Time is a sense of elapsing , as something which precedes and something which follows that which we are experiencing at the moment. A universe that precedes and that which follows a present universe and the one to which it is experienced is in a parallel universe.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:02 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I have found it valuable to consider the concept and experience of time > from two different perspectives. These two perspectives are linear time and > durational time. Linear time is conventional clock time with there existing > a felt sense of past time, present here and now time, and future time. > > Durational time is equivalent to vacation, and childhood time experienced > as timelessness. > > These two senses of time sometimes coincide as in the experience of lucid > dreaming, and in experiences such as that of Proust in Remembrances of Time > Past. Here both circles of time overlap. > > My personal sense is that there is in fact no time. As human beings we fill > perceived emptiness with meanings. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, Jul 20, 2010 6:42 am > Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes > > i thought of continuing in the same thread becoz it seems connected to > it...what are your ideas about time..i mean your experience of it...when i > htought about it , i felt.. well i'll explain it this way.. its as though i > am standing in a river.. facing the current..and the water just flows flows > beneath me.. and i am rooted to the same spot...this making of time.. or > objectifying it.. it distorts a lot doesnt it...i mean when you say there is > not enuf time.. how can that be...we have all the Time we need...my thoughts > are confused and unclear..but i'd like you all to say something... > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM, pol.science kid <[email protected]>wrote: > >> wow..that was an argument over the 'eye'.. so why dont they use the color >> wheel? how do you know its plastic..;-) >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:56 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, shades of mind is good. Better than this monochrome blue plastic >>> eye, like I said: >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye/browse_frm/thread/b34c37072ddda478/85e1846e157e3bdf?lnk=gst&q=goethe+#85e1846e157e3bdf >>> >>> On 19 Jul., 17:45, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Perhaps as in moderators can be shady at times? :P Shades of mind is >>> > an interesting concept though! >>> > >>> > On Jul 19, 1:03 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > shades?.. really?... in what sense...you mean shades of mind..? i >>> didnt >>> > > really give it an actual thought except for taking it at face >>> > > value;-)..becoz i found it interesting..you can illuminate it for >>> me.. >>> > >>> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > now that I hear you saying it, it could somehow be related to shade >>> > > > concept, what do you sense? >>> > >>> > > > On 18 Jul., 09:19, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > a differing shame concept........wow.... >>> > >>> > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > > A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? >>> Also I >>> > > > > > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted the >>> blog >>> > > > > > link in the given context as a reference to find further >>> information/ >>> > > > > > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas I've >>> > > > > > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as >>> part of a >>> > > > > > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept. >>> > >>> > > > > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right >>> about your >>> > > > > > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here that >>> most >>> > > > people >>> > > > > > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you >>> are >>> > > > doing is >>> > > > > > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you said >>> about >>> > > > the >>> > > > > > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those >>> you >>> > > > listed. >>> > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know >>> it >>> > > > everything >>> > > > > > > already. >>> > > > > > > Allan >>> > >>> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem >>> with links >>> > > > > > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to >>> direct folks >>> > > > to >>> > > > > > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally >>> considered >>> > > > shameless >>> > > > > > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise >>> like >>> > > > links >>> > > > > > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self >>> promotion etc. >>> > > > > > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist >>> education >>> > > > > > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group >>> seems to be >>> > > > a >>> > > > > > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no >>> > > > common-sense >>> > > > > > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will >>> quote a >>> > > > > > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" >>> (May >>> > > > 18, >>> > > > > > > > 2010) : >>> > > > > > > > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means >>> nothing, in >>> > > > the >>> > > > > > > > course of a discussion. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of >>> a >>> > > > > > > > conversation. >>> > > > > > > > You only put across yourself, what you know and have to >>> say, in >>> > > > > > > > terms >>> > > > > > > > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak >>> for >>> > > > > > > > everyone >>> > > > > > > > here. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to >>> your >>> > > > > > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency >>> which is >>> > > > > > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start >>> with >>> > > > alphabet >>> > > > > > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like >>> you do >>> > > > not >>> > > > > > > > deserve anything else than that. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned >>> comment of >>> > > > > > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the >>> meaningless >>> > > > > > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > > > wrote:> >>> > > > > > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 >>> dimensional >>> > > > > > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by >>> Kaplan. >>> > > > "A >>> > > > > > loose >>> > > > > > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international >>> relations >>> > > > posited >>> > > > > > by >>> > > > > > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and >>> Process in >>> > > > > > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant >>> to >>> > > > reflect >>> > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical >>> arrangement." >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of >>> civilization. >>> > > > > > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the >>> good & >>> > > > the >>> > > > > > bad. >>> > > > > > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. >>> Then why >>> > > > do >>> > > > > > such >>> > > > > > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system >>> appear to be >>> > > > > > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such >>> > > > political >>> > > > > > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to >>> be. It is >>> > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model >>> cannot >>> > > > not >>> > > > > > be >>> > > > > > > > > > blamed for that. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D >>> universe >>> > > > > > giving >>> > > > > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage >>> point?! >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system >>> will >>> > > > never >>> > > > > > > > > > become multipolar system. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | >>> eHow.comhttp:// >>> > > > > > > > >>> www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. >>> (You have >>> > > > > > shown >>> > > > > > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines >>> regarding >>> > > > links.) >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight < >>> > > > [email protected]> >>> > > > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would >>> agree that >>> > > > you >>> > > > > > are >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your >>> post >>> > > > implies >>> > > > > > > > duality >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality >>> is but an >>> > > > > > > > illusion. >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum >>> physics >>> > > > as >>> > > > > > well >>> > > > > > > > as >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of >>> PROVING >>> > > > > > anything >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in >>> Minds-Eye >>> > > > > > space as >>> > > > > > > > far >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is >>> > > > competitive >>> > > > > > and >>> > > > > > > > will >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose >>> is not >>> > > > an >>> > > > > > issue. >>> > > > > > > > The >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and >>> > > > persevering. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my >>> post. My >>> > > > > > > > objection >>> > > > > > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of >>> infinite >>> > > > > > layers, >>> > > > > > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from >>> bipolar >>> > > > system. >>> > > > > > So, >>> > > > > > > > now >>> > > > > > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite >>> number of >>> > > > layers >>> > > > > > on >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of >>> Minds-Eye... >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually >>> boil down >>> > > > to a >>> > > > > > > > bipolar >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or >>> you are >>> > > > part >>> > > > > > of >>> > > > > > > > organised >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, >>> > > > Minds-Eye >>> > > > > > space >>> > > > > > > > cannot >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves >>> to be >>> > > > > > infinite, >>> > > > > > > > in this >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will >>> always get >>> > > > > > > > challenged... >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 >>> authors - >>> > > > Last >>> > > > > > > > post: Mar >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite >>> layers and >>> > > > in >>> > > > > > each >>> > > > > > > > layer >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no >>> beginning and >>> > > > no >>> > > > > > end >>> > > > > > > > as the >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > past is ... >>> > >>> > > > >>> http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8. >>> > > > > > .. >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as >>> above. I am >>> > > > > > hearing >>> > > > > > > > a lot >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas >>> when I >>> > > > > > expounded my >>> > > > > > > > belief I >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide >>> quoted >>> > > > text >>> > > > > > - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- >>> > > > > > > ( >>> > > > > > > ) >>> > > > > > > I_D Allan >>> > >>> > > > > > > Be Paranoid. >>> > > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!! >>> > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > \--/ Peace >>> > >>> > ... >>> > >>> > Erfahren Sie mehr ยป >> >> >> >> >> -- >> \--/ Peace >> > > > > -- > \--/ Peace >
