Just read this article.  Some very good ideas about Health Care
Reform.  This actually would be change I could believe in.  Starts off
with a quote from my favorite living British PM.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html#mod=djemWMP

dj


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Don Johnson<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Orn, thanks for engaging.  I have some responses.  ;-)
>
> It is so strange that we see the world in such a different way Don!
> Perhaps I didn’t mean not-for-profit when it comes to doctors. England
> has a system where the MDs do quite well with socialized medicine…so
> does Canada…and, if my memory is correct, France is good too. Many
> other countries have such a system and the vast majority of the
> doctors are fine with it. Perhaps you only know a few spoiled
> brats? ;-)
>
> It's not strange at all.  We get our info from different sources and
> have lead entirely different lives.  We disagree on almost everything
> and this doesn't surprise me.  It's gruff that gives me pause with his
> dead on insight on some matters and incorrect opinions(i.e., not like
> mine) on others.
>
> Maybe docs are well taken care of in England, I don't know.  I know
> they have private practices that cater to the wealthy that get much
> better care then those on the public system.  When I see some World
> Organization(i.e., socialist) rating the health care of countries I
> always take it with a grain of salt.  I believe and so do most of the
> people I know(including doctors) that we have the best quality care in
> the world right here in the USA.  That said, in discussions with
> doctors only one has complained about Health Care Reform.  He's my
> parent's pain management Dr. and doesn't seem like much of a brat but
> I could be wrong.  His specialty along with his client base is likely
> to disappear under a single-payer system.  They'll be referred to
> end-of-life management.  What bureaucrat would sanction easing the
> pain of someone that is a drag on the system rather then an asset?
> Most Dr.s will probably see their client base increased with the
> number of new patients freshly insured so I perfectly understand why
> they'll like the new system.  I'm not sure how well the hospitals and
> future patients will do, however.  Check this out.
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574344342571670158.html
>
>  I'm not keen on full deregulation.  Too many crackpot would-be
> doctors out there.  I think the medical profession does a fair job of
> policing themselves and I think we should retain laws that require
> certain practices to be carried out by real doctors.
>
> Don, what have you seen? As far as I know there is no final proposal
> ready for the president to sign yet, is there? As to the tax payers,
> yes, perhaps the top 2 % will have to go back to paying their fair
> share, but when all is taken into account, the costs will be less to
> the rest of us. Hmmm, sounds like Texas has returned to the
> confederacy, no? ;-) Financial slavery is just that…slavery as far as
> I can tell. Regular payments my A$$!!!
>
> I keep hearing this defense.  "Their is no bill for the President to
> support!"  "Ha, checkmate!  All your arguments are straw man because
> the President has no opinion!"  Well I say that's a bunch of malarkey.
>  His support of a single-payer system is well documented.  Add that to
> what appears to be a free-reign policy with regards to the House and
> outtacontrol Pelosi and a reasonable person would assume he supports
> what his fellow super-libs support.  The costs will not be less for me
> or for most of the tax payers I know with employer sponsored health
> care.  I suspect they will discontinue service soon after government
> run health care becomes available.  It is unlikely I'll see a raise to
> compensate.
>
> I'm old school.  I think when you borrow money you should pay it back
> with interest and when someone offers you help you reciprocate asap
> with more generosity then they initially showed you.  People that have
> the ability to pay money back and choose not to are deadbeats.  Yes,
> I've known people like this.  I am very surprised that in your long
> life you haven't.  You have been blessed with the people you've met.
> I'm jealous.
>
> dj
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:42 AM,
> ornamentalmind<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> “Here's the problem.  Ok, one of the problems with not-for-profit
>> medicine.  Doctors that excel usually expect some form of reward for
>> their excellence.  A warm fuzzy feeling that you are helping people
>> isn't enough for most people.  They want money and lots of it.” – DJ
>>
>> It is so strange that we see the world in such a different way Don!
>> Perhaps I didn’t mean not-for-profit when it comes to doctors. England
>> has a system where the MDs do quite well with socialized medicine…so
>> does Canada…and, if my memory is correct, France is good too. Many
>> other countries have such a system and the vast majority of the
>> doctors are fine with it. Perhaps you only know a few spoiled
>> brats? ;-)
>>
>> “If you look at the quality of the work or product of something that
>> is free and compare it to that of work or product that is done/made
>> for the purpose of profit you will see what I mean.  Compare a free
>> clinic with a for-profit clinic.  Compare a British hospital with one
>> of our private hospitals right here in Houston.  It's not like that
>> 100% of the time but on average I'd rather pay for my health care.
