Part of the problem is that there are many situational friendships that lack depth so we are not fully engaged with the other.
On May 16, 6:14 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just going to say that I tend to zoom in or out or switch roles > depending on the situation, but I guess that this might be regarded as > inappropriate also, hm. > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Chuck Bowling < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > That probably depends on what kind of individual you want to be in a social > > situation. I think intoxication just numbs the part of the brain that > > provides an etiquette filter in social situations. After a few drinks you > > still know in the fore of your mind that staring at a girls boobs is > > inappropriate but you just don't give a damn. > > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:37 PM, the taoist shaman > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> is to forget self the best way to be an individual ? if not why then > >> does intoxication lube socalization ? > > >> @\ /@ > >> " > >> VVVVV > >> VVVVV > > >> the taoist shaman wrote: > >> > this post below -it is almost impossible to be an individual- > >> > individuality is essential to ... human life . if there is no > >> > individual there can be no unity . u must unite with ones own self in > >> > order to be a ''real'' part of ( unite with) society . there are > >> > thous who fear , and try to silence , individualities , because they > >> > themselves are not an individual , and dont want to be left out of the > >> > whole . now someone might try and say '' to be too much of an > >> > individual will separate a person from the whole '' i say that person > >> > is separated from themselves , because ( like the many ways we all > >> > speek of the same basic religion through differant symbolisms ) our > >> > simmalaretys are greater than our differences- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
