I doubted anyone would understand my measurement system and everyone here is proving I'm right. Thank you all.
On Apr 28, 2:13 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > What is consciousness ? Is it ' something ?' If yes, what ? Please use > words signifying the something(s), so that it can understood, perhaps > measured. > > On Apr 28, 4:43 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 28 Apr, 11:55, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > God is not made of any substance or energy, rather everything emanates > > > from him. He is above all attributes and the source of all. > > > I would completely refute that. To date, we have discovered nothing > > that exists that is not comprised of energy. It is energy that > > exists. If you can find something that is NOT energy, then, please, > > do so and take the Nobel Prize in Physics. If God does not consist of > > 'something', then He must consist of 'nothing' and nothing can EVER > > come from nothing. Rather, God must consist of some substance and, > > the only underlying substance we have ever discovered is energy, > > albeit in countless 'forms'. Nothin could emanate from nothing. So > > that statement, too, I refute. Rather, everything emantates from (or, > > as I would term it, everything is an extension of) God. He has many > > attributes, 99 according to Islam. I can use just three to derive the > > rest from. If He is completely beyond attributes, He can do nothing. > > Therefore, if you state that He has no attributes, then He is NOT > > omnipotent, as omnipotence is an attribute. Without omnipotenece, He > > is impotent. And, even Impotence would be an attribute. But it would > > be no attribute of an effective deity. He cannot be the source of all > > if He is, in fact, nothing (made of any substance or energy), as you > > suggest. Do try to re-think this one. I would bet every soul on my > > statement that God is an entity of energy (and that is a very heavy > > bet, indeed). Are you that sure of your statements, as stated, above? > > > > On Apr 27, 4:50 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 26 Apr, 22:48, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > > This thread for me is just great, as it seems to describe God in a way > > > > > that even the atheist may accept and it is more or less just as I see > > > > > God. Just to say my own personal views I am going to describe my God > > > > > for you thus: > > > > > God may well be the positive-life-energy that exists in the whole > > > > > universe; therefore, God is life and life is God himself and one > > > > > cannot exist without the other. We should believe in God, because if > > > > > God is not there, there is no life and we are all dead. What do you > > > > > think? Do you think I maybe right about it? > > > > > My regards to everyone > > > > > Manfraco > > > > > Well, it's a bit more complicated than that. If we equate energy (be > > > > that positive or negative or matter/antimatter) with 'the substance of > > > > God', that is, the 'stuff' that God is made of, then everything that > > > > exists is made of that God-originating substance. That is my view on > > > > it. If we deny that energy exists, we're idiots, because it does. > > > > The question is: Is that energy somehow joined and, if so, how and > > > > where? These are the bases for my theory and I show how and where the > > > > energy is joined. Once that energy is 'unified' or, more precisely, > > > > shown to be undivided, then we can discuss that energy as a 'whole'. > > > > And that 'whole' is everywhere energy is, throughout all of space- > > > > time, therefore omnipresent. That energy is, because it is joined > > > > (or, rather, never divided in the first place!), only one entity made > > > > of energy. That entity is the only actor in the system and is, > > > > therefore, omnipotent. Irrespective of the exact mechanisms involved > > > > in consciousness, if there is only one, indivisible actor in the > > > > system, then ALL consciousness is retained by that entity, therefore, > > > > that entity is omniscient. Thus, the entity is omnipresent, > > > > omnipotent and omniscient, fulfilling the three basic requirements for > > > > deity. That's how I get from describing a particular configuration of > > > > energy (which could be viewed in an atheistic fashion) yet it leads > > > > one to a deistic paradigm, once one has realised that 'the > > > > configuration that energy has taken' actually defines itself AS God by > > > > virtue of it maintaining the three required attributes of deity. > > > > > > On Apr 26, 9:44 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 25 Apr, 16:38, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > God may or may not be conscious. Some of us are conscious and we > > > > > > > would like to think that someone consciously designed us rather > > > > > > > than to imagine we may be designed by convergence not by > > > > > > > conscious creation. If however, However if indeed God is > > > > > > > conscious - as some of us are conscious - then we are able to > > > > > > > make choices. The choices we cannot avoid making are those > > > > > > > choices that have to do with the necessity of solving problems of > > > > > > > daily living. The best choices are those that are derived from > > > > > > > making informed decisions. Informed decisions are derived from > > > > > > > applying critical thinking which also include contributions of > > > > > > > the heart, and soul. > > > > > > > A God that is not conscious could not be omniscient. A God that is > > > > > > omniscient is not conscious in the same way that we are, as we are > > > > > > not > > > > > > omniscient. God cannot tire, as He is Omnipotent, therefore, He > > > > > > requires no rest, again, unlike our form of consciousness that > > > > > > requires rest. Whilst there are similarities, there are vast > > > > > > differences. Likeness is not equality, therefore, when it is said > > > > > > we > > > > > > are created in His likeness, do not expect that our existence is, in > > > > > > any way, equal to His. Rather, our existence is 'like' His in > > > > > > certain > > > > > > respects, but completely unlike in others. A careful consideration > > > > > > of > > > > > > the three qualities of omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence > > > > > > (both > > > > > > transcendant and immanent) are required to make a proper analysis. > > > > > > The choices that we cannot avoid making are those that are events > > > > > > that > > > > > > are extant in the space-time continuum, all others simply will nor > > > > > > occur and you will never experience them. If you experience > > > > > > something, then you know that it was always a part of the continuum > > > > > > and you know (albeit after the fact!!) that it was necessary. > > > > > > > > The capability and the ability to make informed decisions also > > > > > > > implies the right and I think the responsibility of every person > > > > > > > to dissent from those opinions which are deemed ill informed. > > > > > > > This means that whatever we call God is not the final authority > > > > > > > with respect to what is ultimately considered to be in each > > > > > > > persons best interest. > > > > > > > Rather, God is the final authority irrespective of our views OF said > > > > > > deity, by the necessity of the defining quality of omnipotence. > > > > > > Otherwise, you must assume that you have some authority that God > > > > > > does > > > > > > not and THAT is incompatible with omnipotence. > > > > > > > > The long winded point I am trying to make is that with respect to > > > > > > > whatever data is singled out - i.e. God, unity - consciousness - > > > > > > > each person brings something of himself (consciously or > > > > > > > unconsciously) in interpreting what those concepts means to him > > > > > > > or her. Thus each person ultimately is his own final authority. > > > > > > > Thank God. > > > > > > > Nicely put, yet you will answer to an omnipotent entity--if, of > > > > > > course, said entity exists. But, its existence is NOT dependent > > > > > > upon > > > > > > our views, as our data is greatly lacking and His, of course, due to > > > > > > His omniscience, is full and complete down to the quantum state of > > > > > > the > > > > > > entire continuum. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Sent: Sun, Apr 25, 2010 9:37 am > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: God and I > > > > > > > > but they cannot survive in isolation can they... > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 9:12 AM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Energy leads to action, God to consciousness. One is effort, the > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > is knowledge. Body without consciousness is mud, Life without > > > > > > > spirit > > > > > > > is incomprehensible. > > > > > > > > On Apr 24, 8:15 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > God is neither he nor she..pure energy thats all..and that is > > > > > > > > wat > > > > > > > > flows through every one of us..and will flow after our time is > > > > > > > > done..we are it.. it is us... > > > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 9:23 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > God is pure consciousness, formless, unborn, eternal, > > > > > > > > > indestructible > > > > > > > > > and the source, the spirit and the end of all. We are > > > > > > > > > conscious, have > > > > > > > > > a form, are born, live and die. Our only solace is that we > > > > > > > > > arise from > > > > > > > > > him, are upheld by him and go back to him. He is the Truth > > > > > > > > > and we are > > > > > > > > > just his reflections and vanish when the vessel dies. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > > > > > > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > > > > > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > For more options, visit > > ... > > read more »