>> You get what you pay for.  An exception might be the Shriner's kid's
>> hospital here in Houston.(and probably other cities)  Surgeons donate
>> their time and services here frequently to get that warm, fuzzy
>> feeling.  It supplements the even warmer, fuzzier feeling they get
>> cashing their checks from their private practice. “ =- DJ
>>
>>
>> You seem to be conflating numerous entirely different systems Don. No
>> one is proposing a system that will not pay health professionals.(If
>> they want, they can still do pro bono work too!) And, as I’m sure you
>> know, the majority of MDs and Nurses are for Single Payer as the best
>> system. They just want to take care of people, not the insurance
>> companies and filling out forms. They do not want to have to ask if a
>> person has insurance before they treat them. Such a system will pay
>> the doctors and nurses what they need. It just won’t be so good for
>> the current stock holders of health insurance companies and their
>> CES’s. While I care about them perhaps they can find an honorable job.
>> (excuse the hyperbole there!)
>>
>> “As for lowering the cost I have six words.  Tort reform, tort reform
>> and tort reform.  With a congress packed full of lawyers this ain't
>> likely.  I'd put this group of lobbyists right behind Teacher's
>> Unions
>> in how well they are taken care of by our elected officials.  So since
>> tort reform is but a dream I have what congress could do is open up
>> the health insurance business to competition.  Not with government
>> subsidized Medicare or Medicaid but with each other.  Allow folks to
>> get insurance from other states.  Deregulate it somewhat to allow
>> people to chose the amount of coverage they want.” – DJ
>>
>> So Don, what about full deregulation? Sounds good. And, throw in what
>> the Congress uses as well as the military and medicare….most western
>> countries have a well working system of health care that includes
>> state sponsored care. The result is that no longer do people die
>> because they don’t have insurance or even if they do! Tort reform?
>> Perhaps. But this is far away from the real issue now. Some would
>> suggest you are dragging a pink mackerel across the road! :-D Just say
>> ‘Yes’ Don, to health care that everyone can afford. Let people decide
>> whether they wish to line the pockets of stockholders and CEOs or just
>> get taken care of if they get sick. Seems fair, no? Full deregulation
>> would be a great thing.
>>
>> “I agree costs are high.  I have no problem in Congress addressing
>> this issue but what I've seen so far will cause more problems then it
>> solves and will probably cost more for the tax payers.  As an aside,
>> here in Texas if you owe medical bills you can take your time paying
>> them off without penalty of extra charges or added interest.  So if
>> you get nailed with a 60,000 dollar surgery and rehab bill you can
>> spread that out and just pay 100 bucks a month until it's paid off or
>> you die.  The key is regular payments.  Isn't that right Slip? “ – DJ
>>
>> Don, what have you seen? As far as I know there is no final proposal
>> ready for the president to sign yet, is there? As to the tax payers,
>> yes, perhaps the top 2 % will have to go back to paying their fair
>> share, but when all is taken into account, the costs will be less to
>> the rest of us. Hmmm, sounds like Texas has returned to the
>> confederacy, no? ;-) Financial slavery is just that…slavery as far as
>> I can tell. Regular payments my A$$!!!
>>
>> “Unfortunately, one of the reasons costs are so high is the incredible
>> amount of deadbeats running around.  It's disgusting.  I'd investigate
>> maybe having a couple of big, burly orderlies to check folks for
>> insurance, credit cards or briefcases full of cash and bounce anyone
>> that doesn't have these things back out in the street on their ear.
>> That ought to bring costs down. “ – DJ
>>
>> Deadbeats? Are you kidding? Do you personally know these people? I
>> don’t. In fact, decades ago, the indigent (deadbeats in your parlance
>> perhaps) were written off by public hospitals…even private ones! Today
>> the bottom line has pushed its way too far ahead of any line of
>> health. Your fantasy, as entertaining as it may be, only obfuscates.
