Sorry Lon - 'conditions for existence' is Kantian jive - generally stuff emerges in relation to other stuff. I used to get great pleasure from music, mostly classical, but have lost this since I was badly hurt years ago - I assume the music hasn't changed, but my emotional reactions to it have. If there was more honesty we might all be more hospitable and so on.
On 28 Sep, 20:39, Lonlaz <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, our feelings based reactions aren't really conductive to > anything besides the concerns more immediate and visceral. But > sometimes I wonder if our overactive brains haven't managed to make > things too complicated. > > I'm not sure I read a 'conditions for existence' discussion, but it > does seem that the difference between us and 'animals' are in shades > of grey. > > On Sep 28, 2:00 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It seems to me we can play physical games and mental games involving > > negative feedback in terms of resistance to and amplification of what > > we will feel. Emotion as a source of anything like love, justice, > > decency seems a non-starter. One might, once again, wonder about > > 'conditions for existence' - and some of these conditions are shared > > by animals. > > > On 28 Sep, 19:09, Lonlaz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Does emotion really need to be that metaphysical? > > > > We are physical creatures, and our emotions and feelings are part of > > > our physical interface to the world. A cat's fur stands on end to > > > make the animal look larger upon encountering a dog. A stag's body > > > fills with adrenaline with the thrill of combat. I don't think these > > > emotions are any different than ours. > > > > Our main problem our feelings and the physical reactions that go with > > > are still linked baser, more animal reactions, and they may be > > > obsolete for the situation in our complex world. This is a problem > > > because our feelings and emotions are much closer to our animal mind, > > > which usually gets a drop on our more rational thought processes. > > > > The neat thing about ourselves is that our minds create an internal > > > world to percieve. This leads us to having physical reactions to non > > > physical situations. This is the primary reason for the existance of > > > our minds, to be able to predict or engineer pain and joy. Strangely > > > enough, it is by invoking those feelings on a smaller scale.- Hide quoted > > > text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
