Meh!  I think you place too much emphasis on the vs, I really didn't
mean it that way.

On 8 Mar, 21:53, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> "we like to work vs other similar internet forums"
> The problem with the versus motivation is that there is no other
> productive motivation left should the versus orientation disappear. I
> mean, can't you see what has been happening to this group since the
> pink bubble dreams were being poured into the threads? People go and
> find their freedom fighter colleagues elsewhere.
>
> On 8 Mrz., 17:40, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hah I would go further and declare that all people fall into the
> > confines of their culture.  Seemingly includeing those of us that are
> > rather counter culture orintated.
>
> > I would say though that we do have a culture here, we only need to
> > look at the 'rules' here to see that a certian amount of respect is
> > required for each other, that it is fine to attack whatever idea you
> > like here as long as the attack Is on th eidea and not the person.
> > Hah how many newbies do we get here that tell of their supprise on how
> > we like to work vs other similar internet forums?  For example.
>
> > We have seen also that it requires a period of time for some of these
> > newcomers to get used to this.  Suggesting of course that such is not
> > widedly prevelant throughout Internet Forums.  Indeed I think we can
> > all attest to this?
>
> > On 8 Mar, 16:12, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I guess in that sense it is true.  I'm thinking though, that a true
> > > global culture would exist only from the view point of an
> > > extraterrestrial as the earth culture, the culture of "Earthlings".
>
> > > The Earthling Culture, coming soon to a theater near you!
>
> > > I don't know that Minds Eye has a definite culture but just the
> > > meeting of minds of different cultures.  I wouldn't view us as a
> > > distinct culture but just that we might be part of an Internet
> > > Culture; we are not a culture of our own.
>
> > > By genetic culture I mean cultures that are derived from ethnicity,
> > > where in most cases being born into and growing up within that culture
> > > will dictate, with exceptions, behavioral patterns.  I think cultures
> > > can have a propensity towards specific behavior, which can and will be
> > > affected by extenuating circumstance, that is understood.  But
> > > cultures will have their peculiarities and unique characteristics
> > > regardless of the blending into a larger culture, like trolls in the
> > > Internet culture.  We can broadly identify the Internet Culture but
> > > within the culture exists the trolls, flamers, etc.  To integrate
> > > cultures we have to see beyond cultural relativism which lends to
> > > cultural stereotyping.  In this sense maybe McKenna is correct, that
> > > culture in many ways is not your friend.  Attitudes can change
> > > drastically in a room full of people who know nothing about each other
> > > as soon as each shares their cultural heritage.  McKenna makes a
> > > strong point about not having to live up to ones cultural heritage and
> > > I agree with that.  Unfortunately most people fall into the confines
> > > of their culture.
>
> > > On Mar 8, 8:08 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Yes Slip I agree.  Well I agree that Global culture can only consist
> > > > of multiple cultures.  Well at the start anyway.
>
> > > > This is not a problem though, as Molly points out in the post a few
> > > > above this one. There are cultures everywhere, Minds Eye has a
> > > > definate cultre.
>
> > > > So with this in mind I find that I have to disagree that culture is
> > > > somehow genetic.
>
> > > > Rather like the old argument about 'gender roles' I think there is
> > > > scope to belive that culture is learnt behaviour and does not have any
> > > > genetic basis.
>
> > > > Rigsy below also highlights for us the conept of teen culture.  This
> > > > certianly changes from generation to generation.
>
> > > > On 8 Mar, 13:12, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > We can strive for a global culture but one can only abandon the
> > > > > culture of origin to a degree, hence we have African Americans and
> > > > > American Indians.  We can easily see that ones culture can dominate
> > > > > behavior, something of a predictor of style and course in life, a
> > > > > stereotypical behavior but no matter how much one can break away from
> > > > > it there remains the cultural traits ingrained in the person, possibly
> > > > > genetically bound.  Global culture could only consist of multiple
> > > > > cultures.
