On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:33 AM, restless <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The part of making the person everyones bitch is agreeable to me but
from what I have seen they dont really get long sentences, the
punishment doesnt fit the crime.
hmm
I would not go after the person right
away time would elapse and the death would be seen as an accident,
Don't under estimate the police. I remember one murder case just a
piece of thread and a button, before long we had had the killer.
Allan
On Jan 20, 10:57 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Rape and murder a child, oh my dear Lisa Hunt them down and kill
them.that
> would only land you in prison, seems to me it would be much more
satisfying
> knowing that prisons and the people confined within tend to despise
> pedophiles and cild killers, if they are protectedby the prison
they tend
> to be raped and beaten with none of the benefits of being a boy toy.
> your child raper would be praying for a quick and merciful death
and just
> who he is would travel from prison. Actually killing him would
be a merciful
> death.
> Why go to prison? Especially if it is vengeance you want?
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:58 PM, restless <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > Man is corruptible, one may start out killing for the benefit
of all
> > but what generally happens is we become judge and jury. The real
> > question is who am I that I can decide what is good for
society or for
> > the benefit of all. Everything happens for a reason is my
belief even
> > tho we may not in a million years understand why things happen
as they
> > do. I believe we are all interconnected and that we all have a
destiny
> > we must fulfill even a mundane life has purpose. But would I
seek out
> > and kill someone who raped and murdered my child rather than seek
> > conventional justice, yes, yes I would.
>
> > On Jan 20, 5:56 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > You know, there was a way to deal with feeble or not right
births-
> > > they would just put the babies aside to slowly die. Plus all
those
> > > myths about babies left in the mountains or with shepherds
to later
> > > return and claim their kingdoms, etc. It is such a
vulnerable time for
> > > mother and child- to make it through seems a miracle when
there is no
> > > support. Amen.
>
> > > On Jan 19, 11:34 am, "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
>
> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > > Hey Rigsy
>
> > > > I'll try to answer all of those questions.
>
> > > > Abortion, fine I'm pro choice a fetues has no capability
to make
> > > > choices.
>
> > > > War of any kind bar defense from invasion I totaly abhour.
>
> > > > Droping bombs or snding in drones does not relieve
responsibility.
>
> > > > Torture does not sit to well with me, but that is a
seperate moral
> > > > issue then death and choice.
>
> > > > Vigilanty justice may be fine as long as such justice does
not include
> > > > killing.
>
> > > > Animals, well we eat them and indeed they eat each other,
so that is
> > > > fine.
>
> > > > Toxic weapons comes under warcraft and so in line with the
song I find
> > > > it 'stupid'.
>
> > > > On Jan 19, 1:07 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > > > > Then how to you feel about abortion or the
military/politicians or
> > > > > suicide bombers killing others including the innocent?
Does dropping
> > > > > bombs from an airplane or sending in drones via
satellite relieve
> > > > > responsibilty? There are moral arguments and laws
regarding a "just
> > > > > war" and self-defense. (St. Augustine, I believe.) What
about torture
> > > > > or vigilante justice? What about animals, for that
matter? Maybe it
> > is
> > > > > covered in miltary classes- kill/ratios. What about the
long term
> > > > > effects of toxic weapons (products) upon people, land
and water?
> > > > > Evidently history has usurped God's control of life and
death.
>
> > > > > On Jan 19, 5:31 am, "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>" <
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Ohhh no no no no not at all.
>
> > > > > > Let us look at ome words and I realise tha English is
not wizards
> > > > > > first language so perhaps this may help him out.
>
> > > > > > Murder can be defined as the unlawfull killing of a
human being by
> > > > > > other human beings.
>
> > > > > > So state sacntioned 'murder' must be unlawfull.
>
> > > > > > However that said let us carry on with the intent of
Wizards post.
>
> > > > > > There are no people who deserve to die to my mind.
>
> > > > > > I am of course religous,but I do not belive that only
God has teh
> > > > > > right to kill. Darwin shows us that death is part of
the strugle
> > to
> > > > > > live. No I belive that by killing a man you take all
chocie from
> > him,
> > > > > > this is a big moral no no in my book.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 19, 3:46 am, RP Singh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I think the State alone should have the right to
murder people ,
> > it
> > > > > > > prosecutes whom it thinks is a menace to society and
if the judge
> > > > > > > thinks that it would be better in the interests of
justice that
> > he
> > > > > > > should be " murdered " he passes the death sentence
on him.
> > Terrorists
> > > > > > > also murder people and individuals also murder their
enemies etc.
> > or
> > > > > > > murder for profit , but I think that is all wrong
and cannot be
> > > > > > > justified.
>
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, wizard_47_cpp <
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Recently i was thinking about murder. I was
wondering if this,
> > > > > > > > sometimes, could be the best solution to many
important
> > problems (i
> > > > > > > > obvious exclude personal and economical ones).
There are some
> > people
> > > > > > > > who we think should die, because they damage the
society, the
> > world
> > > > > > > > and other people. So, do we have the right to kill
this
> > individuals?
> > > > > > > > I'm some kind of atheist (exaclty i don't believe
in an
> > antropomorphic
> > > > > > > > god, endowed with an human-like will), so i don't
think, like
> > > > > > > > somebody, only god has the right to kill humans.
> > > > > > > > My thought is we have this right, but it needs valid
> > motivations.
> > > > > > > > But now the questions are: does valid motivations
really exist?
> > can
> > > > > > > > human understand wich are them?
> > > > > > > > The topic can become wider with the last one, it
implicates the
> > > > > > > > understanding of an absolute truth.
>
> > > > > > > > Sorry for my english- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> (
> )
> I_D Allan
>
> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
(
)
I_D Allan
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
