except to the awakened imagination, which manifests the possible into
the real...

On Aug 28, 8:38 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 Aug, 13:23, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Heh is it wicked then of me to ask Molly, what if your awareness
> > changes to reveal that Pat's ideas are wrong?
>
>    That, my friend, whilst in the realms of possibility (as proven by
> your imagining them) are not a part of the realm of reality.  That
> which is both imaginable and real is greater than that which is only
> imaginable.
>
> > On 28 Aug, 13:16, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > "What is that, Pat, all those other events that were equal
>
> > > > or even better alternates that did not happen ?  Where are they ?  Why
> > > > are they ? What happens to them ?  Are they nothing, meaningless, to
> > > > be purged away from within us ?"
>
> > > As I understand it, Vam, they remain in the realm of possibility and,
> > > as your viewpoint brings them into your experience, a change in
> > > viewpoint or awareness will manifest the possibility into your
> > > experience.  If your view includes what some would call cosmic
> > > consciousness, or the entire realm of possibility, you will bring this
> > > into your experience - the possibility of the god within you - the
> > > one.  What you do - is change your view, or awareness.
>
> > > On Aug 28, 7:20 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 28 Aug, 11:06, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Good, Pat !  Indeed, Kingdom of God. I understand your saying : It is
> > > > > One. It is God. It is Kingdom. It is I. That makes four -  One, God,
> > > > > Kingdom, and I.  Now what ?  You'd say, it is One. Then, why were /
> > > > > are the other three there ? What good are they, the purpose ?  Are
> > > > > they or are they not ?
>
> > > > You are counting Maya.  And you could go on endlessly and affect very
> > > > little.
>
> > > > > On the other hand, whether it is four, three or one, it is I in
> > > > > command now, facing the music, standing, retreating or advancing,
> > > > > feeling, choking on my breath, dealing with my blood pressure,
> > > > > thinking, confused, in doubt, knowing, analysing, having to see, deal
> > > > > with, decide, not confident, weak, happy, sad, noise, pollution,
> > > > > poverty, greed, good ...  
>
> > > > Out of your own mouth: "having to see...".  Where is your choice,
> > > > there?  For a moment, your hand betrayed your view of you.  What
> > > > choice did you have when you were thrust into this life?  When did you
> > > > 'acquire' your perceived ability to choose?  It is not you, but the
> > > > One that DOES all these things.
>
> > > > >It is I, with the choice and the power to
> > > > > do or not to do, now.  There is no automatic connection with all of
> > > > > that idea of yours -  four, three or one. None of that helps me with
> > > > > this task I have before me. Nothing you say or have advised us to
> > > > > obtain, in terms of idea or understanding, enters the picture unless I
> > > > > reflect upon it four, nine or seventeen times. Which luxury I do not
> > > > > have. It's to be done now. I even know I need to " do unto others, as
> > > > > I do unto myself."  But, everything is unclear, much even opposed to
> > > > > me doing that. It just does not happen. It needs to be done,
> > > > > everytime. Just doesn't happen, four, three or one notwithstanding !
>
> > > >    Then make it so.  If you know the One, you would know I'm telling
> > > > you the truth.  If it takes reflection, so be it.  You have all the
> > > > time you need and you can do nothing to gather any more to yourself.
>
> > > > > The crucial role of I, even to me, is stark, direct and obvious. I'd
> > > > > be much helped if I can reach within me, this I am forever intimate
> > > > > and immediately one with, and find something to clarify this world
> > > > > within I am faced with, lends me the courage to step up on to doing
> > > > > what I need to, and strengthen me for the vicious consequences I might
> > > > > face for my conduct. I'd like me to help myself, empower myself, and
> > > > > others if I could. The One, God, Kingdom could help. But, if they too
> > > > > mean what they've laid down and value what I need to ( unto
> > > > > others ... ), they'd converge on me, in my decision and my action,
> > > > > anyway. They'd be false if they did not, isn't it ?  It is I who must
> > > > > act and live with the consequences, and it is ' I ' I must summon
> > > > > forth the strength and conviction from.
>
> > > >    And you must, ultimately, know that it is THAT and not you.  That
> > > > Thou Art.  I tell you nothing new, I only reinforce it.  We each find
> > > > the will within, of course, because there is no other.  Whilst you may
> > > > not like the taste of this medicine, perhaps you, were not in need of
> > > > it.  There are many ways to the One, but they all start and end with
> > > > the realisation that it is not 'us' but the One.  That We Are.  Each
> > > > of us.  Everyone.
