Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid. Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "Mehma Sarja" <mehmasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> you failed at making any point. > > i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format: > > > > debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a > > associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a > > reason for unused installed services > > > > openbsd limitations do not apply 1:1 to other systems unless they > > happen to be openbsd. in the previous sentence, "openbsd" can be > > replaced by any word > > > OK, I got the first paragraph but not the second. Could you please > "rebrand" it so people like me can unnerstand? I just got off the boat. > To be clear, which is my thing today, here is how I read the "openbsd > limitations..." sentence: OpenBSD limitations apply only to OpenBSD. As > my 4-year old would say, "Hello..." Your last sentence is equally > baffling. I understand you may be mad at some responders, but the lack > of clarity makes us haze over your argument and take the topic off on a > tangent that you do not like. And that makes you mad, it is a Type A > thing - we understand. > > Simple, clear sentences sting the most. > > Mehma
