2009/9/7 ornamentalmind <[email protected]>: > > So, the criteria you use is ‘sensibility’…along with simplicity, > correct? And, you arrived at this juncture how?...other than using the > very thing (thinking) that you are arguing about, no?
No. And by the way you do have a knack for altering what I have said. I have not said what you have written, above. Revelation from God is self-validating and should not be used in an argument to support the existence, will or purpose of God. Very simple. The reason has nothing to do with this solipsistic nonsense that you are trying to twist it into. Any self-validating experience is invalid as an argument to support the idea that is self-validated. If you want to carry on vis a vis solipsistic ideas, feel free, I have been there, done that and don't find it interesting enough to do again. If you think (and I get the impression that you do) that self-validating experiences are to be fairly used in discussions I have no interest in changing your mind, I simply will continue to discount them in my own discussions. Fair enough? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
