I have found it valuable to consider the concept and experience of time from two different perspectives. These two perspectives are linear time and durational time. Linear time is conventional clock time with there existing a felt sense of past time, present here and now time, and future time.
Durational time is equivalent to vacation, and childhood time experienced as timelessness. These two senses of time sometimes coincide as in the experience of lucid dreaming, and in experiences such as that of Proust in Remembrances of Time Past. Here both circles of time overlap. My personal sense is that there is in fact no time. As human beings we fill perceived emptiness with meanings. -----Original Message----- From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, Jul 20, 2010 6:42 am Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes i thought of continuing in the same thread becoz it seems connected to it...what are your ideas about time..i mean your experience of it...when i htought about it , i felt.. well i'll explain it this way.. its as though i am standing in a river.. facing the current..and the water just flows flows beneath me.. and i am rooted to the same spot...this making of time.. or objectifying it.. it distorts a lot doesnt it...i mean when you say there is not enuf time.. how can that be...we have all the Time we need...my thoughts are confused and unclear..but i'd like you all to say something... On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM, pol.science kid <[email protected]> wrote: wow..that was an argument over the 'eye'.. so why dont they use the color wheel? how do you know its plastic..;-) On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:56 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, shades of mind is good. Better than this monochrome blue plastic eye, like I said: http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye/browse_frm/thread/b34c37072ddda478/85e1846e157e3bdf?lnk=gst&q=goethe+#85e1846e157e3bdf On 19 Jul., 17:45, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps as in moderators can be shady at times? :P Shades of mind is > an interesting concept though! > > On Jul 19, 1:03 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > shades?.. really?... in what sense...you mean shades of mind..? i didnt > > really give it an actual thought except for taking it at face > > value;-)..becoz i found it interesting..you can illuminate it for me.. > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > now that I hear you saying it, it could somehow be related to shade > > > concept, what do you sense? > > > > On 18 Jul., 09:19, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > a differing shame concept........wow.... > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? Also I > > > > > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the blog > > > > > link in the given context as a reference to find further information/ > > > > > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've > > > > > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as part of a > > > > > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept. > > > > > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right about your > > > > > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that most > > > people > > > > > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you are > > > doing is > > > > > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said about > > > the > > > > > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those you > > > listed. > > > > > the > > > > > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know it > > > everything > > > > > > already. > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with > > > > > > > > links > > > > > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct > > > > > > > > folks > > > to > > > > > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally considered > > > shameless > > > > > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like > > > links > > > > > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. > > > > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion > > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education > > > > > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to > > > > > > > be > > > a > > > > > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no > > > common-sense > > > > > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a > > > > > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May > > > 18, > > > > > > > 2010) : > > > > > > > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in > > > the > > > > > > > course of a discussion. > > > > > > > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a > > > > > > > conversation. > > > > > > > You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > terms > > > > > > > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your > > > > > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is > > > > > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with > > > alphabet > > > > > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do > > > not > > > > > > > deserve anything else than that. > > > > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of > > > > > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless > > > > > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group. > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional > > > > > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan. > > > "A > > > > > loose > > > > > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations > > > posited > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in > > > > > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to > > > reflect > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement." > > > > > > > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization. > > > > > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good & > > > the > > > > > bad. > > > > > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why > > > do > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such > > > political > > > > > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It > > > > > > > > > is > > > the > > > > > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot > > > not > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > blamed for that. > > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe > > > > > giving > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage > > > > > > > > > > point?! > > > > > > > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will > > > never > > > > > > > > > become multipolar system. > > > > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | eHow.comhttp:// > > > > > > >www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have > > > > > shown > > > > > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding > > > links.) > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree > > > > > > > that > > > you > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post > > > implies > > > > > > > duality > > > > > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > illusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics > > > as > > > > > well > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING > > > > > anything > > > > > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye > > > > > space as > > > > > > > far > > > > > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is > > > competitive > > > > > and > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not > > > an > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and > > > persevering. > > > > > > > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. > > > > > > > > > > > My > > > > > > > objection > > > > > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite > > > > > layers, > > > > > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar > > > system. > > > > > So, > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of > > > layers > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually boil down > > > to a > > > > > > > bipolar > > > > > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are > > > part > > > > > of > > > > > > > organised > > > > > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, > > > Minds-Eye > > > > > space > > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be > > > > > infinite, > > > > > > > in this > > > > > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get > > > > > > > challenged... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - > > > Last > > > > > > > post: Mar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and > > > in > > > > > each > > > > > > > layer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > no > > > > > end > > > > > > > as the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > past is ... > > > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8. > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > hearing > > > > > > > a lot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I > > > > > expounded my > > > > > > > belief I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted > > > text > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > ( > > > > > > ) > > > > > > I_D Allan > > > > > > > Be Paranoid. > > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!! > > > > > -- > > > > \--/ Peace > > ... > > Erfahren Sie mehr ยป -- \--/ Peace -- \--/ Peace
