This is no secret, Orn, as you well know.  When I began participating
in Minds Eye in 2007, I asked members directly for permission to
include these posts in the same discussion on this blog.  After some
time of that, the admin told me that I no longer needed to to this as
it is a public forum and permission not necessary.  FYI - posts from
several forums on the internet are included on this blog.  I do not
make money on it and have not received complaints until now.  It does
no harm, is not a secret, and I am told, is interesting and sometimes
helpful.

But we have been through this before and I am not sure why you keep
bringing it up, especially when it disrupts a thread and has no
relation to it.  As I said, if you (or anyone) care enough to email
me, I will be glad to discuss it with you further.  For now, I break
no rules and am indeed following instruction from 2007.

On Jul 22, 8:05 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chris, in most instances of Molly starting a topic and ending with
> "What do you think?" here at Mind's Eye, it is directly associated
> with and copied from her personal webpage/blog:
>
> http://cblegacy.blogspot.com/
>
> You can check the history here. This has been the case for years.
> Those of us who reply at Minds Eye have our responses echoed on her
> website with, as far as I can tell, no attribution to Mind's Eye at
> all. I have mentioned this in the past and so far am merely stating a
> personal opinion that I see it as deception. Others may not agree.
>
> On Jul 22, 12:48 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Your words aren't clear to me, Orn, in response to Molly's post. Will you
> > clarify them for me?
>
> > I see her post covering a topic, discussing several authors who have written
> > about the topic, and linking to a Wikipedia (public web page) about one of
> > the authors. From what I can tell, your response seems to have zero
> > relevance to her post.
>
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, ornamentalmind 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > Molly, I have mentioned this before. My words are clear. You accept
> > > them or you don't.
>
> > > On Jul 22, 10:28 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > please explain.
>
> > > > On Jul 22, 1:09 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I think that posting to a Google group (Mind's Eye) and then linking
> > > > > the discussion to a personal website, giving the impression it is the
> > > > > locus of attention, is a deceptive practice.
>
> > > > > On Jul 22, 7:29 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Are we in control of ourselves, our lives, our families, our worlds?
> > > > > > Or are we just aware and knowing what one can do if something
> > > > > > unpredictable happens?
> > > > > > There are many explanations for why we do what we do.  For example,
> > > > > > Thomas Metzinger's new Book, The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind
> > > > > > and the Myth of the Self, seriously questions whether there is even
> > > an
> > > > > > "I", let alone a "we." And Douglas Hofstadter's book, I Am a Strange
> > > > > > Loop, contends that the "self" is a recursively self-referencing
> > > > > > memory loop.
>
> > > > > > Hundreds of experiments by Benjamin Libet and others tend to
> > > > > > conclusively confirm that our brain prepares to execute our 
> > > > > > decisions
> > > > > > before we are even aware that anything is being decided. It alerts 
> > > > > > us
> > > > > > to our decisions only in time (a split second) for us to veto them.
>
> > > > > > Seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Libet, as well as Benjamin
> > > > > > Libet's book, Mind Time, and Walter J. Freeman's book, How Brains
> > > Make
> > > > > > Up Their Minds.
>
> > > > > > It is quite likely that we have no so-called "free will" other than
> > > > > > veto power over our specific actions. Our free will may consist
> > > > > > instead of 1) being mindful about any ill-serving subliminal
> > > > > > intentions and tendencies that inform our actions so that we are
> > > > > > accordingly prepared to veto any action that they correspondingly
> > > > > > inform, and of 2) programming (or reprogramming) our subliminal
> > > > > > intentions to be more productive of the experiencing that we most
> > > > > > desire.
>
> > > > > > Do we have the power to create our realities?  Are we in control?
> > > > > > What do YOU think?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to