The masses are asses!  I would have to agree with Freud.  I don't
really find much outside of my immediate realm that intrigues me.
Thanks for the Freudian view!

On Sep 28, 6:34 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> If it is any comfort to you Slip - to paraphrase Freud: He was lamentably sad 
> that for him
>
> the mass of men of which he came into daily contact were not much more 
> elevated than
>
> swine. (I think if questioned he would not have anything personal against 
> pigs - only human pigs.)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slip Disc <[email protected]>
> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mon, Sep 28, 2009 4:59 pm
> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Just the Top Ten, Imagine the rest
>
> ecause I have a different emotional base should not evoke ridicule
> ut more so understanding that there are many differing
> ersonalities.  I posted a new thread on street violence but
> ruthfully aside from watching the video I felt not much more than
> ismay and then moved on to the next news story.   I don't really have
> uch empathy for humanity other than for those with whom I come in
> ersonal contact with.  I don't think there is anything wrong with
> hat position and it's not really an ability to disconnect its just
> he way it is.  There is no pre-meditation that prompts me to
> isconnect.   It's nothing new and in fact has been covered in past
> hreads, my feeling alien to this world and being present only as a
> oyeur.  I don't have any need to take part.  I have the makings of
> ame and notoriety but really don't care if I die unknown, I'm just
> ot impressed with it at all.  Life is a fleeting moment in time and
> o I spend the most of it in happiness and share that with those
> round me.
>   We've been through this before Lee, there is nothing I can
> o about the lives of those people, so why should I spend time being
> oncerned?  For me it's just a news story to read.  When there is a
> isaster I donate money to the relief fund, I give to several
> harities, disabled organizations and extend my assistance in certain
> ituations where I can be of help.  A tropical storm just killed 140
> eople in the Philippines, what do you want me to do?  That's life
> ubba! Crying over it isn't going to change anything.
>
> On Sep 28, 8:59 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> rote:
>  I think it's more than chilly mate, I think it is frightening.
>
>  Do you really have the ability to disconnect your empathy for the
>  plight of your fellow human?
>
>  On 28 Sep, 14:46, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > I've seen it a few times and never found it heart wrenching.  I
>  > usually spend more time wondering how stupid people are to get that
>  > hooked up with a preacher, thinking what is wrong with people.  I
>  > viewed it all in a non-chalant way, completed unaffected and that may
>  > seem chilly but it's just my separation from the external at work.  I
>  > don't waste much time with morons unless it's for entertainment
>  > purposes.  People that do stupid things ultimately pay for their
>  > stupidity and I couldn't care less about them.
>
>  > On Sep 28, 8:31 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > > Yeah, I saw it. Heart wrenching
> .
>
>  > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:08 AM, [email protected] <
>
>  > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > > > Did anybody watch that documentry about Rev Jim and Jamestown the
>  > > > other month?  With audio recordings of the actual event at the end,
>  > > > fuck me talk about harrowing.
>
>  > > > On 26 Sep, 10:04, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > > > We
>  > > > > all have drunk some flavor of Kool-Aid...and some of us know it. -orn
>
>  > > > > Yeah, maybe so.  But at least mine's not flavored with cyanide!
>
>  > > > > dj
>
>  > > > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:34 AM, ornamentalmind
>
>  > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > > > > > “…I think the more measured and scholarly approach to
>  > > > > > solving problems that the Heritage Foundation takes makes much more
>  > > > > > sense….” – DJ
>
>  > > > > > Sense, perhaps…wisdom, no! Personally I find any blind use of
> ogmatic
>  > > > > > social philosophy to be anathema, even more so than simple fantasy
> nd/
>  > > > > > or hyperbole. The latter can show clarity while the former can not.
> e
>  > > > > > all have drunk some flavor of Kool-Aid...and some of us know it.
>
>  > > > > > On Sep 26, 12:56 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > > > >> Well I wouldn't go so far as to say I 'trust' them but I 
> definitely
>  > > > > >> respect them.  Like you say, they aren't shy about stating th
> eir
>  > > > > >> purpose.  They have some sound opinions on the health care bill
> hat
>  > > > > >> make a lot of sense to me.  Naomi Klein, on the other hand, comes
>  > > > > >> across as your typical purveyor of agitprop. I remember when she
> as
>  > > > > >> instrumental in playing the race card after Hurricane Katrina.
>  > > > > >> Writing some hogwash about Bush deliberately putting blacks at 
> risk
>  > > > > >> while saving whites after the storm. Just silly.  She has a 
> history
> f
>  > > > > >> fabricating truths and exaggerating evidence to support her own
> ick
>  > > > > >> fantasies.  I think the more measured and scholarly approach to
>  > > > > >> solving problems that the Heritage Foundation takes makes much 
> more
>  > > > > >> sense.
