Fair enough.  I personally don't have a problem with your delivery.
In fact, when I first started posting here I was probably a bit more
caustic then you have been.  I was used to Yahoo type chat rooms where
ridicule and sophism were the norm.  Here on Mind's Eye it's usually
more subtle and, when I can, I enjoy slipping the barbs in wrapped in
silk.  It's fun.  Which is what I'm here for.

dj


On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:00 PM, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not a neuro-typical. My delivery is often a cause of contention
> and there is precious little I can do to change that.
> I've been repeatedly toldhere that I'm "hate filled" and I view this
> as an attack as well as untrue. I don't have all of the emotion flying
> about unchecked that most people do. My emotions are simple and
> applied where they serve me best. When people like allan try to apply
> their own mental state to me, it is offensive and I will respond. No
> degradation was intended by that sentence, I was merely pointing out
> that I have both the capability and knowledge to do what he accused me
> of doing in methods and using information far better than he credits
> me with.
> I'm not adversarial, I simply have difficulty trying not to hurt
> peoples feelings. I get to "D" by following a well dilineated mental
> path that draws available information, by way of "A","B", and "C."
> From the moment of my first post, I've had a moderator pester me. If I
> get banned so be it. I haven't invested emotion here and don't plan
> to.
> Just because I apply my emotions to my interests and family does not
> mean that I cannot be offended, however. I simply don't become angry.
> What offends me is the purposeful destruction of language for personal
> and self-serving application. Without precise language I would not be
> able to communicate, something that is already difficult for myself
> and those like me. Knowledge and information are paramount, that is
> why we tend to do jobs neuro-typicals have difficulty in; such as
> science, innovative technologies, exploration, research, etc.. I can
> see the colours of physics in action, I can hear the sound of
> trigonometry and calculus, I can taste the developement of planets and
> suns. When less people are neuro-typical, more people will understand
> me.
>
> You didn't ask for all of this info, but I tire of being told what I
> think, intend, feel, or whatnot. Please note that I didn't personally
> attack him, I merely described what is quite visible and even proudly
> stated. I have come to understand that, for some reason, a few of the
> posters here are allowed carte blanche in personal insults and
> dismissing other peoples intelligence. I simply don't like that game
> and don't play it. I say what I mean and expect others to do the same,
> no matter how many times the typicals show they have no interest in
> doing so. What I view as an observation is simply that, no offence is
> hiding behind the words. When i insult, I do it well and devestatingly
> to a point.
>
> And for vam and others that will now say "AH HA, you are insulted so
> the insult must be true!" I'm not insulted. It does not recquire being
> wounded to know when someone aims and shoots at you.
>
>
>
> On Feb 5, 9:28 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:35 AM, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I don't care about slamming you, although it wouldn't be difficult if
>> > I wanted to. I simply use the information that you provided. You admit
>> > delusions both auditory and visual: schizophrenia. You enjoy them and
>> > have elevated them to divine: reluctance to medicate. Yes, that is an
>> > old adage.
>>
>> Fiddler, I agree with most of your opinions if not always in the way
>> you present them.  I rarely offer advice unless asked and this would
>> be the first time I've ever done anything like what I'm about to do.
>> With that ominous lead in I'll get right to it.
>>
>> It is quite possible to get your ideas and opinions across without
>> degrading your interlocutor.  Sentences like the first one in your
>> post above are simply unnecessary.  You could easily have phrased this
>> differently and gotten your opinion across just as well if not better.
>>  I believe you have the writing skills.  The only reason I'm saying
>> anything is because I'd like you to stick around and if you keep your
>> tone adversarial the moderators will start pestering you and then
>> you'll get your feelings hurt and leave.  I'd rather not see that
>> happen.
>>
>> dj
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 4, 11:02 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Interesting Fid,
>>
>> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > You see what you choose to see. If you knew how little emotion I have
>> >> > invested in random strangers in online chat groups... I have even less
>> >> > invested in unmedicated schizophrenics.
>>
>> >> So your argument is that if you can not slam them you call the person an
>> >> unmedicated schizophrenic that is very kind of you to give me your medical
>> >> diagnosis..  I think I will stick with my friends that are actually 
>> >> doctors
>> >> and psychiatrist. I am not a doctor and can not give a diagnosis  but 
>> >> there
>> >> is an old adage what we see in others is exactly what we see in our 
>> >> selves.
>> >> Allan
>>
>> >> On Feb 3, 11:27 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > I understand Orn when I read what fid is writing  I do not see an 
>> >> > exchange
>> >> > of ideas  but what appears to be a foaming hate filled being. If he is
>> >> going
>> >> > to university with an attitude like that it would be a wonder if he 
>> >> > could
>> >> > get through even a single class.
>> >> > Allan
>>
>> >> > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:32 AM, ornamentalmind <
>> >> > [email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > Truth be told...I cut fid a lot of slack. He's going to university,
>> >> > > > studying a lot of stuff, interacting on numerous online groups....I
>> >> > > > know that more than once I hurried through posts missing the intent.
>> >> > > > Oh, and I also remember when I knew a lot of stuff and knew others
>> >> > > > didnt...and attempted to put interaction and discussion into a
>> >> > > > box...with tenets and rules and all of that...which I'd attempt to
>> >> > > > impose on everyone else. Doing such things surely make the universe 
>> >> > > > a
>> >> > > > more 'friendly', if not understood, place.
>>
>> >> > > > On Feb 3, 2:12 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > > > Fid you are dealing with a bunch of old people here who ahve been
>> >> > around
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > > bush a time or two.
>>
>> >> > > > > Since you like simple sentences I will give you one to ponder.
