Thank you Pat, currenntly my work only involves review and anaysis of other works. the most complete and relevant thesis to date being that of Robert Kenny's. I have yet to posit anything close to a hpothesis of my own. More research into the quantum vacum and zero point field and understanding quantum waves is of great necessity. Just to clarify the latter to an adequate level of simplicity which is in support of you work; "The ZPF implies that all matter in the universe is “interconnected by waves…, tying one part of the universe to every other part.”-Kenny. In addition, all matter, at sub atomic levels, can be thought of as waves as demonstrated by the two slit experiment (provided that you don't add an observer!). Interesting that the two slit experiment implies consciousness at sub atomic levels!
On Aug 10, 8:56 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 Aug, 13:27, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have been mulling your statement over, DWB, and still can't quite > > understand what you are getting at when you say "by thought no local > > affects can > > occur." Can you explain further? > > He's talking about quantum 'non-locality', non-locality is a direct > influence of one object on another distant object. The same concept > that underpins 'quantum entanglement', a problem that my physics > solves. With respect to DWB, my theory would also account for that, > as I view each of our consciousnesses as 2-D slices of a larger 3-D > loaf of consciousness. Thoses 'slices' are, in essence' as illusory > as the separation between quanta, once consciousness has been bent > around a few dimensional corners. In just the same way as our > experience of 'oneness' is, in THIS 4-D universe, observed as 'the > many', consciousness is just another aspect of that Oneness and CANNOT > truly be separated from ANY other part of the real x-dimensional > universe (where x is 10, 11 or 26, given various string theories). > > DWB, you're spot on and my own work would back yours, here, I > believe!! > > > > > On Aug 9, 11:47 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In reading some of this, the thought occurs that we might be able to > > > effect change in others. I combination with my reseach into collective > > > consciouness it seems feasable that by thought no local affects can > > > occur. > > > > On Aug 9, 9:39 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There is a cellular biologist, Bruce Lipton, that is tenured at the > > > > University of Wisconsin, Madison, and has been studying the effects of > > > > thoughts and our internal environment on our DNA for a couple of > > > > decades. He has hooked himself into the Louise Hay circuit, and my > > > > opinion is that this may damage his credibility although I know that > > > > he did it to get this info to as many people as quickly as possible. > > > > His studies of identical twins separated at birth and raised with > > > > different families show that the DNA of each resembles the DNA of > > > > their families (not biological) more than each other or their family > > > > of origin. > > > > > His thesis is: "It shows that genes and DNA do not control our > > > > biology; that instead DNA is controlled by signals from outside the > > > > cell, including the energetic messages emanating from our positive and > > > > negative thoughts. Dr. Lipton’s profoundly hopeful synthesis of the > > > > latest and best research in cell biology and quantum physics is being > > > > hailed as a major breakthrough showing that our bodies can be changed > > > > as we retrain our thinking." > > > > http://www.brucelipton.com/interviews-with-bruce/ > > > > > I think his work comes the closest that I have seen to making sense of > > > > the real workings of DNA and our evolutionary process. Here in middle > > > > age, as I look around me at the people I have seen live long enough to > > > > make it here, I can see that the careless, angry people look very old, > > > > the pleasant loving people look incredibly young for their age. Our > > > > internal environments - beliefs, thoughts, feelings, emotions, ego > > > > patterns, sleep patterns - have a profound effect on our biologic > > > > function. Sometimes, just recognizing this can create a huge shift in > > > > our health. > > > > > On Aug 9, 8:45 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 5 Aug, 15:27, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have to agree that evolution is not neccesarily an enlightening > > > > > > though. As Deane points out, the survival of the species is the > > > > > > reason > > > > > > for adaptation. I think that awareness can promote evolution of the > > > > > > mind but somehow evolution may be involuntary and we might not be > > > > > > aware of it. > > > > > > This gets Rumsfeldian. There are both recombination and mutation that > > > > > are 'known knowns' and the aspect of epigenetic mutations are a 'known > > > > > unknown', in that we know ABOUT epigenetics and that they can be > > > > > tweaked by reactions to our environment, but we DON'T know exactly how > > > > > they get tweaked or how (exactly) they are coded or how (exactly) they > > > > > are triggered or how they are passed on. So there are elements of > > > > > 'unknown knowns' (all those 'hows' above) and the ever-popular > > > > > 'unknown unknowns', of which only Don himself can speak. ;-) > > > > > > >Nature somehow provides for our needs and 'knows' in > > > > > > which direction we need to evolve. I'm starting to get on my Gaia > > > > > > thing again. LOL! > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 9:48 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey Doug, > > > > > > > > That's a good point and one I did not think of. I can't help but > > > > > > > think though if such a state can be said to be evolution. > > > > > > > > If it contiunes this way, people wil form groups of which they > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > communicate with and groups of which they will keep away from(and > > > > > > > yes > > > > > > > this is the very way I approach life myself) then I can see the > > > > > > > inevitable result would be commuinties divided by mindset and > > > > > > > ideology, rather than geography. