Here I don't use right or wrong in a moral context. What I'm referring to is
the technique used to construct a belief system. IMO a belief system that
has no anchors in the common reality that we experience has a weak
foundation within that reality ( I realize that this is kinda wordy but I
can't think of a better way to put it ). If you use the precepts of that
common reality to assail the belief system then it will crumble under a
reasonably well thought out argument.

Here 'wrong' is used to convey the idea of an erroneous technique in
building a personal belief system.

Of course the argument could be made that this is a subjective viewpoint
based on my own personal belief system. And I'm perfectly willing to accept
that argument if it can replace my rationale with a better one.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:34 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't put any form of morality on the question of God or not God
> myself.
>
> To belive in God is not right or wrong, and to activly believe there
> is no God, or to disbelive in a creative diety is also not right or
> wrong.  They just are.
>
> On Apr 9, 3:22 am, Chuck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 5:18 am, malcymo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I do not believe that a supreme being created the universe etc.
> >
> > The term 'supreme being' is kinda tricky. If supreme is interpreted as
> > all powerful then yes, I agree.
> >
> > I believe that it's possible a superior entity (be that a single
> > organism or an advanced society) might have created the universe using
> > technology millions or possibly billions of years beyond our own.
> >
> > > This week A C Grayling brought out his book "The
> > > Good Book - A secular bible".
> > > In interview he stated that theism is harmful to
> > > individuals and society.
> >
> > The term theism as used here is too generic. I've seen some religious
> > organizations that I believe were truly interested in helping
> > individuals and society. OTOH, I doubt many people would consider Jim
> > Jones and his cult to be a good thing.
> >
> > Personally, I think that all worldviews should be based in a rational
> > belief system. It's fine to believe in a god as long as you have a
> > logical rationalization for your belief.
> >
> > Unfortunately for many people the need to believe in an afterlife
> > outweighs rational thought.
> >
> > > I would like to hear his argument on this matter.
> > > Why he thinks that theism is harmful.
> > > If he is indeed correct then there is an argument
> > > for the active promotion of atheism.
> > > What say you?
> >
> > IMO atheism is just as wrong as theism. It is an unsubstantiated
> > belief in the absence of a god.
> >
> > If you look at the way the universe is put together I'd say that there
> > were some valid reasons to infer the possibility of intelligent
> > design.
>

Reply via email to