A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? Also I
don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the blog
link in the given context as a reference to find further information/
reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've
learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as part of a
culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept.

On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right about your
> shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that most people
> that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you are doing is
> really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said about the
> moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those you listed. the
> path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know it everything
> already.
> Allan
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with links
> > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct folks to
> > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered shameless
> > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like links
> > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion.
>
> > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion etc.
> > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education
> > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to be a
> > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no common-sense
> > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a
> > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May 18,
> > 2010) :
> >     I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in the
> >     course of a discussion.
>
> >     Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a
> > conversation.
> >     You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, in
> > terms
> >     and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for
> > everyone
> >     here.
>
> > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your
> > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is
> > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with alphabet
> > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do not
> > deserve anything else than that.
>
> > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of
> > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless
> > guideline of Minds-Eye group.
>
> > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:>
> > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional
> > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan. "A loose
> > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations posited by
> > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in
> > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to reflect the
> > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement."
>
> > > >         The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization.
> > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good & the bad.
> > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why do such
> > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to be
> > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such political
> > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It is the
> > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot not be
> > > > blamed for that.
>
> > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe giving
> > the
> > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage point?!
>
> > > >      In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will never
> > > > become multipolar system.
>
> > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | eHow.comhttp://
> >www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4...
>
> > > >      Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have shown
> > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding links.)
>
> > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]>
> > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree that you are
> > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post implies
> > duality
> > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but an
> > illusion.
> > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics as well
> > as
> > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING anything
> > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye space as
> > far
> > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is competitive and
> > will
> > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not an issue.
> > The
> > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and persevering.
>
> > > > > >      I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. My
> > objection
> > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite layers,
> > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar system. So,
> > now
> > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of layers on
> > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye...
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >       Any multiverse system will eventually boil down to a
> > bipolar
> > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are part of
> > organised
> > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option.
> > > > > > > >       Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, Minds-Eye space
> > cannot
> > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be infinite,
> > in this
> > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get
> > challenged...
>
> > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye  -  2 posts  -  2 authors  - Last
> > post:  Mar
> > > > > > > > > 12, 2008
> > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each
> > layer
> > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end
> > as the
> > > > > > > > > past is ...
> >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8...
>
> > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing
> > a lot
> > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my
> > belief I
> > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> I_D Allan
>
> Be Paranoid.
> God is always building a better idiot!!!

Reply via email to