On 28 Sep, 17:34, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> what do you think, Pat, is the difference between emotion and feeling?
>

I just described that.  Emotions are the outward expression of our
inner feelings.  When our feelings are expressed outwardly, we
'emote'.  Thus, emotions are the outward expression of the inner
feelings.

> On Sep 28, 12:05 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 27 Sep, 17:13, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > What role does emotion play in our everyday lives?  How does emotion
> > > affect our experience and being?  These are questions addressed by
> > > some of the finest minds of our era.
>
> > > For Piaget, emotion is the motivating force of action emanating from
> > > outside the individual in the form of sensations emitted by objects.
> > > His view is rooted in the Newtonian conception of a universe comprised
> > > in isolated objects requiring an emotive force to initiate a series of
> > > mechanistic interactions between objects.  Piaget reduces all
> > > conscious human experience to a cognitive formulation of these causal
> > > relations.    His abstract concept of emotion as force fails to
> > > explain the relationship between bodily feelings, emotions, and higher
> > > forms of consciousness in human beings.
>
> > > Alfred North Whitehead indicates the factors in human nature which go
> > > to make up the particular emotions, arise from our apprehension of
> > > these permanent features of order in the world. His concrete concept
> > > of emotion gives insight into the experience of bodily feelings and
> > > their relationship to the growth and learning of human beings.  He
> > > explains the emotions are the crucial mediating factors between the
> > > welter of awareness of these feelings in higher organisms.  “We
> > > perceive other things which are in the world of actualities in the
> > > same sense as we are.   So our emotions are directed toward other
> > > things, including of course, our bodily organs . . . the world for me
> > > is nothing else than how the functioning of my body present it for my
> > > experience.”
>
> > > Jean Paul Sartre sees it differently in his book, The Emotions,
> > > Outline of a Theory.  He sees our emotion as an “abrupt drop of
> > > consciousness into the magical.”  He believes:  “emotion is not
> > > accidental modification of a subject which would otherwise be plunged
> > > into an unchanged world.  It is easy to see that every emotional
> > > apprehension of an object which frightens, irritates, sadness, etc.,
> > > can be made only on the basis of a total alteration of the world.  In
> > > order that an object may in reality appear terrible, it must realize
> > > itself as an immediate and magical presence face to face with
> > > consciousness.“  In other words, we modify our experience with emotion
> > > to make it more comfortable, according to our own nature.  We emote
> > > sadness, anger or gloom because “lacking the power and will to
> > > accomplish the acts which we have been planning, we behave in such a
> > > way that the universe no longer requires anything of us.”
>
> > > What do YOU think?
>
> > As for me, I see emotions as the outward expression of inner
> > feelings.  They are the way we communicate our inner feelings to those
> > around us.  So, emotions are a form of communication of data (our
> > inner feelings) to those who cannot (and, perhaps, could not) perceive
> > them (the feelings) in an obvious way.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to