wow..that was an argument over the 'eye'.. so why dont they use the color wheel? how do you know its plastic..;-)
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:56 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, shades of mind is good. Better than this monochrome blue plastic > eye, like I said: > > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye/browse_frm/thread/b34c37072ddda478/85e1846e157e3bdf?lnk=gst&q=goethe+#85e1846e157e3bdf > > On 19 Jul., 17:45, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps as in moderators can be shady at times? :P Shades of mind is > > an interesting concept though! > > > > On Jul 19, 1:03 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > shades?.. really?... in what sense...you mean shades of mind..? i didnt > > > really give it an actual thought except for taking it at face > > > value;-)..becoz i found it interesting..you can illuminate it for me.. > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > now that I hear you saying it, it could somehow be related to shade > > > > concept, what do you sense? > > > > > > On 18 Jul., 09:19, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > a differing shame concept........wow.... > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? Also > I > > > > > > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the > blog > > > > > > link in the given context as a reference to find further > information/ > > > > > > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've > > > > > > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as part > of a > > > > > > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept. > > > > > > > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right about > your > > > > > > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that > most > > > > people > > > > > > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you > are > > > > doing is > > > > > > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said > about > > > > the > > > > > > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those you > > > > listed. > > > > > > the > > > > > > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know it > > > > everything > > > > > > > already. > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with > links > > > > > > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct > folks > > > > to > > > > > > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered > > > > shameless > > > > > > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise > like > > > > links > > > > > > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self > promotion etc. > > > > > > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist > education > > > > > > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems > to be > > > > a > > > > > > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no > > > > common-sense > > > > > > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote > a > > > > > > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" > (May > > > > 18, > > > > > > > > 2010) : > > > > > > > > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > course of a discussion. > > > > > > > > > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a > > > > > > > > conversation. > > > > > > > > You only put across yourself, what you know and have to > say, in > > > > > > > > terms > > > > > > > > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak > for > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to > your > > > > > > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which > is > > > > > > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with > > > > alphabet > > > > > > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you > do > > > > not > > > > > > > > deserve anything else than that. > > > > > > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment > of > > > > > > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the > meaningless > > > > > > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight < > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by > Kaplan. > > > > "A > > > > > > loose > > > > > > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international > relations > > > > posited > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process > in > > > > > > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to > > > > reflect > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement." > > > > > > > > > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of > civilization. > > > > > > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the > good & > > > > the > > > > > > bad. > > > > > > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. > Then why > > > > do > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear > to be > > > > > > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such > > > > political > > > > > > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. > It is > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model > cannot > > > > not > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > blamed for that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D > universe > > > > > > giving > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage > point?! > > > > > > > > > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system > will > > > > never > > > > > > > > > > become multipolar system. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | > eHow.comhttp:// > > > > > > > > > www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You > have > > > > > > shown > > > > > > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding > > > > links.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would > agree that > > > > you > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your > post > > > > implies > > > > > > > > duality > > > > > > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is > but an > > > > > > > > illusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum > physics > > > > as > > > > > > well > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of > PROVING > > > > > > anything > > > > > > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in > Minds-Eye > > > > > > space as > > > > > > > > far > > > > > > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is > > > > competitive > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is > not > > > > an > > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and > > > > persevering. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my > post. My > > > > > > > > objection > > > > > > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of > infinite > > > > > > layers, > > > > > > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar > > > > system. > > > > > > So, > > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number > of > > > > layers > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually boil > down > > > > to a > > > > > > > > bipolar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you > are > > > > part > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > organised > > > > > > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, > > > > Minds-Eye > > > > > > space > > > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to > be > > > > > > infinite, > > > > > > > > in this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will > always get > > > > > > > > challenged... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 > authors - > > > > Last > > > > > > > > post: Mar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite > layers and > > > > in > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > layer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no > beginning and > > > > no > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > as the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > past is ... > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8 > . > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as > above. I am > > > > > > hearing > > > > > > > > a lot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when > I > > > > > > expounded my > > > > > > > > belief I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide > quoted > > > > text > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > I_D Allan > > > > > > > > > Be Paranoid. > > > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!! > > > > > > > -- > > > > > \--/ Peace > > > > ... > > > > Erfahren Sie mehr ยป -- \--/ Peace
