http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjz16xjeBAA

On Sep 3, 9:43 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Umm Kant huh!    I can't even hear the name without thinking Brian!
>
> On 3 Sep, 14:33, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Fran, you're right, of course !
>
> > But that, this limiting of effects of human thought within discreet
> > limits, is also erroneous. Maybe, we are not as yet ready to recognise
> > it and accept its implications because, for instance, it would upset
> > our judgement and our judicial norms.
>
> > It is nevertheless undeniable that thought, of the kind of Kant's,
> > arise from the same continuity ground from which, say, Nazism took
> > demagogic advantage of.
>
> > Before you chase me out of the ground, let me confess that Spinoza and
> > Kant were two philosophers who ruled the longest on my developing mind
> > among all western philosophers.
>
> > On Sep 3, 5:52 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 3 Sep., 11:07, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:> Or duty may have 
> > > had some influence in the rise of Nazi Germany/
> > > > Fascism.
>
> > > Seeing Kant as an ideological antecedent for the Nazis is like placing
> > > the responsiblity for Charles Manson on the Beatles.
>
> > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to