rigsy___ if the nature of your ambitions are all of a good intention , the removal of your inhabitation shouldn't have a foul effect . obviously the problem drinker has problems , which is probably why it is so common .
rigsy03 wrote: > It lowers inhibitions but depends on what kind of drinking you are > talking about- there are varieties. Drinking can also be a form of > self-medication- like drugs- to cope, etc. but since alcohol is also a > depressant some use it simply to tune out and sleep. Where does one > drink? At a biker bar or at home, etc. Some become amorous- others > become surly and violent. Maybe behavior depends on what part of your > nature is inhibited. It also depends on what kind of society you are > in- are highjinks or binges part of a social ritual? > > On May 16, 1:49 am, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > wrote: > > That probably depends on what kind of individual you want to be in a social > > situation. I think intoxication just numbs the part of the brain that > > provides an etiquette filter in social situations. After a few drinks you > > still know in the fore of your mind that staring at a girls boobs is > > inappropriate but you just don't give a damn. > > > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:37 PM, the taoist shaman > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > is to forget self the best way to be an individual ? if not why then > > > does intoxication lube socalization ? > > > > > @\ /@ > > > " > > > VVVVV > > > VVVVV > > > > > the taoist shaman wrote: > > > > this post below -it is almost impossible to be an individual- > > > > individuality is essential to ... human life . if there is no > > > > individual there can be no unity . u must unite with ones own self in > > > > order to be a ''real'' part of ( unite with) society . there are > > > > thous who fear , and try to silence , individualities , because they > > > > themselves are not an individual , and dont want to be left out of the > > > > whole . now someone might try and say '' to be too much of an > > > > individual will separate a person from the whole '' i say that person > > > > is separated from themselves , because ( like the many ways we all > > > > speek of the same basic religion through differant symbolisms ) our > > > > simmalaretys are greater than our differences- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
