shoot it again son.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
> Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
> left. What next?
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net> wrote:
> > Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid.
> > Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now.
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "Mehma Sarja" <mehmasa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> you failed at making any point.
> >> > i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format:
> >> >
> >> > debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a
> >> > associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a
> >> > reason for unused installed services
> >> >
> >> > openbsd limitations do not apply 1:1 to other systems unless they
> >> > happen to be openbsd. in the previous sentence, "openbsd" can be
> >> > replaced by any word
> >> >
> >> OK, I got the first paragraph but not the second. Could you please
> >> "rebrand" it so people like me can unnerstand? I just got off the boat.
> >> To be clear, which is my thing today, here is how I read the "openbsd
> >> limitations..." sentence: OpenBSD limitations apply only to OpenBSD. As
> >> my 4-year old would say, "Hello..." Your last sentence is equally
> >> baffling. I understand you may be mad at some responders, but the lack
> >> of clarity makes us haze over your argument and take the topic off on a
> >> tangent that you do not like. And that makes you mad, it is a Type A
> >> thing - we understand.
> >>
> >> Simple, clear sentences sting the most.
> >>
> >> Mehma