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if you have ever heard me wax lyrical about what I > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > will be the way humanity goes, my ideas on tribalizastion and > > > > > > > anarchy? > > > > > > > > This ties in nicely with it though. Still dived commuinites > > > > > > > eascpecialy divison along idelogical grounds is bound to bring > > > > > > > with it > > > > > > > much trouble unless we can agree on certian priniples, free travel > > > > > > > between comminties so that people who have idealogical changes are > > > > > > > free and unencombered to leave and join other communities is the > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > first, and the idea of 'leave them to it' is the second. > > > > > > > > I wouldn't call it evolution without these two principles being > > > > > > > agreed > > > > > > > and acted upon though, I would call it same old same old. > > > > > > > > On 5 Aug, 14:28, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would imagine that anyone might 'evolve' to any degree on the > > > > > > > > spectrum either way. I do agree with Molly's post to the extent > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > as knowledge and awareness increase so does understanding and > > > > > > > > empathy. > > > > > > > > Yes it is true that people are more aprehensive and tend to > > > > > > > > keep to > > > > > > > > thier own but that's understandable. This aprehensiveness comes > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > the awareness of negative aspects in society. This is not to > > > > > > > > say that > > > > > > > > people are not forming better relationship but rather, are more > > > > > > > > selective about the relationships that are persued. Becoming > > > > > > > > close to > > > > > > > > those who live nearby can be dangerous these days. I spoke with > > > > > > > > an old > > > > > > > > friend last week who used to live across the street fom me. A > > > > > > > > mutual > > > > > > > > aquaintance lives next door to her and had been coming to her > > > > > > > > house > > > > > > > > and talking to her boyfriend. She was a little nervous about his > > > > > > > > presence at times but brushed it aside. Apparently the guy was > > > > > > > > coming > > > > > > > > over at night when her BF was at work borrowing DVD's and she > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > not let him in but he would come in during the day when her BF > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > home. One night, she said, she woke up and the guy was in her > > > > > > > > bedroom > > > > > > > > going through her dresser drawer. Her BF happened to be off this > > > > > > > > evening and the left real quick saying he just returning the > > > > > > > > DVD he > > > > > > > > had borrowed. The BF went after him and was going to kick his > > > > > > > > ass but > > > > > > > > she stopped him from doing so. > > > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 8:22 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 5 Aug, 11:26, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think I disagree. > > > > > > > > > > > In my little part of the world it seems that people are > > > > > > > > > > haveing less > > > > > > > > > > to do with each other, I barely know my neigbours, we are > > > > > > > > > > still > > > > > > > > > > fighting in Afganistan and Iraq, religious fundematlisim > > > > > > > > > > may be on the > > > > > > > > > > rise. > > > > > > > > > > > No I see little evidance of any evolution of relationships, > > > > > > > > > > and see > > > > > > > > > > some for the opposite. > > > > > > > > > > Could not the concept of 'evolution' be movement in either a > > > > > > > > > positive > > > > > > > > > or negative direction? And your experience is simply > > > > > > > > > evolution in a > > > > > > > > > negative direction. Remember: it's a spectrum!! > > > > > > > > > > > On 3 Aug, 13:46, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > All aspects of human civilization—language, art, > > > > > > > > > > > aesthetics, > > > > > > > > > > > technology, architecture, organizations, > > > > > > > > > > > governments—depend upon > > > > > > > > > > > essential human relationships for their evolution and > > > > > > > > > > > expression. > > > > > > > > > > > > * Question: What is actually evolving? > > > > > > > > > > > > * Answer: The quality and quantity of relationships > > > > > > > > > > > between people, > > > > > > > > > > > assuming the form of shared meanings, agreements, > > > > > > > > > > > relationships and > > > > > > > > > > > groups of relationships. The cultural domain is > > > > > > > > > > > inter-subjective, > > > > > > > > > > > because it exists between subjects, yet is often not > > > > > > > > > > > objectively > > > > > > > > > > > identifiable. But the fact that these shared spaces of > > > > > > > > > > > meaning are not > > > > > > > > > > > objectively identifiable does not hinder us from > > > > > > > > > > > experiencing them as > > > > > > > > > > > being real. As such, the subjective world includes not > > > > > > > > > > > only individual > > > > > > > > > > > consciousness but the inter-subjective domain of > > > > > > > > > > > relationships as > > > > > > > > > > > well, making the interior universe much more substantial. > > > > > > > > > > > These > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
