I think then Ian we probably use the same word to describe diffeant things.
For me spirit is all that is not matter, yet exists. On 31 July, 12:55, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/31 deripsni <[email protected]> > > > > > Why some do not ever recognize the spirit within is something that I > > cannot answer. > > I recognise the spirit as concept, but probably not in the same sense a > theist would. The "spirit", to me, is a lazy, but useful, collective term to > describe a whole gamut of chemical, psychological, and anthropological > variables operating upon an individual. Pleading irreducible complexity and > elevating the spirit to something mawkishly chimerical -- or even more > unsatisfactory, "divine" -- is a massive leap of faith. > > Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
