Thanks Allan - I'm rather fond of you. Our relationship with future knowledge may be close to that between us and a deity. Super- intelligence may already be around us waiting for us to pass through the singularity to 'machine' intelligence. The machine will probably be biological.
On 29 Nov, 19:45, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > Neil if you were in the position of God.. Would you provide > unlimited knowledge to humanity? You have to look at how knowledge > has been handled till now. the rules are well known ..I think > selfishness is a very dominate trait .. therein lies a problem.. > Are we discarded as a mistake,, no it may seem that way individuals > are not judged by humanity but rather by their own actions and > reactions. > > I think the problem lies in trying to figure out the purpose of life > is and ones relationship with the power greater than oneself and how > you see the situation. Now how you respond to your life is your > drama .. the effect of your drama creates your karma which ultimately > determines your status in the great mandala.. > > What a person believes is actually of little importance.. How you > live your life is.. In my opinion for what it is worth you are an > extremely good soul trapped in a human body. > Allan > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:02 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not sure on souls Allan - what does seem clear is we aren't > > trusted with much knowledge if there is a lot more to know - or could > > not serve existing purpose and 'travel' with that knowledge, or we are > > a discarded mistake. > > > On 26 Nov, 08:47, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are very right there Neil.. the only possible solutions lies in > >> religious beliefs.. that comes down to do souls exist and the > >> origine of souls.. My opinion is well known yet I am still open to > >> ideas. > >> Allan > > >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:45 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > We don't see to have much clue when it comes to bigger pictures Allan. > > >> > On 25 Nov, 09:31, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> maybe humans have this same basic hardwired instinct as the bees for > >> >> looking out the hive of humanity only the age of reason and > >> >> selfishness has over ridden it in most cases.. > >> >> interesting comparison: > >> >> Allan > > >> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:15 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > We have now uncovered a rich repertoire of behaviours under the hive > >> >> > lid. Studies of the choreography of the waggle dance, for instance, > >> >> > have revealed that a worker will interrupt another's jive with a butt > >> >> > to the head if it has found danger - a spider, say - at the location > >> >> > (Current Biology, vol 20, p 310). Bees also display an extraordinary > >> >> > range of housekeeping chores, including spring cleaning, mutual > >> >> > grooming and a form of surveillance in which "bouncers" guard > >> >> > entrances against intruders. The hive has even evolved its own air > >> >> > conditioning; when temperatures soar, the workers sprinkle water over > >> >> > the honeycomb and beat their wings to produce a cooling draft. In > >> >> > total we have now recorded around 60 separate behaviours for worker > >> >> > honeybees, including six different kinds of dance (Current Biology, > >> >> > vol 19, p R995). These achievements seem to overshadow the abilities > >> >> > of many mammals. Rabbits are thought to show about 30 distinct > >> >> > behaviours, and the beaver has about 50 in its busy life felling > >> >> > trees, building damns and storing food. Even the bottlenose dolphin's > >> >> > 120 or so routines are only about twice the number a worker honeybee > >> >> > manages. > > >> >> > Despite this bulging portfolio of behaviours, many zoologists have > >> >> > remained sceptical about apian intelligence, believing they were > >> >> > seeing hard-wired instinct rather than flexible thought. "The brain of > >> >> > a bee is the size of a grass seed and is not made for thinking," said > >> >> > von Frisch in 1962. However, that view is now changing, as Chittka and > >> >> > others discover a surprising mental agility behind the bee's bumbling > >> >> > exterior. Chittka's first revelation came while he was investigating > >> >> > the way honeybees navigate to a flower patch. Varying the number of > >> >> > 3.5-metre-tall tents between a hive and a feeder - "It looked more > >> >> > like an art installation than an experiment" - he found that foragers > >> >> > seemed to count landmarks rather than using the overall distance when > >> >> > working out where to land. Subsequent research has confirmed this > >> >> > numeracy, showing that bees can match the quantity shown in simple > >> >> > pictures of shapes to find a reward. In one trial they were shown > >> >> > three leaves and then had to choose between two and three lemons, for > >> >> > instance - a test they passed with ease. The ability to match signs > >> >> > using different symbols is crucial, showing that the bees did not just > >> >> > rely on a memory of a specific image but understood the underlying > >> >> > number. But this ability is limited: bees can only count to four. > > >> >> > There seems an endless supply of uninteresting people rigsy - I am not > >> >> > sure mice are so discriminating! Old