Ask yourself this :  The more you know the more makes you stable?

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:

>  A butchered thoughtstream: 'Expression of anger' is a very general
> statement, to be honest I think I immediately recognized (knew) the truth of
> this, but hadn't understood (connections between belief and knowledge) or
> believed (held fully). It took me three hours staring at your post to see
> that I can do more than say I agree, but I believe and know it to be true
> and I have an inkling as to why. All that time was spent going through the
> oppositions. It seems my pragmatic theory of truth has fallen to the lower,
> but that is a matter of seeking greater ends anyway.
>
> It seems my instinct was right, when you say anger I keep thinking mania,
> and Wordnet calls it an 'affective disorder' (emotional). The only way out
> of cycle of degenerating trauma/damage is the same path that builds
> temperance to guided passions, however to build that from anger is going in
> the opposite direction and takes triggers and recognition to build and
> support temperance. Perhaps the path we would not take if not provided the
> challenge (journey or destination). It takes overcoming the struggle enough
> to realize new levels of consciousness and accepting the responsibility to
> apply it. I'm still puzzling over whether this is for the inner or the outer
> (ourselves/others), damn I keep forgetting the false dichotomy in that:
> outer perceptual lens of the inner urging and pushing us forward and
> toward/as one.
>
> The Serenity Prayer has a new meaning for me tonight. Another door has
> opened. You know there is a lot left unsaid in these posts of yours.
>
>
> On 9/8/2010 4:18 PM, Molly wrote:
>
>> got it.  My point is, we are blowing, and the wind...no
>> difference...but do understand that this is not a level of
>> consciousness for an expression of anger, which would be a view of
>> separation, so true.  In which case...I wouldn't want any of that
>> coming back to me.  I often wonder if the person acting out anger is
>> even aware of what comes back.
>>
>> On Sep 8, 3:18 pm, ashok tewari<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>> * smiling *  The point, Molly, was it coming back on oneself. * tickled *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Molly<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see your point, Vam.  I didn't think the act made that much
>>>> difference, but I suppose it could!
>>>> On Sep 8, 2:43 pm, ashok tewari<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> " ... blowing in the wind."
>>>>> I suggest : ... spitting in th wind, for females. And : ... pissing in
>>>>>
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>> wind, for males !
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Molly<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is interesting, in this thread, so many have taken the task to tell
>>>>>> others how to express themselves.  I have not found any problems with
>>>>>> RPs posts (indeed, a great deal of understanding of the subject), and
>>>>>> like gabby, don't think anyone should have to defend him, is there a
>>>>>> gang forming here?  Some of us make our sufi like responses, others
>>>>>> make statements reflecting our views and give links with info to back
>>>>>> them up.  None of this is new and none of it is the basis for
>>>>>> opposition.  We are all free to express our views in any post within
>>>>>> the parameters of the guidelines, and all free to choose not to post.
>>>>>> But unless a moderator steps in with a reminder of the guidelines,
>>>>>> anyone telling another what to say and how to act in here is just
>>>>>> blowing in the wind.
>>>>>> In terms of the thread, these may be the very thoughts that plague our
>>>>>> minds obsessively that we would be better off releasing than indulging
>>>>>> in reaction.  Thoughts about how the world comes up short, is
>>>>>> disappointing, how others should be are all malignant ego, and if
>>>>>> released, leave room within us for honest self examination.  Levels of
>>>>>> consciousness filled with thoughts of fear, anger, resentment etc
>>>>>> multiply these thoughts exponentially and uncontrollably until our
>>>>>> minds cannot turn off from them.  Levels of consciousness filled with
>>>>>> peace and quiet, compassion, love and gratitude allow us to better
>>>>>> witness the process of thought and mind in consciousness.  This kind
>>>>>> of self examination cannot occur in the first mentioned level, and
>>>>>> will inevitably occur in the second.  Truth is, even the mystics will
>>>>>> admit that it is human to move from state to state, and many suggest a
>>>>>> spiral dynamic to the movement.
