what do you think, Pat, is the difference between emotion and feeling?
On Sep 28, 12:05 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 Sep, 17:13, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What role does emotion play in our everyday lives? How does emotion
> > affect our experience and being? These are questions addressed by
> > some of the finest minds of our era.
>
> > For Piaget, emotion is the motivating force of action emanating from
> > outside the individual in the form of sensations emitted by objects.
> > His view is rooted in the Newtonian conception of a universe comprised
> > in isolated objects requiring an emotive force to initiate a series of
> > mechanistic interactions between objects. Piaget reduces all
> > conscious human experience to a cognitive formulation of these causal
> > relations. His abstract concept of emotion as force fails to
> > explain the relationship between bodily feelings, emotions, and higher
> > forms of consciousness in human beings.
>
> > Alfred North Whitehead indicates the factors in human nature which go
> > to make up the particular emotions, arise from our apprehension of
> > these permanent features of order in the world. His concrete concept
> > of emotion gives insight into the experience of bodily feelings and
> > their relationship to the growth and learning of human beings. He
> > explains the emotions are the crucial mediating factors between the
> > welter of awareness of these feelings in higher organisms. “We
> > perceive other things which are in the world of actualities in the
> > same sense as we are. So our emotions are directed toward other
> > things, including of course, our bodily organs . . . the world for me
> > is nothing else than how the functioning of my body present it for my
> > experience.”
>
> > Jean Paul Sartre sees it differently in his book, The Emotions,
> > Outline of a Theory. He sees our emotion as an “abrupt drop of
> > consciousness into the magical.” He believes: “emotion is not
> > accidental modification of a subject which would otherwise be plunged
> > into an unchanged world. It is easy to see that every emotional
> > apprehension of an object which frightens, irritates, sadness, etc.,
> > can be made only on the basis of a total alteration of the world. In
> > order that an object may in reality appear terrible, it must realize
> > itself as an immediate and magical presence face to face with
> > consciousness.“ In other words, we modify our experience with emotion
> > to make it more comfortable, according to our own nature. We emote
> > sadness, anger or gloom because “lacking the power and will to
> > accomplish the acts which we have been planning, we behave in such a
> > way that the universe no longer requires anything of us.”
>
> > What do YOU think?
>
> As for me, I see emotions as the outward expression of inner
> feelings. They are the way we communicate our inner feelings to those
> around us. So, emotions are a form of communication of data (our
> inner feelings) to those who cannot (and, perhaps, could not) perceive
> them (the feelings) in an obvious way.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
