a differing shame concept........wow.... On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? Also I > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the blog > link in the given context as a reference to find further information/ > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as part of a > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept. > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right about your > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that most people > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you are doing is > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said about the > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those you listed. > the > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know it everything > > already. > > Allan > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with links > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct folks to > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered shameless > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like links > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion etc. > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to be a > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no common-sense > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May 18, > > > 2010) : > > > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in the > > > course of a discussion. > > > > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a > > > conversation. > > > You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, in > > > terms > > > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for > > > everyone > > > here. > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with alphabet > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do not > > > deserve anything else than that. > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group. > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> > wrote:> > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan. "A > loose > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations posited > by > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to reflect > the > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement." > > > > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization. > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good & the > bad. > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why do > such > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to be > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such political > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It is the > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot not > be > > > > > blamed for that. > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe > giving > > > the > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage point?! > > > > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will never > > > > > become multipolar system. > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | eHow.comhttp:// > > >www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... > > > > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have > shown > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding links.) > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree that you > are > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post implies > > > duality > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but an > > > illusion. > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics as > well > > > as > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING > anything > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye > space as > > > far > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is competitive > and > > > will > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not an > issue. > > > The > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and persevering. > > > > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. My > > > objection > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite > layers, > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar system. > So, > > > now > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of layers > on > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye... > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually boil down to a > > > bipolar > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are part > of > > > organised > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. > > > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, Minds-Eye > space > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be > infinite, > > > in this > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get > > > challenged... > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last > > > post: Mar > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in > each > > > layer > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no > end > > > as the > > > > > > > > > > past is ... > > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8. > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am > hearing > > > a lot > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I > expounded my > > > belief I > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted text > - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > ( > > ) > > I_D Allan > > > > Be Paranoid. > > God is always building a better idiot!!! > -- \--/ Peace
