As Stan Laurel once observed "Aren't you over bounding your steps?" 
(Linguistically speaking of course.
Paul,Evanston

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 9, 2012, at 4:54 PM, "Owen Jenkins" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are we here thinking of an on-going, pro-active, utilisation scenario in this 
> specific and totally unique exemplification?
>  
> Not, of course, that I should for one moment, in my wildest dreams, possibly 
> conceive of a continuum situation where excessive verbosity could perceivably 
>  be considered as a means of motivationalised expression. If you catch my 
> drift, in this current, interactive, recreational communication activity. Now 
> you have a whole new raft of modular expositionalist verbiage to contend with.
>  
> Unaccustomed as I am to saying as many words as possibly in an attempt to 
> obfuscate, obscure and otherwise hide the complete lack of meaning in any of 
> the foregoing drivel, I feel it behoves me to say, at this temporal juncture, 
> 'Good Night'.
>  
> O.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> To: mogtalk2
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 9:51 PM
> Subject: RE: [mogtalk2] grammar
> 
> Then in the example I highlighted, “use” would be correct I think. Often 
> “use” can be used in place of the even uglier “utilize” and “utilization”,
> TC
> David.
>  
> From: Owen Jenkins [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 09 June 2012 20:09
> To: mogtalk2
> Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] grammar
>  
> There's a subtle difference in meaning. "Usage" is about the way something is 
> used, rather than the fact of    its being used.
>  
> In English, there was, usually, a good reason for more than one word to exist 
> with generally similar meaning. There would be a nuance (English word?? 
> Another strength of English - if we have no suitable word, we'll borrow one) 
> of meaning.
>  
> Cheers,
> Owen.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> To: mogtalk2
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 6:16 PM
> Subject: [mogtalk2] grammar
>  
> Why ugly big “*usage” when “use” does just as well?
>  
> TC
> David.
>  
> View posts on The Mail Archive 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> Modify Your Subscription
> 
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5058 - Release Date: 06/09/12
> View posts on The Mail Archive 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> Modify Your Subscription      
> View posts on The Mail Archive 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> Modify Your Subscription       



-------------------------------------------
View posts on The Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
[http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/]

Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to