On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:48:24PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > I have sen many attempts at UML and they all ended in tears. Not > surprising because UML is an academic thing
Wasn't it a business thing from the beginning on, as you wrote in the next paragraph? > that does not apply to that > thing we call "reality". Total waste of time. But wait, it gets > better! If you want to see it fail even more spectacularly use the > "tools" they have such as rational rose. Hilarity ensues, I promise.
