You went off on the tangent from the idea I presented to you. You > > went > > > > > > straight into the 'pattern' that has to be broken for us to change > > the > > > > > > ways of Society. > > > > > > > I > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