>> The USA is down to something like 38th in the world when it comes to
>> health care but it is number one in costs. Without having to look any
>> further, it is clear that a big change must happen and soon. Doctors,
>> Nurses, even congressmen are afraid of a revolution if this doesn’t
>> happen as I hear it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 12, 3:13 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Here's the problem.  Ok, one of the problems with not-for-profit
>>> medicine.  Doctors that excel usually expect some form of reward for
>>> their excellence.  A warm fuzzy feeling that you are helping people
>>> isn't enough for most people.  They want money and lots of it.  If you
>>> look at the quality of the work or product of something that is free
>>> and compare it to that of work or product that is done/made for the
>>> purpose of profit you will see what I mean.  Compare a free clinic
>>> with a for-profit clinic.  Compare a British hospital with one of our
>>> private hospitals right here in Houston.  It's not like that 100% of
>>> the time but on average I'd rather pay for my health care.  You get
>>> what you pay for.  An exception might be the Shriner's kid's hospital
>>> here in Houston.(and probably other cities)  Surgeons donate their
>>> time and services here frequently to get that warm, fuzzy feeling.  It
>>> supplements the even warmer, fuzzier feeling they get cashing their
>>> checks from their private practice.
>>>
>>> As for lowering the cost I have six words.  Tort reform, tort reform
>>> and tort reform.  With a congress packed full of lawyers this ain't
>>> likely.  I'd put this group of lobbyists right behind Teacher's Unions
>>> in how well they are taken care of by our elected officials.  So since
>>> tort reform is but a dream I have what congress could do is open up
>>> the health insurance business to competition.  Not with government
>>> subsidized Medicare or Medicaid but with each other.  Allow folks to
>>> get insurance from other states.  Deregulate it somewhat to allow
>>> people to chose the amount of coverage they want.
>>>
>>> I agree costs are high.  I have no problem in Congress addressing this
>>> issue but what I've seen so far will cause more problems then it
>>> solves and will probably cost more for the tax payers.  As an aside,
>>> here in Texas if you owe medical bills you can take your time paying
>>> them off without penalty of extra charges or added interest.  So if
>>> you get nailed with a 60,000 dollar surgery and rehab bill you can
>>> spread that out and just pay 100 bucks a month until it's paid off or
>>> you die.  The key is regular payments.  Isn't that right Slip?
>>> Unfortunately, one of the reasons costs are so high is the incredible
>>> amount of deadbeats running around.  It's disgusting.  I'd investigate
>>> maybe having a couple of big, burly orderlies to check folks for
>>> insurance, credit cards or briefcases full of cash and bounce anyone
>>> that doesn't have these things back out in the street on their ear.
>>> That ought to bring costs down.
>>>
>>> dj
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM, BB47<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yes, I think health care is one of those things that should not be for
>>> > profit, even though I am a believer in Capitalism.  And I am not a
>>> > believer in price controls but that too seems to be the only viable
>>> > way to control the costs
>>>
>>> > On Aug 12, 1:53 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> "...I don't want to get into the debate out the "blame" of the health
>>> >> care system but without insurance anything major can wipe you out over
>>> >> here. ..." - BB47
>>>
>>> >> Truth be told...even IF one has health insurance, the odds are that
>>> >> anything even remotely near being 'major' can and will wipe you out
>>> >> anyway.
>>> >> The term 'insurance' appears to only apply to the corporations these
>>> >> days...they are assured to make a killing!
>>> >> On Aug 12, 9:56 am, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > Well  our health care system over here as you know is messed up beyond
>>> >> > belief.  That would have cost me $3000.  I don't want to get into the
>>> >> > debate out the "blame" of the health care system but without insurance
>>> >> > anything major can wipe you out over here.  When a major operation
>>> >> > costs half a million dollars?  You better have insurance.  A friend at
>>> >> > work broke her leg.  Sixty grand. I am not going to argue anymore on
>>> >> > it (you might be relieved!)  Talking politics and religion is said to
>>> >> > be the worst possible topics to discuss.  I dropped one.  One less
>>> >> > step in a bad direction is an improvement isn't it?
>>>
>>> >> > On Aug 12, 9:16 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > If it is not food she is not interested,, she is good that way.
>>> >> > > Allan
>>>
>>> >> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:06 PM, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > > On Aug 12, 1:53 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > Well for me I would be the loser so far over the last seven 
>>> >> > > > > years  has
>>> >> > > > cost
>>> >> > > > > me less than 80 euros per year
>>> >> > > > > Allan
>>>
>>> >> > > > Just don't let your dog eat a nasty kitchen sponge that fell off 
>>> >> > > > the
>>> >> > > > counter, or the time she chewed the metal parts off my jacket to 
>>> >> > > > get
>>> >> > > > to the treats I left in there.
>>>
>>> >> > > --
>>> >> > > (
>>> >> > >  )
>>> >> > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to