The biggest downside to the Mustang 5.0 is, much like the rice rockets of today, there are only so many modifications that are available for the cars and since so many people have the cars, the damn things start to look like clones.
The early Fox chassis Mustangs were the worst for cheap interior trim - the later models used better plastic but it's still akin to driving a Tempo with balls. If gasoline weren't so expensive, I'd love to have a LX 5.0 notchback as a commuter car - nothing like instantaneous throttle oversteer to get your blood pumping in the morning. --- Patrick Austin <[email protected]> wrote: > The thing is that there are a LOT of different varieties of 5.0's > out > there. A mustang GT or convertable is a pretty heavy car, and all > the > slushbox ones are slow, but a decent 5.0l LX with even mild mods is > a very > quick car. > > However, has anyone ever been INSIDE one? They're the nastiest, > most > low-budget cars out there. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ _____________ List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
