Umm Kant huh! I can't even hear the name without thinking Brian!
On 3 Sep, 14:33, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fran, you're right, of course !
>
> But that, this limiting of effects of human thought within discreet
> limits, is also erroneous. Maybe, we are not as yet ready to recognise
> it and accept its implications because, for instance, it would upset
> our judgement and our judicial norms.
>
> It is nevertheless undeniable that thought, of the kind of Kant's,
> arise from the same continuity ground from which, say, Nazism took
> demagogic advantage of.
>
> Before you chase me out of the ground, let me confess that Spinoza and
> Kant were two philosophers who ruled the longest on my developing mind
> among all western philosophers.
>
> On Sep 3, 5:52 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 3 Sep., 11:07, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:> Or duty may have had
> > some influence in the rise of Nazi Germany/
> > > Fascism.
>
> > Seeing Kant as an ideological antecedent for the Nazis is like placing
> > the responsiblity for Charles Manson on the Beatles.
>
> > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
