Because we don't say so here. We keep it in the back of our minds.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Chuck Bowling <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Why would that be inappropriate? We all do it - although some may lie about
> it. Changing who we are to fit the social context seems to be the norm.
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:14 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I was just going to say that I tend to zoom in or out or switch roles
>> depending on the situation, but I guess that this might be regarded as
>> inappropriate also, hm.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Chuck Bowling <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> That probably depends on what kind of individual you want to be in a
>>> social situation. I think intoxication just numbs the part of the brain that
>>> provides an etiquette filter in social situations. After a few drinks you
>>> still know in the fore of your mind that staring at a girls boobs is
>>> inappropriate but you just don't give a damn.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:37 PM, the taoist shaman 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> is to forget self  the best way to be an individual ?  if not why then
>>>> does intoxication lube socalization ?
>>>>
>>>> @\ /@
>>>>    "
>>>> VVVVV
>>>> VVVVV
>>>>
>>>> the taoist shaman wrote:
>>>> > this post below -it is almost impossible to be an individual-
>>>> > individuality is essential to ... human life . if there is no
>>>> > individual there can be no unity . u must unite with ones own self in
>>>> > order to be a ''real'' part of  ( unite with) society .    there are
>>>> > thous who fear , and try to silence , individualities , because they
>>>> > themselves are not an individual , and dont want to be left out of the
>>>> > whole . now someone might try and say '' to be too much of an
>>>> > individual will separate a person from the whole ''  i say that person
>>>> > is separated from themselves , because ( like the many ways we all
>>>> > speek of the same basic  religion through differant symbolisms ) our
>>>> > simmalaretys are greater than our differences
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to