I'm more inclined to think of this one :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQycQ8DABvc
Francis On 3 Sep., 15:45, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjz16xjeBAA > > On Sep 3, 9:43 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Umm Kant huh! I can't even hear the name without thinking Brian! > > > On 3 Sep, 14:33, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Fran, you're right, of course ! > > > > But that, this limiting of effects of human thought within discreet > > > limits, is also erroneous. Maybe, we are not as yet ready to recognise > > > it and accept its implications because, for instance, it would upset > > > our judgement and our judicial norms. > > > > It is nevertheless undeniable that thought, of the kind of Kant's, > > > arise from the same continuity ground from which, say, Nazism took > > > demagogic advantage of. > > > > Before you chase me out of the ground, let me confess that Spinoza and > > > Kant were two philosophers who ruled the longest on my developing mind > > > among all western philosophers. > > > > On Sep 3, 5:52 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 3 Sep., 11:07, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:> Or duty may have > > > > had some influence in the rise of Nazi Germany/ > > > > > Fascism. > > > > > Seeing Kant as an ideological antecedent for the Nazis is like placing > > > > the responsiblity for Charles Manson on the Beatles. > > > > > Francis- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