>
> > > > > The other, practical and philosophical, aspect of your idea is that it
> > > > > has no place for all the events that do not manifest, happen, are
> > > > > excluded in favour of the one event that does at any space - time
> > > > > coordinate. What is that, Pat, all those other events that were equal
> > > > > or even better alternates that did not happen ?  Where are they ?  Why
> > > > > are they ? What happens to them ?  Are they nothing, meaningless, to
> > > > > be purged away from within us ?
>
> > > >    They belong to the set of things that did not happen, or the set of
> > > > things that are not happening or the set of things that will not
> > > > happen.  They exist in the Mind of God, to which you have access
> > > > through your consciousness, but they are not a part of space-time.
> > > > Their existence is eternal in the Calabi-Yau.  I have said this
> > > > before, too, and was not comprehended.
>
> > > > > I am not looking for a ' pat ' response, Pat. But I do want you to
> > > > > appreciate these issues. Reality must spring from what is real to us.
>
> > > >    Rather, you should accept reality as it is.  Reality springs from
> > > > the One, not from anything else, as there is nothing else.  You make
> > > > the same mistake in thinking that St. Anselm did by making the
> > > > perceiver different than that which is perceived.  This makes a
> > > > division between you and the One.  Know that all we say comes from the
> > > > One, and with these words, I have NOT made the One a liar.
>
> > > > > On Aug 28, 1:16 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 27 Aug, 18:37, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > " Try as you might, you will only ever perform one event at any 
> > > > > > > given
> > > > > > > place/time."
>
> > > > > > > You mean, Pat, that we cannot move both our hands at the same 
> > > > > > > time,
> > > > > > > causing two events at the same time ?
>
> > > > > >     That's correct.  Threy are separated by space-time not just by
> > > > > > space.  They are very close to one another, but they do not occupy 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > same space-time or you would perceive them as one.  Time is joined 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > space and if you perceive a spatial difference, then you must admit 
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > temporal one as well.
>
> > > > > > > From what I've seen in yoga, sports, talent and reality show
> > > > > > > programmes on television, I visualise people with the ability to 
> > > > > > > move
> > > > > > > their two legs, mouth, -----, or sundry other appendages at the 
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > time !  All this, multiple events at the same time, while being 
> > > > > > > at the
> > > > > > > same extended point in space.
>
> > > > > >    You allow the machinery of your body and its rate of perception
> > > > > > with the reality of the matter.  All things seemingly separated by
> > > > > > space are, in fact, separated by space-time.  We've known this to be
> > > > > > true for almost 100 years.
>
> > > > > > > More importantly, apart from rooting the old commandments in
> > > > > > > scientific perspective, what can the man in the street reach for 
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the stringy energy theory, in terms of values for action or 
> > > > > > > thought
> > > > > > > and decision - making he's called upon to deliver on in his day 
> > > > > > > to day
> > > > > > > life ...  choice, will, discrimination, effort, behaviour,
> > > > > > > relationship, profession, creativity, etc.
>
> > > > > >    Simply put, my friend, he can reach for the Kingdom of God.  When
> > > > > > you accept that it is God that DOES, you will understand that God
> > > > > > rules.  And when God rules in your heart, the Kingdom (the 
> > > > > > rulership)
> > > > > > of God is established within you.
>
> > > > > > > In other words, what does the theory have for the common man in 
> > > > > > > terms
> > > > > > > of strength, clarity and direction, if one cannot appreciate the
> > > > > > > rarified mathematics involved in it ?
>
> > > > > > It leads him to the Kingdom of God and it makes him understand that
> > > > > > 'that which you do to others, you have done to yourself', as there 
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > only One.
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 27, 9:21 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On 27 Aug, 17:10, "[email protected]" 
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Pat my fine fellow, that is just the thing, you keep on 
> > > > > > > > > saying, and do
> > > > > > > > > no showing.
>
> > > > > > > > > Let me say this.  I have two hands one is black the other is 
> > > > > > > > > white.
> > > > > > > > > You do not belive me?  Let me tell you this then.  I have two 
> > > > > > > > > hands
> > > > > > > > > one is white but the other is black.
>
> > > > > > > > > What you still do not belive me?  Then let me explain this to 
> > > > > > > > > you.  Of
> > > > > > > > > the two hands that I have, one is black, but the other, it is 
> > > > > > > > > white!
>
> > > > > > > > > Ahhh so you would like me to show you both of my hands so 
> > > > > > > > > that you can
> > > > > > > > > see the validity of my claims for yourself?  Yes I will do
> > > > > > > > > that.....tomorrow!
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to