I understand the
On Jan 23, 5:33 pm, restless <[email protected]> wrote: > The part of making the person everyones bitch is agreeable to me but > from what I have seen they dont really get long sentences, the > punishment doesnt fit the crime. I would not go after the person right > away time would elapse and the death would be seen as an accident, > > On Jan 20, 10:57 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Rape and murder a child, oh my dear Lisa Hunt them down and kill them.that > > would only land you in prison, seems to me it would be much more satisfying > > knowing that prisons and the people confined within tend to despise > > pedophiles and cild killers, if they are protectedby the prison they tend > > to be raped and beaten with none of the benefits of being a boy toy. > > your child raper would be praying for a quick and merciful death and just > > who he is would travel from prison. Actually killing him would be a merciful > > death. > > Why go to prison? Especially if it is vengeance you want? > > Allan > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:58 PM, restless <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Man is corruptible, one may start out killing for the benefit of all > > > but what generally happens is we become judge and jury. The real > > > question is who am I that I can decide what is good for society or for > > > the benefit of all. Everything happens for a reason is my belief even > > > tho we may not in a million years understand why things happen as they > > > do. I believe we are all interconnected and that we all have a destiny > > > we must fulfill even a mundane life has purpose. But would I seek out > > > and kill someone who raped and murdered my child rather than seek > > > conventional justice, yes, yes I would. > > > > On Jan 20, 5:56 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You know, there was a way to deal with feeble or not right births- > > > > they would just put the babies aside to slowly die. Plus all those > > > > myths about babies left in the mountains or with shepherds to later > > > > return and claim their kingdoms, etc. It is such a vulnerable time for > > > > mother and child- to make it through seems a miracle when there is no > > > > support. Amen. > > > > > On Jan 19, 11:34 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Rigsy > > > > > > I'll try to answer all of those questions. > > > > > > Abortion, fine I'm pro choice a fetues has no capability to make > > > > > choices. > > > > > > War of any kind bar defense from invasion I totaly abhour. > > > > > > Droping bombs or snding in drones does not relieve responsibility. > > > > > > Torture does not sit to well with me, but that is a seperate moral > > > > > issue then death and choice. > > > > > > Vigilanty justice may be fine as long as such justice does not include > > > > > killing. > > > > > > Animals, well we eat them and indeed they eat each other, so that is > > > > > fine. > > > > > > Toxic weapons comes under warcraft and so in line with the song I find > > > > > it 'stupid'. > > > > > > On Jan 19, 1:07 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Then how to you feel about abortion or the military/politicians or > > > > > > suicide bombers killing others including the innocent? Does dropping > > > > > > bombs from an airplane or sending in drones via satellite relieve > > > > > > responsibilty? There are moral arguments and laws regarding a "just > > > > > > war" and self-defense. (St. Augustine, I believe.) What about > > > > > > torture > > > > > > or vigilante justice? What about animals, for that matter? Maybe it > > > is > > > > > > covered in miltary classes- kill/ratios. What about the long term > > > > > > effects of toxic weapons (products) upon people, land and water? > > > > > > Evidently history has usurped God's control of life and death. > > > > > > > On Jan 19, 5:31 am, "[email protected]" < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ohhh no no no no not at all. > > > > > > > > Let us look at ome words and I realise tha English is not wizards > > > > > > > first language so perhaps this may help him out. > > > > > > > > Murder can be defined as the unlawfull killing of a human being by > > > > > > > other human beings. > > > > > > > > So state sacntioned 'murder' must be unlawfull. > > > > > > > > However that said let us carry on with the intent of Wizards post. > > > > > > > > There are no people who deserve to die to my mind. > > > > > > > > I am of course religous,but I do not belive that only God has teh > > > > > > > right to kill. Darwin shows us that death is part of the strugle > > > to > > > > > > > live. No I belive that by killing a man you take all chocie from > > > him, > > > > > > > this is a big moral no no in my book. > > > > > > > > On Jan 19, 3:46 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think the State alone should have the right to murder people , > > > it > > > > > > > > prosecutes whom it thinks is a menace to society and if the > > > > > > > > judge > > > > > > > > thinks that it would be better in the interests of justice that > > > he > > > > > > > > should be " murdered " he passes the death sentence on him. > > > Terrorists > > > > > > > > also murder people and individuals also murder their enemies > > > > > > > > etc. > > > or > > > > > > > > murder for profit , but I think that is all wrong and cannot be > > > > > > > > justified. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, wizard_47_cpp < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Recently i was thinking about murder. I was wondering if this, > > > > > > > > > sometimes, could be the best solution to many important > > > problems (i > > > > > > > > > obvious exclude personal and economical ones). There are some > > > people > > > > > > > > > who we think should die, because they damage the society, the > > > world > > > > > > > > > and other people. So, do we have the right to kill this > > > individuals? > > > > > > > > > I'm some kind of atheist (exaclty i don't believe in an > > > antropomorphic > > > > > > > > > god, endowed with an human-like will), so i don't think, like > > > > > > > > > somebody, only god has the right to kill humans. > > > > > > > > > My thought is we have this right, but it needs valid > > > motivations. > > > > > > > > > But now the questions are: does valid motivations really > > > > > > > > > exist? > > > can > > > > > > > > > human understand wich are them? > > > > > > > > > The topic can become wider with the last one, it implicates > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > understanding of an absolute truth. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for my english- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > ( > > ) > > I_D Allan > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