>>
>> >> > > > > I know God is real because I have meet and seen him. He has 
>> >> > > > > spoken to
>> >> > me.
>> >> > > > I
>> >> > > > > have spoken to him, and which is even more amazing he is my 
>> >> > > > > friend.
>> >> > > > > Allan
>>
>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:53 PM, fiddler <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > When you learn the difference between personal bias and dogma I
>> >> > will
>> >> > > > > > be quite impressed.
>>
>> >> > > > > > On Feb 3, 8:31 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > Hahahah you are a funny one Fidds, and you still have just not
>> >> > got it
>> >> > > > > > > yet I see.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > Dogma -
>>
>> >> > > > > > > 1. a system of principles or tenets, as of a church.
>> >> > > > > > > 2. a specific tenet or doctrine authoritatively laid down, as 
>> >> > > > > > > by
>> >> > a
>> >> > > > > > > church: the dogma of the Assumption.
>> >> > > > > > > 3. prescribed doctrine: political dogma.
>> >> > > > > > > 4. a settled or established opinion, belief, or principle.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > Your insistance that those of religious faith are, not
>> >> > intelectual,
>> >> > > > > > > peddle nonsense, and are liars is certianly evidance of 
>> >> > > > > > > number 4
>> >> > on
>> >> > > > > > > the list above.  So indeed yes I agree we should all learn 
>> >> > > > > > > what
>> >> > the
>> >> > > > > > > words we use mean.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > As to labeling people my friend you have not ceased doing that
>> >> > from
>> >> > > > > > > the moment you joined us.  Umm pot - kettle me thinks.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > Yet another angry man who can dish it yet cannot take it.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > On 3 Feb, 16:20, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > I really overestimated your intelligence...
>> >> > > > > > > > Listen fundie: quit telling me what I think, promote, 
>> >> > > > > > > > desire,
>> >> > or
>> >> > > > mean.
>> >> > > > > > > > I know you people like reading volumes into sentences, but 
>> >> > > > > > > > it
>> >> > never
>> >> > > > > > > > looks well on you. Learn what simple concepts like dogma
>> >> > actually
>> >> > > > > > > > mean, your priest and those fundie websites lie to you. Just
>> >> > > > because
>> >> > > > > > > > you feel the need to label people with your own handicaps 
>> >> > > > > > > > does
>> >> > not
>> >> > > > > > > > make it so, it just insures you won't understand what other
>> >> > people
>> >> > > > are
>> >> > > > > > > > talking about.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > On Feb 3, 7:01 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
>> >> > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > “…I'm against children having their minds polluted by
>> >> > mysticism,
>> >> > > > > > > > > nonsense, and lies perpetrated by politicians and 
>> >> > > > > > > > > priests.” –
>> >> > fid
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > Then you must be for removing children from their parents 
>> >> > > > > > > > > at
>> >> > a
>> >> > > > very
>> >> > > > > > > > > young age and raising them in ‘free thinking’ 
>> >> > > > > > > > > enclaves…thus
>> >> > > > > > protecting
>> >> > > > > > > > > them from all of what your dogma defines as ‘nonsense’.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 8:50 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> 
>> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > The gatherings for sports, special subject education,
>> >> > social
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > interaction, etc, are always with other like-minded
>> >> > families.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > Thus removing that messy and uncomfortable situation in
>> >> > which
>> >> > > > one
>> >> > > > > > is
>> >> > > > > > > > > > around those not of a like mind? This breeds intolerance
>> >> > and
>> >> > > > sad
>> >> > > > > > > > > > subjugation to dogmas and narrow minded worldviews. Not
>> >> > that
>> >> > > > I'm
>> >> > > > > > for
>> >> > > > > > > > > > the public, factory worker, indoctrination system; only
>> >> > that
>> >> > > > I'm
>> >> > > > > > > > > > against children having their minds polluted by 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > mysticism,
>> >> > > > > > nonsense,
>> >> > > > > > > > > > and lies perpetrated by politicians and priests.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 4:27 pm, MajorOz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 3:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.hslda.org/laws/default.asp
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.hslda.org/legislation/state/default.asp
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.hslda.org/orgs/default.asp
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Many Public Schools have been turning out idiots, 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > kids
>> >> > that
>> >> > > > > > can't read
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > or read at a poor level.  Kids can enhance their
>> >> > > > socialization
>> >> > > > > > skills
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > in extra curricular activities, sports events and 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > other
>> >> > > > social
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > functions.  Home schooled children are not isolated
>> >> > > > prisoners
>> >> > > > > > confined
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > to parental control.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > Not completely isolated, but, in a practical sense, 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > most
>> >> > are.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > In my experience (and my daughter home schooled her 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > four
>> >> > > > until
>> >> > > > > > she
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > realized it was doing them a disservice) home 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > schooling
>> >> > > > exists
>> >> > > > > > because
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > parents aren't so much interested in doing something 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > FOR
>> >> > the
>> >> > > > kids
>> >> > > > > > as
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > they are in attempting to keep them from being 
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > exposed to
>> >> > ...
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > whatever.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > Apostasy is encountered only by accident.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > cheers
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > > oz- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > > > --
>> >> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> >> > > > > > Google
>> >> > > > Groups
>> >> > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> >> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> >> > <minds-eye%[email protected]<minds-eye%252bunsubscr...@googleg­roups.com>
>>
>> >> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> >> > > > > > .
>> >> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
>> >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>> >> > > > > --
>> >> > > > > (
>> >> > > > >  )
>> >> > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> > Groups
>> >> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> >> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> >> > <minds-eye%[email protected]<minds-eye%252bunsubscr...@googleg­roups.com>
>>
>> >> > > > .
>> >> > > > For more options, visit this group at
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to