2009/9/7 ornamentalmind <[email protected]>: > “…Revelatory experiences are real to the one > experiencing them but are too tautological to be used as an argument > with anyone other than yourself.” – SE > > IF one in fact embraces the logic found there Simon, it can equally be > applied to a brain thinking that if it thinks in a rational way it can > understand itself, others, the world and cosmology. Do you find that > your thinking can be negated due to tautology?
In some areas that concern personal experiences, of course. That is why I don't use them to support my arguments. An experience of God that is self-validating, however, is almost always used as an argument. It shouldn't be. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
