Hi Pat, I have some questions: 1. Do you agree that having theoretical mathematical proof of something which you are unable to observe and test should demand a profound level caution before you attempt to draw conclusions from it?
2. Do you agree that if this theoretical mathematical proof was based on other theoretical mathematical proof(s), then the level of caution should be, by measure, increased? 3. Given the above, is deciding that all this is sufficient proof to claim certainty of God, monism, determinism, and a mode of moral behaviour, a little absurd? (I'll still buy your book though.) :) Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