cops would appear a couple of > >> >> > yeas into retirement looking much younger and ask when our (job) > >> >> > sentences were coming to an end. My scientist colleagues nearly all > >> >> > resent not being into enquiry. The experiments with mice involve > >> >> > dicing brains - there are physical changes due to isolation in tissues > >> >> > surrounding neurons. > > >> >> > On 23 Nov, 13:38, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Wolfram Alpha - now there's an example of something not doing what it > >> >> >> said on the tin at the launch! I shall go back. > > >> >> >> They've found a wasp described as having a 'clock work brain'. Seen > >> >> >> most of your finds James - which only shows our interests overlap. > >> >> >> Your take on Deutsch hadn't occurred to me and set my mind spinning. > >> >> >> I'm after a holy grail - something that would be a framework for > >> >> >> rational discussion. Took a sleeping tablet last night because I > >> >> >> couldn't switch off - a problem my laptop is having since W8! It now > >> >> >> boots as rapidly as my first PC from a 5 inch floppy. > > >> >> >> Will get t your links and then walk dog (tail wag as I write this!) > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> let news spin. > > >> >> >> On 23 Nov, 04:48, James <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> > Here's a neat reference to brain development in a tiny wasp which > >> >> >> > undergoes major neural expansion when it leaves the nest, > >> >> >> > dendrites to > >> >> >> > the tune of seven to eight mm long in a brain the size of two > >> >> >> > grains of > >> >> >> > sand. > > >> >> >> > Tiny But Adaptable Wasp Brains Show Ability To Alter Their > >> >> >> > Architecture > >> >> >> > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144738.htm > > >> >> >> > An offshoot for a member here, my father in law mentioned working > >> >> >> > in > >> >> >> > audio biofeedback training \brain wave states with a woman 40 > >> >> >> > years ago > >> >> >> > with successful results using EEG equipment. The tech may be > >> >> >> > available > >> >> >> > in nano-sensor array headsets today (a gaming rig/platform). > > >> >> >> > I'm out of steam tonight, reading about exocortex theories, the > >> >> >> > memex > >> >> >> > and ended up at this fascinating timeline at wolfram alpha! > > >> >> >> >http://www.wolframalpha.com/docs/timeline/computable-knowledge-histor... > > >> >> >> > Be well, happy turkey day, thanks gabby! :) > > >> >> >> > ps. These are pretty neat too, apparently I became fascinated by > >> >> >> > wasp > >> >> >> > neurology a couple months ago. > > >> >> >> > Alien Wasps Abduct, Drop Ants to Get > >> >> >> > Food:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/04/110406-aliens-wasps-a... > > >> >> >> > Wasps Can Recognize Faces - Social species relies on recognition > >> >> >> > to keep > >> >> >> > the peace, study > >> >> >> > suggests.http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/11/111202-wasps-people-f... > > >> >> >> > On 11/20/2012 3:49 PM, archytas wrote: > > >> >> >> > > I would certainly sign up for the brain-machine interface and a > >> >> >> > > bit > >> >> >> > > of splicing with a prawn to see in 16 colours (preferably with > >> >> >> > > an > >> >> >> > > alien who sees the dark). One possibility is that we don't know > >> >> >> > > how > >> >> >> > > to use our brains much - capacity is massive potentially. I > >> >> >> > > rather > >> >> >> > > like the idea that biological intelligence is short-lived and > >> >> >> > > other > >> >> >> > > civilisations have passed through it. Stuff like Skydrive (which > >> >> >> > > sadly are attempts to rent software to us at high prices) could > >> >> >> > > be > >> >> >> > > conceived as a thought-cloud in which individuality as we think > >> >> >> > > of it > >> >> >> > > becomes as redundant as the PC once netware works. We may see a > >> >> >> > > network in which all skills are embodied and means of production > >> >> >> > > available to all. In some parts of science we are thinking the > >> >> >> > > machines are up to a lot we don't understand already. > >> >> >> > > More in my own field - we are finding brain changes associated > >> >> >> > > with > >> >> >> > > social isolation. In mice these changes leave the mice > >> >> >> > > uninterested > >> >> >> > > in new mice (the opposite of normal). The brain is much more > >> >> >> > > plastic > >> >> >> > > than most imagine and humanity is changing. On the familiarity > >> >> >> > > thing > >> >> >> > > James, E = mc2 is actually as slightly larger equation including > >> >> >> > > p > >> >> >> > > (momentum) and looks like the right-angled triangle introduced > >> >> >> > > to us > >> >> >> > > in Pythagoras' theorem. I take Deutsch as warning us against > >> >> >> > > Bacon's > >> >> >> > > Idol of the Theatre. > > >> >> >> > > On 20 Nov, 04:56, James<[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> Whew Neil, I lack the time to grasp it well, though my > >> >> >> > >> instincts tell me > >> >> >> > >> to re-skim Pierce and modal logics to find out why it sounds so > >> >> >> > >> familiar. In my limited view S4 really bites us in the > >> >> >> > >> cognitive bias > >> >> >> > >> (meh, posterior) and Deutsche lays that out well on > >> >> >> > >> counterfactuals IMO. > >> >> >> > >> Hope I get more time soon to compare his robot with the 3,2,1 > >> >> >> > >> configuration in Trikonic > > ... > > read more » --
