Perhaps as in moderators can be shady at times? :P Shades of mind is
an interesting concept though!

On Jul 19, 1:03 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> shades?.. really?... in what sense...you mean shades of mind..? i didnt
> really give it an actual thought except for taking it at face
> value;-)..becoz i found it interesting..you can illuminate it for me..
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > now that I hear you saying it, it could somehow be related to shade
> > concept, what do you sense?
>
> > On 18 Jul., 09:19, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > a differing shame concept........wow....
>
> >  > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? Also I
> > > > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the blog
> > > > link in the given context as a reference to find further information/
> > > > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've
> > > > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as part of a
> > > > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept.
>
> > > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right about your
> > > > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that most
> > people
> > > > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you are
> > doing is
> > > > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said about
> > the
> > > > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those you
> > listed.
> > > > the
> > > > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know it
> > everything
> > > > > already.
> > > > > Allan
>
> > > >  > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with links
> > > > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct folks
> > to
> > > > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered
> > shameless
> > > > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like
> > links
> > > > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion.
>
> > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion etc.
> > > > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education
> > > > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to be
> > a
> > > > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no
> > common-sense
> > > > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a
> > > > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May
> > 18,
> > > > > > 2010) :
> > > > > >     I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in
> > the
> > > > > >     course of a discussion.
>
> > > > > >     Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a
> > > > > > conversation.
> > > > > >     You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, in
> > > > > > terms
> > > > > >     and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for
> > > > > > everyone
> > > > > >     here.
>
> > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your
> > > > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is
> > > > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with
> > alphabet
> > > > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do
> > not
> > > > > > deserve anything else than that.
>
> > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of
> > > > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless
> > > > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group.
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:>
> > > > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional
> > > > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan.
> > "A
> > > > loose
> > > > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations
> > posited
> > > > by
> > > > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in
> > > > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to
> > reflect
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement."
>
> > > > > > > >         The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization.
> > > > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good &
> > the
> > > > bad.
> > > > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why
> > do
> > > > such
> > > > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to be
> > > > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such
> > political
> > > > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It is
> > the
> > > > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot
> > not
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > blamed for that.
>
> > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe
> > > > giving
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage point?!
>
> > > > > > > >      In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will
> > never
> > > > > > > > become multipolar system.
>
> > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | eHow.comhttp://
> > > > > >www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4...
>
> > > > > > > >      Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have
> > > > shown
> > > > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding
> > links.)
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree that
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post
> > implies
> > > > > > duality
> > > > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but an
> > > > > > illusion.
> > > > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics
> > as
> > > > well
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING
> > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye
> > > > space as
> > > > > > far
> > > > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is
> > competitive
> > > > and
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not
> > an
> > > > issue.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and
> > persevering.
>
> > > > > > > > > >      I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. My
> > > > > > objection
> > > > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite
> > > > layers,
> > > > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar
> > system.
> > > > So,
> > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of
> > layers
> > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > >       Any multiverse system will eventually boil down
> > to a
> > > > > > bipolar
> > > > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are
> > part
> > > > of
> > > > > > organised
> > > > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option.
> > > > > > > > > > > >       Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So,
> > Minds-Eye
> > > > space
> > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be
> > > > infinite,
> > > > > > in this
> > > > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get
> > > > > > challenged...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye  -  2 posts  -  2 authors  -
> > Last
> > > > > > post:  Mar
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and
> > in
> > > > each
> > > > > > layer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and
> > no
> > > > end
> > > > > > as the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > past is ...
>
> >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8.
> > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am
> > > > hearing
> > > > > > a lot
> > > > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I
> > > > expounded my
> > > > > > belief I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted
> > text
> > > > -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
> > > > >  (
> > > > >   )
> > > > > I_D Allan
>
> > > > > Be Paranoid.
> > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!!
>
> > > --
> > > \--/ Peace
>
> --
> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to