Thank you for reminding me of myself! :-) Another angle is that codependents- in a strict sense- can place their hopes in people who are unavailable to give what a healthy relationship needs but wind up feeling like it's their problem- not the other's. Bye, for now.
On May 17, 7:14 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > That's a good explanation, thank you. > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:06 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Part of the problem is that there are many situational friendships > > that lack depth so we are not fully engaged with the other. > > > On May 16, 6:14 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was just going to say that I tend to zoom in or out or switch roles > > > depending on the situation, but I guess that this might be regarded as > > > inappropriate also, hm. > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Chuck Bowling < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > That probably depends on what kind of individual you want to be in a > > social > > > > situation. I think intoxication just numbs the part of the brain that > > > > provides an etiquette filter in social situations. After a few drinks > > you > > > > still know in the fore of your mind that staring at a girls boobs is > > > > inappropriate but you just don't give a damn. > > > > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:37 PM, the taoist shaman < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> is to forget self the best way to be an individual ? if not why then > > > >> does intoxication lube socalization ? > > > > >> @\ /@ > > > >> " > > > >> VVVVV > > > >> VVVVV > > > > >> the taoist shaman wrote: > > > >> > this post below -it is almost impossible to be an individual- > > > >> > individuality is essential to ... human life . if there is no > > > >> > individual there can be no unity . u must unite with ones own self > > in > > > >> > order to be a ''real'' part of ( unite with) society . there are > > > >> > thous who fear , and try to silence , individualities , because they > > > >> > themselves are not an individual , and dont want to be left out of > > the > > > >> > whole . now someone might try and say '' to be too much of an > > > >> > individual will separate a person from the whole '' i say that > > person > > > >> > is separated from themselves , because ( like the many ways we all > > > >> > speek of the same basic religion through differant symbolisms ) our > > > >> > simmalaretys are greater than our differences- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
