Perhaps, but as I have noted we do seem to use these two word interchangeably, and declare as knowldge what should really be called opinion.
Take politics as an example. What would you say is the best form of goverment, do you support Conservitism or Socialism? I think that knowledge can and does change, or perhaps our understanding of the knowledge we have deepens. On 31 July, 13:19, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess it is in the definition of the word. If one believes in > something can that belief change? I think the answer to that is yes. > If one knows something, will that knowledge ever change? I think the > answer to that is no. To me, when one says that they believe > something, it means that they hope, feel, suppose or have faith that > their belief exists. No such feelings are needed with knowledge. Maybe > its just semantics here. > > On Jul 31, 7:39 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm sorry but I have to disgree with the first part of this. > > > Knowledge renders belife obsolete, naaa it dont' We work with both > > all of the time. For example, this very statement. 'Knowledge renders > > belife obsolete'. How do you 'know' that? It is clear that you must > > belive it, why else say it? How have you gained 'knowledge' that it > > is true? > > > I think you have not, I think this is just another belife you hold > > to. Hah or so I belive. > > > On 31 July, 12:32, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Right, knowledge renders belief obsolete. People of faith do not rely > > > on knowledge, which certainly does make religion perplexing. A large > > > percentage of the world bought into it as well, which is even more > > > astounding. I guess religion offers hope, but the validity of the > > > teachings leaves me saddened by the naive nature of humans. > > > > I believe that spirit is an inherent ingredient in all humans, but > > > many hide from the recognition of such. I paid much attention to the > > > unknown activity that often nagged at my cranium, and this led to some > > > remarkable experiences that I a cannot do justice to with words. These > > > experiences have provided me with the knowledge of "God", although I > > > do not use that word to describe "it". I believe that all recognition > > > of "God" must be achieved through the acceptance of the spirit within, > > > and the desire to know more about it. Similar to climbing a mountain, > > > one will never get to the top without the desire and effort to do so. > > > Why some do not ever recognize the spirit within is something that I > > > cannot answer. > > > > On Jul 30, 10:55 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm digging on this...you have to know it to not believe it, so where > > > > does > > > > the knowledge come from? *idea sort of forming* > > > > Am I on the right track? > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:46 PM, ornamentalmind > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > Due to the heat where I live (106 yesterday), I almost don’t have the > > > > > energy to engage in theology discussions today…and… > > > > > (Here it comes again for the old timers here! ;-) ) > > > > > > I am a sort of a Gnostic/atheist….if one must assign terms. When it > > > > > comes to belief(s), the very notion of belief leaves me perplexed. I > > > > > can say that things I know about I can decide to give attention to. > > > > > Also, other things I know about I can not give attention to. In both > > > > > cases, one must have some knowledge/wisdom about the notion in > > > > > question. > > > > > > I project on others that they too must have some sort of notion of > > > > > what god must be/be like…what attributes are involved. This I find to > > > > > be the case whether they are theistic or atheistic. So, again in both > > > > > cases, the person knows about the thing being addressed, god in this > > > > > context. Some decide, based on some previous experience(s), to reject > > > > > the notion and others decide to embrace it. For me, the main question > > > > > here is what has led to the ‘now’ that produces a choice? An adjunct > > > > > question involves the above named attributes…but that is not the > > > > > foundation of this question. It does need to be addressed for people > > > > > to be clear in interaction about the divine though. > > > > > > I’ll stop here and see if anyone wishes to continue… > > > > > > On Jul 30, 12:11 pm, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > HaHa Yes, it's a good replacement for normalcy as well. However, > > > > > > what > > > > > > some people consider weird, others consider normal, so it's really > > > > > > relegated to ones perception. And I agree about the problem of > > > > > > understanding religion through "normal" eyes. > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 2:17 pm, Lonlaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I find weirdness relieving. I think it's because it gives me a > > > > > > > break > > > > > > > from tirelessly (without tires) trying to make sense of > > > > > > > everything. > > > > > > > This is especially helpful when it comes to religion.- Hide > > > > > > > quoted text > > > > > - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
