Something along the lines of "love is an effect of what kind of work you invested in the first place, that's why it's no use to teach it as such from the beginning on".
But we don't believe him, Lee, do we? :-) On 31 Jul., 16:12, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure what you mean by that old chap? > > On 31 July, 14:09, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/7/31 [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > I think then Ian we probably use the same word to describe diffeant > > > things. > > > > For me spirit is all that is not matter, yet exists. > > > Isn't that just "effect" though? Why sex it up as anything more? > > > Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