>>>>>> On Sep 8, 12:05 pm, gabbydott<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems my vegetarian humor differs quite a bit from yours, Allan. ;-)
>>>>>>> See what I was going to reply to Darkwater:
>>>>>>> I don't know why you are doing this, but I think RP can speak for
>>>>>>> himself. Or shall I say: Let him speak for himself!? Watering down
>>>>>>> everything to Ken Wilbur does not help to build the arc in time. He
>>>>>>> says, his words are meant for people who want to understand them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fair
>>>>
>>>>>  enough. Take what you get and leave the rest behind is my advice to
>>>>>>> you, Darkwater.
>>>>>>> On 8 Sep., 17:16, iam deheretic<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL  Oddly I know exactly what he is saying from different sources.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it
>>>>
>>>>> has
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been rumbling around fo eons,, does not make it true and because
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> some
>>>>
>>>>> people
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> make something dogma and doctrine  of their beliefs still does not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> make
>>>>
>>>>> it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> true. Some things are interesting to look at but then  you let them
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> go.
>>>>
>>>>> To
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> me far to many beliefs are based promoted and twisted by people to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> meat
>>>>
>>>>>  their own needs.
>>>>>>>> Allan
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, DarkwaterBlight<
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Oddly, I understand much of what RP is trying to express but it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>
>>>>>   only on account of my relentless research into the subject of the
>>>>>>>>> thread. Culturaly, here in the west, it is not generaly
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> understood
>>>>
>>>>>   that there are two truths, relative and ultimate. Relative truth
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>
>>>>>   be described by means of science and assetions can be made that
>>>>>>>>> something is true or false under the conditions assigned.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, RP
>>>>
>>>>>   speaks of ultimate truth and non dual spirit and in doing so,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> enters
>>>>
>>>>>   into the realm of contradiction as the ultimate is empty of
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> qualities
>>>>
>>>>>   and categorizations. Ken Wilbur describes this as "The Two Truths
>>>>>>>>> Doctrine"
>>>>>>>>> http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/kosmos/excerptG/part1.cfm
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 8, 5:04 am, iam deheretic<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Words hold so much truth and what we say is but the reflection
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> who we
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  are
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM, RP Singh<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    My words are meant for people who want to understand them ,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  others
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> of your ilk they are just ramblings of a madman and so
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this leaves me laughing and gives a smile
>>>>>>>>>> I learned a long time ago from Kipling and others  to even
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> listen
>>>>
>>>>> to the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  dull and ignorant for they to have their stories.
>>>>>>>>>> Allan
>>>>>>>>>> Gruff , I ask you again to be happy as I did the last time when
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>
>>>>>   clashed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with me.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM, gruff<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   "... On Sep 7, 9:33 pm, RP Singh<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ..."
>>>>
>>>>>     By using words like  ' I believe'  etc. doesn't make one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 's
>>>>
>>>>> words
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  less
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  arrogant. It is the content which matters. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> made up
>>>>
>>>>> your
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  mind
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find fault in me you will continue to do so on one pretext
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  other.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder and so does all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> else.
>>>>
>>>>>    It is hoped that by use of such phrases over time a true
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> respect
>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   others will develop in other dimensions of your being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your
>>>>
>>>>> words do
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   not show any such respect for anyone elses words but your
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> own
>>>>
>>>>> which
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   you seem to hold in the highest esteem.  Your words almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> demand some
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   form of worship just for you having said them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>  (
>>>>>>>>>>   )
>>>>>>>>>> I_D Allan
>>>>>>>>>> Be Paranoid.
>>>>>>>>>> God is always building a better idiot!!!- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>  (
>>>>>>>>   )
>>>>>>>> I_D Allan
>>>>>>>> Be Paranoid.
>>>>>>>> God is always building a better idiot!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>> ASHOK TEWARI
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> ASHOK TEWARI
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to