>
>  > > > > >> In a completely unrelated matter; why do so many 'activists'
> ide(or
>  > > > > >> at least obscure) their true ideologies?  People that live and
> reath
>  > > > > >> a Marxist doctrine will look you straight in the eye and tell you
> hey
>  > > > > >> aren't a communist.  Do you think they're ignorant, stupid or are
> hey
>  > > > > >> trying to put one over on us?  Not that there is anything wrong
> ith
>  > > > > >> being a communist...  I'm just curious what some of you think of
> he
>  > > > > >> often un-clever attempts of some journalists to muddy their
> olitical
>  > > > > >> leanings.  Do they think we're all stupid or som
> ething?
>
>  > > > > >> dj
>
>  > > > > >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM, ornamentalmind
>
>  > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > > > > >> > Around the time of the formation of this organization (The
> eritage
>  > > > > >> > Foundation) I had begun to become politically and economically
>  > > > aware.
>  > > > > >> > Quite quickly I learned to study who funded and ran such ‘think
>  > > > > >> > tanks’. Their stated mission:
>
>  > > > > >> > “Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a New Right think
> ank.
>  > > > > >> > Its stated mission is to formulate and promote conservative
> ublic
>  > > > > >> > policies based on the principles of "free enterprise, limited
>  > > > > >> > government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and
>
>  > > > > >> > strong national defense." It is widely considered one of the
> orld's
>  > > > > >> > most influential public policy research institutes.”
>
>  > > > > >> > …sounds innocent enough, no? And, they do come right out and
> tate
>  > > > > >> > their political and economic dogma.
>
>  > > > > >> >http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heritage_Foundation
>
>  > > > > >> > Further down the page, on the above link, one can find the
> rimary
>  > > > > >> > corporate funders of the foundation, big-pharma, tobacco,
> nsurance
>  > > > > >> > companies, military contractors.
>
>  > > > > >> > They, along with the Cato Institute and others
> who manufacture
>  > > > > >> > consent, are anathema to anyone other than the top 1% 
> financially
> n
>  > > > > >> > the US and similar people worldwide.
>
>  > > > > >> > From an article by Naomi Klein a year or so ago:
>
>  > > > > >> > “But, you know, I was interested that yesterday the Heritage
>  > > > > >> > Foundation, which has always been a staunch Friedmanite think
> ank,
>  > > > > >> > that they came out in favor of the bailout. They came out in
> avor
>  > > > of
>  > > > > >> > the bailout; they said it was vital. And what’s interesting 
> about
>  > > > that
>  > > > > >> > is, of course, the bailout is creating a crisis in the
> conomic—in
>  > > > the
>  > > > > >> > public sphere. It’s taking a private crisis, a crisis on Wall
>  > > > Street,
>  > > > > >> > which of course isn’t restricted to Wall Street, and it will
> ffect
>  > > > > >> > everyone, but it is moving it, moving those bad debts, onto the
>  > > > public
>  > > > > >> > books.”
>
>  > > > > >> > Her website:http://www.naomiklein.org/main
>
>  > > > > >> > …some of her views on the Heritage Fondation:
>  > > > > >> >http://www.naomiklein.org/search/node/the+heritage+foundation
>
>  > > > > >> > The most recent ‘Research’ by the Heritage Institute:
>
>  > > > > >> > September 25, 2009
>  > > > > >> > Defunding ACORN: Necessary and Proper, and Certainly
> onstitutional
>  > > > > >> > by
>  Hans A. von Spakovsky
>
>  > > > > >> >  September 25, 2009
>  > > > > >> > The Baucus Individual Health Insurance Mandate: Taxing 
> Low-Income
>  > > > and
>  > > > > >> > Moderate-Income Workers
>  > > > > >> > by Robert A. Book, Ph.D., Guinevere Nell, and Paul L. Winfree
>
>  > > > > >> >  September 25, 2009
>  > > > > >> > The Baucus Health Bill: A Medicare Physician Payment Shell Game
>  > > > > >> > by Dennis G. Smith
>
>  > > > > >> > The above is from their own site.
>
>  > > > > >> > I have never trusted this organization when it comes to helping
>  > > > > >> > humanity. They clearly continue to push the same old economic
> ogma
>  > > > > >> > that produced our current situation. I guess one gets what they
> ay
>  > > > > >> > for, no?
>
>  > > > > >> > On Sep 25, 5:24 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > > > >> >> April 2005
>  > > > > >> >> Top 10 Examples of Government Waste
>  > > > > >> >> by Brian M. Riedl
>
>  > > > > >> >> President George W. Bush has proposed terminat­ing or strongly
>  > > > > >> >> reducing the budgets of over 150 inef­ficient or ineffective
>  > > > programs.
>  > > > > >> >> This is a step in the right direction to pare back the runaway
>  > > > > >> >> spending that has pushed the budget deficit over $400 billion.
> n
>  > > > less
>  > > > > >> >> than three years, the first baby boomers will begin to collect
>  > > > Social
>  > >20> > >> >> Security: Lawmakers must therefore begin to reduce spending 
> now
> o
>  > > > > >> >> make room for the massive Social Security and Medicare costs
> hat
>  > > > will
>  > > > > >> >> follow.
>
>  > > > > >> >> The first
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to