Hilarity.

ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/uk/itsolutions/developer/RSDC2007/Rational_song.mp3

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:48:24PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I have sen many attempts at UML and they all ended in tears.  Not
> surprising because UML is an academic thing that does not apply to that
> thing we call "reality".  Total waste of time.  But wait, it gets
> better!  If you want to see it fail even more spectacularly use the
> "tools" they have such as rational rose.  Hilarity ensues, I promise.
> 
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:08:47PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> > Sorry for such an out of topic thread, hear my pain:
> > 
> > I'm really sick of hearing about UML/RUP and all this boulshit about
> > software engineering in my university.
> > 
> > My feeling is that someone wrote it, never implemented it, and for
> > some stupid reason, the industry/academia bought it.
> > 
> > So as I regard the openbsd folks as highly skilled developers, I ask
> > for your opinion.
> > 
> > Is my impression completely wrong ?
> > 
> > Do any of you believe in it ?
> > 
> > Thanks.

Reply via email to