>
> > > > > On Mar 8, 6:38 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > It's a hard one alright.
>
> > > > > > I belive that culture is ultimatly divisive, yet we are all cuaght 
> > > > > > up
> > > > > > in it.  It defines us, perhaps then we should be striveing for the
> > > > > > global culture?
>
> > > > > > On 7 Mar, 09:57, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I tend to agree culture is not our frien, yet it gives us the 
> > > > > > > foundation
> > > > > > > from which we need to examine our lives.
> > > > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > "Culture is not your friend, no matter what your culture is. 
> > > > > > > > And this
> > > > > > > > is sort of not a Politically Correct thing to say, because in 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > present ambience, (sort of, those who haven't gotten the word) 
> > > > > > > > there's
> > > > > > > > a lot of attention to recovering our ethnic roots and to 
> > > > > > > > expressing
> > > > > > > > our unique ethnicity, and so forth and so on -- I think that's 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > beginning of understanding. But all terms that stress ethnicity 
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > words applied to groups of people. Have you ever noticed that? 
> > > > > > > > Have
> > > > > > > > you ever noticed that you're not a group of people, you're a 
> > > > > > > > person?
> > > > > > > > So you may be "Jewish", you may be "Black", you may be this, 
> > > > > > > > you may
> > > > > > > > be that but there is no obligation to take upon yourself the
> > > > > > > > generalized quality of these things, because the generalized 
> > > > > > > > qualities
> > > > > > > > belong to thousands of people examined at a time. If you 
> > > > > > > > misunderstand
> > > > > > > > that you become a caricature. You act out your ethnicity as a
> > > > > > > > caricature.
>
> > > > > > > > So culture is not your friend, ideology is not your friend... 
> > > > > > > > Who's
> > > > > > > > your friend? Well, to my mind, the felt presence of immediate
> > > > > > > > experience is the surest dimension, the surest guide that you 
> > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > possibly have. The felt presence of immediate experience. 
> > > > > > > > Feeling is
> > > > > > > > primary. All rationalization and intellectualization and 
> > > > > > > > analysis is
> > > > > > > > secondary, and comes out of culture. No matter what your 
> > > > > > > > culture is,
> > > > > > > > it has answers. Cultures thinks up answers. So a child asks its 
> > > > > > > > mother
> > > > > > > > a question, like, "Where do we go when we die?" or, "Why does 
> > > > > > > > Daddy go
> > > > > > > > to work?" Cultural answers are always provided, but nobody 
> > > > > > > > knows the
> > > > > > > > real answers to these questions -- that's outside of culture. So
> > > > > > > > coming to terms and fully expressing your culture is like a 
> > > > > > > > stage in
> > > > > > > > development. And then beyond that lies the aspiration of the 
> > > > > > > > felt
> > > > > > > > presence of immediate experience, and its implications. It's a 
> > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > hard thing to deal with and to do when you are poisoned with 
> > > > > > > > ideology.
> > > > > > > > And ideologies are very difficult to deconstruct and rid 
> > > > > > > > yourself of
> > > > > > > > through a simple talking therapy of some sort, through simply 
> > > > > > > > trying
> > > > > > > > to work it out. The best antidote for ideology is to raise the
> > > > > > > > intensity of the felt presence of experience to such 
> > > > > > > > excruciating
> > > > > > > > levels that it simply vaporizes ideological illusion. And this 
> > > > > > > > is what
> > > > > > > > psychedelics are for, I think. And it also explains (if you've 
> > > > > > > > ever
> > > > > > > > wondered) the incredible phobia of these things on the part of 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > establishment, the incredibly deep alarm that these things 
> > > > > > > > trigger in
> > > > > > > > people" - Terence McKenna
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.salvia-divinorum-scotland.co.uk/quotes/mckenna/cultureisno...
>
> > > > > > > > What do you think?
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> > > > > > > > Google Groups
> > > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­­­­.com>
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > (
> > > > > > >  )
> > > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to