There are different behaviors and attitudes for different situations,
nothing for anyone to feel insecure about in that regard. Though I get
the point about some personalities being an inch deep, I've even caught
myself in that state, the feeling is shame I guess..
On 5/16/2011 2:19 PM, gabbydott wrote:
Because we don't say so here. We keep it in the back of our minds.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Chuck Bowling
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Why would that be inappropriate? We all do it - although some may
lie about it. Changing who we are to fit the social context seems
to be the norm.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:14 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I was just going to say that I tend to zoom in or out or
switch roles depending on the situation, but I guess that this
might be regarded as inappropriate also, hm.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Chuck Bowling
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That probably depends on what kind of individual you want
to be in a social situation. I think intoxication just
numbs the part of the brain that provides an etiquette
filter in social situations. After a few drinks you still
know in the fore of your mind that staring at a girls
boobs is inappropriate but you just don't give a damn.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:37 PM, the taoist shaman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
is to forget self the best way to be an individual ?
if not why then
does intoxication lube socalization ?
@\ /@
"
VVVVV
VVVVV
the taoist shaman wrote:
> this post below -it is almost impossible to be an
individual-
> individuality is essential to ... human life . if
there is no
> individual there can be no unity . u must unite with
ones own self in
> order to be a ''real'' part of ( unite with)
society . there are
> thous who fear , and try to silence ,
individualities , because they
> themselves are not an individual , and dont want to
be left out of the
> whole . now someone might try and say '' to be too
much of an
> individual will separate a person from the whole ''
i say that person
> is separated from themselves , because ( like the
many ways we all
> speek of the same basic religion through differant
symbolisms ) our
> simmalaretys are greater than our differences
